You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Welcome to the Crimes Against Fathers Forums

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneric Parent ForumGeneric Parent ForumEmail Conversat...Email Conversat...Liar and hypocrite Loud Mouthed Lyn BennettsLiar and hypocrite Loud Mouthed Lyn Bennetts
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 10/2/2011 8:40 PM
 
 Modified By host  on 1/14/2012 7:37:28 AM
The original email storm caused by Lyn Bennetts is here.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

And this is a recent email to my mailing list copying loud mouthed lyn bennetts. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com] 
Sent: 02 October 2011 09:37
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Cc: 'Lyn Bennetts'
Subject: FW: Take Action NOW, stop paying Rates and Unite with us


Gentlemen,
Just in case you want to see how BAD OUR WOMEN ARE and how much THEY HATE MEN now?
 
I offer you “freedom fighter” Loud Mouthed Lyn Bennetts as the Prototypical example of ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH AUSTRALIAN WOMAN and why I DESPISE their LIES AND HYPOCRISY so much. 
 
I came across Lyn Bennetts a while ago. The email trail is below.
 
http://www.peternolan.com/Forums/tabid/420/forumid/57/threadid/549/scope/posts/Default.aspx 
 
Lyn Bennetts claims to be a “freedom fighter” and “fighting against the guvment”. 
 
Well? Who for?
 
WOMEN ONLY. THAT IS WHO FOR.
 
Why? Because if the criminal happens to be a WOMAN who is USING THE SAME CRIMINAL GUVMENT TO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST A MAN THAT IS PERFECTLY OK WITH LYN BENNETTS.
 
Just like it is PERFECTLY OK with Chris Fields.
 
I have been waiting NINE MONTHS for Chris Fields to answer the question.
 
“What is your position on women who have claimed equality being treated as equal before the law?”
 
Chris Fields has FAILED to answer this simple question in NINE MONTHS. Those of you who know him might ask why it is that a Christian minister FAILS such a simple test.
 
Gentlemen,
It’s simple. Lying and hypocritical women like LOUD MOUTHED LYN BENNETTS will tell you how GOOD they are…until it is time to sit on a jury and hold a criminal woman accountable for her crimes on an “equal before the law” basis. When you ask LOUD MOUTHED LYN BENNETTS THAT QUESTION? YOU WILL GET HATRED BACK.
 
Just like I did.
 
I am not willing to support ANY activity that will assist women until WOMEN SUPPORT THE CONCEPT THAT WOMEN WHO HAVE CLAIMED EQUALITY ARE TO BE TREATED AS EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW AND WOMEN ARE WILLING TO PUT WOMEN ON TRIAL.
 
I am exposing the hypocrisy of our women. And they HATE that I am doing that.
 
Best Regards 
 
Peter 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lyn Bennetts 
To: Lyn Bennetts 
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 10:35 PM
Subject: Take Action NOW, stop paying Rates and Unite with us
 
The following is for educational purposes and not intended to be specific legal advice or an exhaustive summary.
If you require legal advice you should consult an experienced solicitor in the relevant area of law.
 
 
 
 
ARE YOU A RATE PAYER?
If yes, then you need to read this!
Date: 1st of October 2011
 
Ok People, it's time to take United action,
Council’s are unlawful and proof is provided below!
 
Read this below, it is brilliantly set out and easy to understand and I would like to congratulate A F Parker for taking the time to put it all together, I believe that it is that well researched that it is worthy of the backing of The People of 
The Commonwealth of Australia.
 
However, in order to achieve this; it is a matter for The People to take into their own hands, we need to take action, we need to do it as a united group and we need to do it NOW! The council is the governments’ weakest link and they are operating unlawfully and illegally against us and our Commonwealth Constitution.
 
The People simply need to stop paying rates until this matter is heard in the High Court of Australia and before a jury of our peers, the court costs are to be paid for by the Australian Commonwealth Government Tax Payers Taxes!
This issue is being brought against Council's Australia Wide on behalf of The People of The Commonwealth of Australia and as such The People's Taxes are to be used to represent its People.
 
Until we can get this matter into a high court there will be no status quo set as no one has taken the council to court on this matter and in such a massive way before and until this is dealt with by the courts then council's will continue to believe they have a right to charge us Rates which is actually a (TAX) on our land until it is heard in a High Court of Australia. 
 
As I have said in very similar words as below and in recent emails 
 
•         Rates are an illegal TAX 
 
•         Rates are a TAX because Rates do not contain a Goods & Services Tax (G.S.T) and this is because they cannot charge us a tax a tax. 
 
