You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsDiscussions Parent ForumDiscussions Parent ForumMan-Hating Wome...Man-Hating Wome...Joanne Bowring - man hater - hater of her own son JoshJoanne Bowring - man hater - hater of her own son Josh
Previous Previous
Next Next
New Post
 5/22/2013 9:12 AM

What a shame I have to start to denounce women who would claim to be “good women” and women who would have claimed to be my “friend”.

However, having repeatedly appealed to these women over a 5 year period and their total refusal to stand up for truth, justice, liberty and equality before the law it means that they have to be named and shamed and denounced to get them to do what they should have done in the first place.

These women are in particular need of being denounced as man haters because they are women who claimed the benefits of “affirmative action” and “equality”. They got good paying jobs. They asked to be given an equal chance and were accorded those chances. But when asked to stand up for truth, justice, liberty and equality before the law they chose to openly and publicly support a criminal woman against a man they knew to be honest. And in most cases they knew us for a LONG time.

So I am denouncing these women because they SHOULD have publicly stood up for truth, justice, liberty, and equality before the law.

As I keep saying to people. The biggest disappointment in my life has been women. I was sold a lie by my mother when I was too young to know it was a lie and when I trusted my mother.

I tell every young man I meet. NEVER trust your mother about ANYTHING because they are LYING to you about what women are like in the VAST majority.

Now, with that as an introduction I will talk about this specific woman.

Joanne Bowring - Man hater

I believe this is her linkedin though with so little detail visible I can not be sure.

This is the facebook for her son Josh Bowring. Josh and Joshua John Nolan were in the same class so Josh Bowring is now 20. It is time for him to hear about what his mother did and make up his own mind for himself.

Joannes husband, Ian Bowring, is in the same business as me. Ian was in full agreement that his wife support a woman he knew to be a criminal and did nothing to stop his wife from doing that. I wonder how Josh Bowring will take the news that his father openly condones and supports women committing criminal acts against men. I guess Josh has to go ask his father why Ian took the position that his son should be a 4th class citizen behind women, children and STRAY DOGS.

Ians linkedin is here.

Ian and Joanne Bowring were introduced to Jennifer and I through a mutual friend, Murray Quarmby. Ian and Joanne were a great help to us as we settled into Ireland.  I really appreciated their help. Joanne in particular went out of her way to make life easier for Jennifer. I thanked Joanne many times for her efforts.

Because Ian and I were in the same business we also got along very well. Joanne and Ian became our closest friends and support in Ireland and I was very grateful for them doing that.

Joanne and Ian were frequent guests at our house and we were also frequent guests at their house. This is what friends do.

When Jennifer was committing crimes against me I first went to her father and her son. They were not able to stop her committing these crimes. So I went to her oldest friend and my oldest woman friend who is now Susan Chong. I wanted to keep the fact that Jennifer was committing crimes a private matter and did not see that it would be in anyones favour that Jennifer be found out to be a criminal past the very closest of friends who could be trusted with that information.

I thought being a criminal would reflect badly on Jennifer. I was only much later that I came to find out that being a criminal has no effect on a womans reputation, indeed, if anything the willingness to commit crimes against her husband is seen as “empowering” and “liberating” and “one in the eye for the men” as far as women are concerned. Who knew, eh?

A man who commits a crime against a woman is a “monster” but a woman who commits a crime against a man is “striking a blow against the patriarchy”.

When Susan refused to even speak with Jennifer on this topic I had to go further afield. My first woman of call was Joanne. The reader should understand that far from being critical of Joanne in going to her the very fact that I trusted her with what I thought was extremely personal and sensitive information, that Jennifer was abusing our children and committing crimes and I needed some help from a woman to stop her from doing so to ensure I did not need to resort to violence to protect my children shows enormous trust and respect in Joanne. This is exactly how I felt about her at the time.

I called Joanne and asked if she would listen to me. She said yes. I told her what the situation was. I asked her if she would please talk to Jennifer and explain to her that committing perjury in the courts and telling lies about the childrens father so as to get money was not in the best interests of the children. I also explained that Jennifer had frustrated me at every turn in trying to raise my children in the Christian faith and as a Christian woman Joanne must be concerned about the eternal souls of the children being left in the exclusive care of a woman who openly denounced Christianity and refused to raise the children according to the oath she made at their baptisms.

I put it to Joanne that the issue at hand was the eternal souls of the children and that they were being abused by a criminal woman who was selfish and greedy and in love with money and absolutely prepared to use her children as weapons to get money that she had no right to have.

Joanne took all this in and said she would seek counsel from Ian and get back to me. I thanked her for her time and appreciated her willingness to consider my request for help that was very much needed.

A few days later Joanne got back to me and said that her and Ian had decided that they felt they did not want to get in to the middle of the battle that Jennifer had started and wished to remain out of it. I thanked Joanne and Ian for their consideration of the matter. Even if the answer was no I was grateful they had seriously considered helping me. It was only then that I turned to Mouria Quinlan Pluck.

Joanne and I an were under no obligation to help me. They were good family friends. So I said to Joanne that I would appreciate it if she would please stay out of this situation because it was going to get very messy.

So imagine my surprise when I saw Joanne send a JOB REFERENCE to Jennifer describing her as honest and hard working!! Joanne Bowring knew FOR A FACT that Jennifer was committing perjury, that she was abusing her children, that she was putting their very eternal souls at risk AND that she had ready access to money from the asset of the house.

She also knew Jennifer to be an idler of the first order who would not even keep the house neat and tidy to any reasonable extent. Joanne was at our house PLENTY of times to see that Jennifer kept a poor house and refused to help me in my business. That Jennifer refused to assist me in my business was an open discussion with Ian and Joanne. It was no secret that Jennifer was an idler. She could not hide the fact that she refused to help me while I was always working so hard to support the family.

All our close friends knew Jennifer openly mocked me as to how I had to work all the time while she got to have “an extended European holiday”. She would say so to people at dinner parties and say it loudly and proudly. You could see men like Ian cringe inside when Jennifer would say such things as the men knew just how insulting Jennifer was trying to be.

Yet here was Joanne LYING to some prospective employer how Jennifer was honest and hard working. I could not take Joanne up on this email at the time as she would have told Jennifer that I was watching her email. So I had to let that sit. And I let it sit for some years before I pointed it out to Joanne and Ian in the private.

I have since asked Joanne and Ian, many times over, to now speak publicly to denounce Jennifer for her crimes and child abuse. Joanne and Ian have decided to remain silent and silence is consent. This means Joanne and Ian are consenting to, condoning and supporting the crimes Jennifer committed which are perjury, kidnapping, extortion, theft and child abuse.

It gives me no pleasure to have to denounce people like this. However Joanne and Ian have a son, Josh. He is the same age as Joshua John Nolan and they were even in the same class at school. Joanne and Ian are sending a strong signal to their son and all lads of the generation of Josh and Joshua that as the older generation they consider the young lads 4th class citizens behind women, children and STRAY DOGS.

In my opinion this is a terrible message to send to young men. It will make them resentful, bitter and violent. The message to young men from people like Ian and Joanne, who are in the vast majority by the way, is that no matter how good the young man is, if he works for the next 20-30 years to provide for his family his children and his house and everything he laboured for can be taken from him and THE OLDER GENERATIONS SUPPORT THIS 4th CLASS CITIZENRY IDEA OF YOUNG MEN.

Now. Many of the older generation like Joanne and Ian will try and tell lies about men like me and try and slander us and make out that we did something “wrong” or somehow “deserved” to be criminally abused. That is the usual tack taken. Assault and slander the victim some more to try and convince the young men BY LYING that it will not happen to them. The problem that Joanne and Ian specifically have is that Josh Bowring knows Joshua John Nolan very well and knows full well that I was a great father and great husband who was highly praised by his wife in letters like this.