•         Due to the fact that no goods or services are provided by the council for that tax/rates charge; then council cannot charge you simply because your property has improved in value.
 
•         Plus the fact that this tax/rates charge is purely charged based on council's own property evaluation of YOUR property shows continued bias in this matter, you will note that when the property value dropped since the stock market crash, the rates have never gone down; they only every go up and also, please
 
•         Bear in mind that Council's cannot charge you for anything that they do not provide you with a service for!
 
We must UNITE on one issue all at one time so let's start with the Rates and bombard the courts with support for The People who are facing court on such matters. 
 
This is how you can help:
 
Copy this off and hand out to people,
 
Paste it on Facebook,
 
Email it on so everyone learns about this rort that council’s are subjecting us to and
Make a personal commitment to attend the court cases as a show of support for those who are actually being taken to court on this matter, plus the more you learn about this topic; the more you can teach others.
 
To write an email of support does make the person standing up for our rights feel better, however, by turning up to their court case with (The People) all saying the same thing, this is something that the courts cannot ignore; it's called (People Power) and it is (The Will of The People)!
 
To start it off, firstly send this entire email to everyone on your contacts list to inform them of what we are doing, then change A F Parkers name to your name and then print or copy off the letter below and send a hard copy via registered post to every council member that you have in your shire, also forward it registered post to your local and federal members. This way they will be inundated with actual letters that they have to sign for and actually open, can you imagine the impact this will have around this country.
 
I am sick of fiddling around with this and I know that the Australian people want action, so let's feed it to the buggers and refuse to pay our rates; I mean tax, until it is either abolished or upheld in a High Court of Australia.
 
There are already dozen’s of Australian Freedom Fighters who do not pay rates/taxes, their matter will eventually be heard in the High Court of Australia, will you consider joining this United movement to stop council’s from operating illegally and unlawfully? We need your commitment to help protect and retain The People of Australia’s Rights that are contained in The Commonwealth Constitution of Australian.
 
Together We Will Make a Difference!
 
Kind regards
 
Lyn Bennetts
Mobile 0410226667
Freedom Fighters of Australia
 
 
 
55 Dixon Street
Coolangatta QLD 4225                                                                                                  20 December 2004
 
P C Achterstraat
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
Box 40442
Sydney 2001
 
Dear Commissioner 
 
RE: Register for Land Tax 2005.                                                                                                  Client ID: 2020074
 
The High Court of Australia ruled that “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX” and because of this the ‘State Excise on Fuel, Tobacco & Alcohol’ was removed.
 
It can be clearly seen that the authors of the Constitution were not allowing for any Parliament other than the Federal Parliament to impose a tax. Therefore, the only land rates/tax that can be imposed within Australia is one imposed by the Federal Parliament through the Commissioner for Taxation. 
 
Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.
 
Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that the power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament. 
 
Since the parliament of New South Wales has no powers under the Australian Constitution to impose taxes, which has been, determined where The High Court of Australia ruled, “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX” and therefore, “Land Tax” is unlawful.  The state government will have to lodge an appeal to the High Court of Australia to overturn the previous decision before they can legally impose such tax upon the people or have the federal Government hold a referendum to alter the constitution.
 
Section 109 of the Australian Constitution states:
“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”
 
Because the Parliament of New South Wales is subject to the Commonwealth Parliament and also subject to the Commonwealth Constitution, the states cannot lawfully impose a ‘Land Tax’, ‘only the Commonwealth Government holds such taxation authority’.
 
Until the State of NSW can provide a legal authority either from the High Court of Australia; or from the Federal Government giving authority to raise taxes, to comply with your intentions would be in breach of the law itself, that you are bound to uphold. When you present such legal authority we will certainly provide the information you request.
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
A F PARKER
 
 
 
 
COUNCILS ILLEGAL UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
 
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE ILLEGAL UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION DETERMINED BY TWO REFERENDUMS
 18 May 1974 & 3 September 1988
 
The Australian Electoral Commission on their CD “Australian Referendums 1906—1999” have advised the following points:-
 
1. “Under the Australian Commonwealth Constitution any powers not delegated to the Commonwealth are the prerogative of the States UNLESS THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY DENIED.” 
 
2. The Referendum on 18th of May 1974 
Q4. Local Government Bodies – The fourth proposal sought to amend section 51
of the Constitution to give the Federal Government power to give financial
assistance to lend and borrow money for any local government body.
 
3. The people voted NO. 
 
4. Q4. The referendum was NOT carried. 
                One State recorded a YES vote (NSW), however; nationally only 46.85% of electors voted YES.
 