So Joanne and Ian can not sell Josh Bowring on the idea that I “deserved” to have my children kidnapped and my house stolen. So it is really up to Josh Bowring to ask his parents why they consented to my criminal victimisation and why they consented to Joshua John Nolan having his father removed from his life against his fathers will.

It is up to Josh Bowring to ask his parents what they might do in HIS case. Would they take the same approach as MY FATHER by betraying his own son so as to remain in good with an evil criminal woman to be able to get to see their grand children. Because just like Darragh Quinlan Pluck Josh Bowring faces the prospect that he has seen his parents openly support a criminal woman abuse a good father and husband and he can have no expectation that his parents would stand by him based merely on truth and justice should he be in that same position himself in 20 years time.

And it is up to Josh Bowring to ask himself the question whether he is willing to go into a marriage when everyone around him is saying “that could never happen to you” when he has seen his friend, Joshua John Nolan, and his friends father, put exactly through that wringer and his own parents not say a word about the crimes Joshua suffered or his father suffered.

Josh Bowring is well advised to keep in mind that in the church it is all sweetness and “until death to us part” but in the divorce courts it is hatred and greed and vindictiveness and lies no matter WHAT he does over the next 10, 20, 30 years. And Josh Bowring is well advised to remember that when a woman does commit crimes against a man his own mother will not only stay silent on this issue, she will LIE on behalf of the woman to the womans advantage.

This is a very bad message for a mother to send to her son because it breaks the credibility of the mother in the sons eyes. If Joanne Bowring looks Josh Bowring in the eye and says “if a woman ever did this to you I would stand by you” Josh Bowring should have the following conversation: 

“The issue is not whether you stand up for me as an individual, the issue is that you did not stand up for truth and justice as a principle. The principle is that good people stand up for truth and justice ALL the time, not when it suites them.

You failed Peter Nolan when he asked you for your help. You were in the morally right position and you had nothing at risk if you helped him. But you did not stand up for truth and justice when it did not suit you.

What if I have children and my wife promises you that she will let you see your grand children if you go along with her, but if you support me she will never let you see your grand children? That is a common case now. You will have a lot to lose if you support me. Access to your grand children. You showed me that you do not stand up for truth and justice as a principle. That when it is not convenient for you that you will turn a blind eye to a woman committing crimes. Yet you stand here any try and tell me you WILL stand up for truth and justice even if the price is you never see your grand children again? And you expect me to believe that?

Why would you EVER not stand up for truth and justice? Why would you allow your credibility to be able to be rightly questioned? Even by your own son? It is not Peter Nolan you did not stand up for. It is all the men who have been criminally victimised by women in divorce. And I might be one of them one day. Who will stand up for me? Look around. NONE of your peers, people around 50, stand up for men who are victims of crimes in divorce. NONE OF THEM! Not their mothers, not their fathers.

Do you honestly think that lads like me have not seen lads like Joshua John Nolan lose their fathers because of the actions of criminal women and did not notice? Do you think we did not notice that the peers of the Peter Nolans of the world, you, let them be criminally victimised? Do you think we will believe that your generation would not allow the same to happen to us? Do you think we will EVER TRUST YOU AGAIN? Do you imagine we will trust the women who are our peers who also saw this and said nothing?

By failing Peter Nolan, and all the OTHER MEN you have known were being criminally victmised by women in the divorce courts you have sent ALL us young men a very loud and clear message. We ARE 4th class citizens as Peter has pointed out and you AGREE with that position. And any argument you present to the contrary lacks evidence because Peter Nolans book “The Truth Be Told” presents the PROOF in spades as to how men are treated in divorce today.

If you ever want to earn the my trust again? You are going to have to deal with your silence on this matter and all the OTHER divorces you know about.

And lastly? Look at Peters evidence the members of the parliament are criminals. They have sold my future down the toilet and claim I have a large “debt” to pay via taxes from my labour. I didn’t create that debt. You did. Your generation did. Your generation is the one who knew your politicians were criminals. And when Peter Nolan asked YOUR GENERATION for help to put these politicians on trial to secure MY FUTURE AND MY RIGHTS YOUR GENERATION HATED ON HIM AND PERSECUTED HIM SOME MORE…making it more difficult for him to secure MY FUTURE AND MY RIGHTS! What do you have to say about that?!”

Yep. If I was Josh Bowring I would be having that conversation with his parents. If I were Josh Bowring I would be passing this link around to ALL my twenty something male friends and saying “you lads might want to ask your parents these questions. It is YOUR PARENTS GENERATION that has sold your future down the toilet. You might want to ask them why they did that. YOUR PARENTS know the politicians, lawyers and police are criminals. You might want to ask them why they have not supporter Peter Nolan and his colleagues re-introduce the rule of law for YOUR PROTECTION.”

As I said. It gives me no pleasure to make this post. But when people sin, when people fail, they have to be presented with their sin, their failure, and rebuked if they do not correct it. If they do not correct it subsequent to a private rebuke then a public rebuke is in order. If people do not like public rebukes? Then they are best to remedy their sins and their failures in the private when offered the opportunity. Since I have been at this five and a half years? No one can make the claim that I have not given all parties plenty of time to remedy their sins and failures in the private.

By the way? Joanne and Ian are hardly alone. There is no man or woman in Ireland who is 50+ years of age who does not know women commit crimes in the family courts and who does not know the politicians are a bunch of criminals. To attempt to deny this would be a joke.

Virtually NONE of them will actually do anything about it. This has destroyed what could have been a rosy future for many hundreds of thousands of young Irish men. Those men have every right to know who betrayed them and who refused to secure their future and their rights when those men were too young to do so for themselves.

Those men are well advised to inform themselves and their peers that the women of their age know all about what happens in the family law courts too and the women of their own age are hoping to take advantage of the family law courts themselves on day. The young men should have no illusions that the women of their own age are betraying them in their silence.

Joanne and Ian also have a daughter. And it is very likely none of the young men who meet her will ever trust her because those young men will find out that her mother openly supported a criminal women victimise a man in divorce. The young men will, very likely correctly, assume that since Joanne supported a woman her own age criminally victimise a man in divorce that she will,  just like Irene Toal and Bill Toal, support her OWN DAUGHTER criminally victimise a man.

Once broken? Trust and credibility never goes back just the way it was. The old saying of a cracked mirror is correct. No matter how much you mend the cracked mirror? You will always be able to see the crack.  And this is what Joanne and Ian did when they failed to stand up for truth and justice no matter WHO was the perpetrator and who was the victim. They cracked the mirror of credibility they have. As have so many of their peers.

This is one reason why I refused to tolerate any crimes against me. I will NEVER fail to stand up for truth and justice so as to retain my own personal integrity and credibility. I would never compromise these things as to do so would make me a lesser man and I would know it.

Now. It is up to Joanne and Ian to decide what they will do with this public rebuke and call to stand up for truth and justice REGARDELSS of who the perpetrator of a crime is and who the victim of a crime is. I am sure Josh Bowring and their daughter will watch their response to this public rebuke. After all, the futures of Josh and the daughter are yet to be written. The daughter is not yet 18 and so I have done her the courtesy of not naming her.

@Josh? You are well advised to read this book. You are a fourth class citizen in your own land behind women, children and STRAY DOGS. If men like me are not successful at re-introducing the rule of law in to Ireland? You are going to live in abject slavery and tyranny before too long…if you are not killed in the transition.

And what have your mother and father done to secure your future these last 5 years as you government has introduced the soft police state that now exists? And what have they done to resist the harsh police state that is planned? Anything? Nothing?

It was for lads just like you and so many others on your facebook that I have worked so hard to re-introduce the rule of law into Ireland….and not even your own mother or father could care about securing your future by helping me. How about that?

Previous Previous
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsDiscussions Parent ForumDiscussions Parent ForumMan-Hating Wome...Man-Hating Wome...Joanne Bowring - man hater - hater of her own son JoshJoanne Bowring - man hater - hater of her own son Josh