TODAY WE HAVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT DIRECTLY IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
 
5. The Referendum on 3rd of September 1988 
                Q3: Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988.  
                Q3. To alter the Constitution to recognise local government
                                
6. The people voted NO. 
 
7. Q3. The referendum was NOT carried. 
                No States recorded a YES vote. However; nationally only 33.62% of electors voted YES.
 
8. The legislative proposal was, "119A. - Each State shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in 
accordance with the laws of the State and empowered to administer, and to make bylaws, for their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the State." 
 
9. Unlike a plebiscite, a referendum is binding on the government. 
 
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RECOGNITION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS IN DIRECT CONTRAVENTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
 
The Commonwealth Government is funding Local Governments directly contrary to the Constitution.
 
All local government has been constitutionally illegal since 3-9-88 when there was a referendum to incorporate local Government into the Australian Constitution. 
 
This means that all local government authorities now operate without a lawful head of power. The legal bind is that states cannot retain legislation that condones any form of local government.
 
Thus all levels of government are operating illegally ignoring the instructions of the people.  If the government will not obey the Constitutional Will of The People and thus democratic law, why should the people obey parliamentary law?  The precedence has been set.
 
FURTHERMORE Local Government Rates are deemed a tax thus no GST is applicable.
 
Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that the power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.  No states have authority under the constitution to impose a tax. Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that “The power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.”  Thus Local Government Rates being a tax are unlawful and in breach of the constitution.
 
 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT RECOGNISED WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION AND WAS REJECTED
AT REFERENDUM OF THE AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE IN SEPTEMBER 1988 THEREFORE LOCAL COUNCIL HAS NO LAWFUL BASE
 
 Thus Councils Should Be Dismissed And Local Government Department Administrators Appointed Permanently.
 
1.       In no section within the Australian Constitution is there provision for the Federal or State Parliament to establish a third level of government without the permission of the people via a Federal Referendum.
 
2.       The High Court of Australia ruled that “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX”, and because of this the ‘State Excise on Fuel, Tobacco & Alcohol’ was removed.
 
3.       It can be clearly seen that the authors of the Constitution were not allowing for any Parliament other than the Federal Parliament to impose a tax. Therefore, the only land rates tax that can be imposed within Australia is one imposed by the Federal Parliament through the Commissioner for Taxation. 
 
4.       Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.
 
5.       Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that the power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament. 
 
6.       The Courts of Australia have long held that council rates are a tax. Yet, under the Australian Constitution, the Parliaments of the States do not have the power of taxation.
 
7.       “John Winston Howard, Peter Howard Costello & ’Commissioner for Taxation’ Michael Joseph Carmody all stated before the introduction of the infamous “Goods and Services Tax”,
        Quote:  “Local government Council Rates will attract no GST because Council Rates are a tax and we can’t tax a tax”.
 
8.       The organizations known as ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of the federation of the states into a commonwealth.
 
9.       A ‘rateable person within the meaning of the local government act 1993’ did not exist at the time of the federation of the states into a commonwealth. It can be seen then, that since ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of Federation, then there can be no continuance of local government law.
 
10.   Since ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of Federation, then there can be no continuance of ‘local government’ law. Similarly, as ‘local government land rates tax’ did not exist at the time of Federation there can be no continuance of ‘local government land rates tax’ from that time to now.  
 
11.   Following a recommendation of the Constitutional Commission of Inquiry (1985 – 1988) a Referendum was held in September 1988. (“The Constitutional Commission found that there was no basis in law, contained within the Constitution for the provision of ‘Local Government”). They found that barely 50% of the population even knew of the existence of the Constitution, let alone its contents, and that only a few percent of those under 25 years of age knew of its existence at all.)
 
12.   Question 3 from the referendum was:  A Proposed Law; ‘To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.’  Do you approve of this alteration? 
 
13.   The specific (federal Referendum) proposal was:-
        (3) Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988…. 119A, “Each state shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in accordance with the laws of the state, and empowered to administer, and make by-laws for, their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the state”.
 
14.   It was recognized that the Parliaments of the States did not have the power to establish a third tier of government via ‘local government’ and an amendment to the Constitution was necessary for them to obtain these powers.
 
15.   If the Constitution had to be altered to allow for the establishment of ‘local government’, before there could be a continuance of ‘local government from the time of federation, then it is clear that these powers did not exist at the time of the Federation of the States into a Commonwealth.
 
16.   Therefore, if the Constitution had to be altered to allow for the “establishment and continuance” of ‘local government’ these powers did not exist at the time of Federation or sections 106 to 108 of the constitution would have applied and the constitution would not have had to be altered.
 
17.   For the Constitution to be able to be changed, there must be a majority, (either for or against), in each state and a favourable majority must be returned in a majority of States.
 
      The Australian Electoral Commission advise:-
        “Referendum results – 3 September 1988”
        “(41) Local Government”, being totally reject by 3 084 678 votes of the Australian people. 
        “Question 3”. 
        “A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.”
 
        “Do you approve this proposed alteration?”
 
        “The Constitution recognises government at the Commonwealth and State levels but makes no mention of local government. Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988 sought to give such constitutional recognition to local government.”
 
18.   “Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 3 084 678 votes.” 
 
19.   Therefore the continuance of Local Government in defiance of the referendum vote of the people is unlawful?  Thus the Minister would be acting in accordance with the Australian people’s referendum results if he dismissed the Tweed Shire Council.  In fact it is encumbered upon him explicitly follow the instruction of people’s referendum and dismiss all councils.
 
20.   No other conclusion can be derived from this result other than that Local government was not legally recognized by the people of Australia, who are the Government of Australia through their agents the Parliaments.
 
21.   The Parliament of the State did not have these powers before the Referendum, and they were most certainly prohibited from having them after the Referendum.
 
22.   This was confirmed by the Parliament of NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee (No 5), Report 19, Local Government Amalgamations, December 2003 which states on page 51, at 4.78: “Local Government is not recognized in the Australian Constitution. In 1974 and 1988 constitutional recognition of local government was considered in referenda to change the constitution but neither referendum was successful.”
 
23.   The members of the various Parliaments of the States and the Commonwealth are the elected representatives of the people of Australia. They are not there as representatives of the Parliaments, but as elected servants of the people. Twice, in 1974 and in 1988 the people of Australia (the Government) told their elected representatives that they did not wish to constitutionally recognize local government.
 
24.   Since the people do not wish to recognize ‘local government’, and since the Constitution does not recognize or grant the power to establish a third level of government, then under Section 109 of the Constitution it was illegal for the Parliament of New South Wales to enact the Local Government Act of 1993.
 
25.   The 1988 Referendum was a public act under the Federal Constitution. Sections 106 and 108 subject the Constitutions of the States to the over-riding authority of the Federal Constitution and Section 118 requires that full faith and credit be given throughout the Commonwealth of Australia to the laws and public acts and records of every State. If full faith and credit is given, there appears to be NO LEGAL WAY any States can overturn the specific outcome of a Federal Referendum
 
26.   The Referendum (Constitution Alteration) Act of 1906-1973 is a Commonwealth of Australia Act. The Schedule of the Referendum Act provides the wording of the “Writ for Referendum” and includes the words:
 
27.   “We (the Electorate) command that you (the parliament) cause a proposed law entitled… ……… to be submitted, according to law, in each State to the electors qualified to vote for the election of Members of the House of Representatives” (for each of the six states). It is clear that a “Writ” directs that a Federal Referendum must be by way of a vote state by state. This has the same effect as a state referendum, but under the Federal Act, by doing so invokes Section 109 of the Australian Constitution as an authority that over-rides any inconsistency in the legislation of the States. 
 
28.   Since the parliament of New South Wales has no powers under the Australian Constitution to create a Third Tier of Government, and since they were twice told by the people they serve that the people did not wish to recognize Local Government, then the enactment of the Local Government Act of 1993 was illegal.
 
29.   THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT OF 1993 HAS NO BASIS EITHER CONSTITUTIONALLY OR LEGALLY.
 
30.   The Constitution was formatted to protect the Australian people from a number of things, and also to give the people of Australia the ability of Self Determination of Government. 
      NOWHERE DOES IT PERMIT THE PARLIAMENTS, OR THE JUDICIARY, TO OPERATE OUTSIDE THESE GUIDELINES.
 
Referendum results
3 September 1988
(39) Parliamentary Terms; (40) Fair Elections; (41) Local Government; (42) Rights and Freedoms
Question 1
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to provide for 4 year maximum terms for members of both Houses of the Commonwealth Parliament.
Do you approve this proposed alteration?
Constitution Alteration (Parliamentary Terms) 1988 sought to increase House of Representatives terms from a maximum of three years to a maximum of four years, and to reduce Senate terms from a six-year fixed term to a four-year fixed term. It also sought to introduce simultaneous elections for the Houses.
Result
State Number on rolls Ballot papers issued For Against Informal
% %
New South Wales 3 564 856 3 297 246 1 032 621 31.66 2 228 503 68.34 36 122
Victoria 2 697 096 2 491 183 886 128 36.20 1 561 759 63.80 43 296
Queensland 1 693 247 1 542 293 538 779 35.15 993 822 64.85 9 692
South Australia 937 974 873 511 229 938 26.76 629 454 73.24 14 119
Western Australia 926 636 845 209 255 556 30.67 577 555 69.33 12 098
Tasmania 302 324 282 785 70 698 25.34 208 297 74.66 3 790
Australian Capital Territory 166 131 149 128 64 458 43.62 83 328 56.38 1 342
Northern Territory 74 695 56 370 21 092 38.13 34 222 61.87 1 056
Total for Commonwealth 10 362 959 9 537 725 3 099 270 32.91 6 316 940 67.09 121 515
Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 3 217 670 votes.
Not carried
Question 2
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to provide for fair and democratic parliamentary elections throughout Australia.
Do you approve this proposed alteration?
Constitution Alteration (Fair Elections) 1988 sought to ensure that democratic electoral arrangements would be guaranteed for Commonwealth, State and Territory elections.
Result
State Number on rolls Ballot papers issued For Against Informal
% %
New South Wales 3 564 856 3 297 246 1 159 713 35.57 2 100 604 64.43 36 929
Victoria 2 697 096 2 491 183 981 508 40.12 1 465 119 59.88 44 556
Queensland 1 693 247 1 542 293 686 765 44.81 845 767 55.19 9 761
South Australia 937 974 873 511 263 006 30.61 596 102 69.39 14 403
Western Australia 926 636 845 209 266 639 32.02 566 145 67.98 12 425
Tasmania 302 324 282 785 80 608 28.89 198 372 71.11 3 805
Australian Capital Territory 166 131 149 128 76 815 51.99 70 937 48.01 1 376
Northern Territory 74 695 56 370 23 763 42.99 31 512 57.01 1 095
Total for Commonwealth 10 362 959 9 537 725 3 538 817 37.59 5 874 558 62.41 124 350
Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 2 335 741 votes.
Not carried
Question 3
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.
Do you approve this proposed alteration?
The Constitution recognises government at the Commonwealth and State levels but makes no mention of local government. Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988 sought to give such constitutional recognition to local government.
Result
State Number on rolls Ballot papers issued For Against Informal
% %
New South Wales 3 564 856 3 297 246 1 033 364 31.70 2 226 529 68.30 37 353
Victoria 2 697 096 2 491 183 882 020 36.06 1 563 957 63.94 45 206
Queensland 1 693 247 1 542 293 586 942 38.31 945 333 61.69 10 018
South Australia 937 974 873 511 256 421 29.85 602 499 70.15 14 591
Western Australia 926 636 845 209 247 830 29.76 584 863 70.24 12 516
Tasmania 302 324 282 785 76 707 27.50 202 214 72.50 3 864
Australian Capital Territory 166 131 149 128 58 755 39.78 88 945 60.22 1 428
Northern Territory 74 695 56 370 21 449 38.80 33 826 61.20 1 095
Total for Commonwealth 10 362 959 9 537 725 3 163 488 33.61 6 248 166 66.39 126 071
Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 3 084 678 votes.
Not carried
Question 4
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to extend the right to trial by jury, to extend freedom of religion, and to ensure fair terms for persons whose property is acquired by any government.
Do you approve this proposed alteration?
Constitution Alteration (Rights and Freedoms) 1988 sought to guarantee various civil rights in relation to trials, freedom of religion and compulsory acquisition of property.
Result
State Number on rolls Ballot papers issued For Against Informal
% %
New South Wales 3 564 856 3 297 246 965 045 29.65 2 289 645 70.35 42 556
Victoria 2 697 096 2 491 183 816 057 33.42 1 625 484 66.58 49 642
Queensland 1 693 247 1 542 293 503 217 32.88 1 027 218 67.12 11 858
South Australia 937 974 873 511 223 038 26.01 634 438 73.99 16 035
Western Australia 926 636 845 209 233 917 28.14 597 322 71.86 13 970
Tasmania 302 324 282 785 70 987 25.49 207 486 74.51 4 312
Australian Capital Territory 166 131 149 128 60 064 40.71 87 460 59.29 1 604
Northern Territory 74 695 56 370 20 503 37.14 34 699 62.86 1 168
Total for Commonwealth 10 362 959 9 537 725 2 892 828 30.79 6 503 752 69.21 141 145
Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 3 610 924 votes.
Not carried
 
Referendum results
1906 | 1910 | 1911 | 1913 | 1919 | 1926 | 1928 | 1937 | 1944 | 1946 | 1948 | 1951 | 1967 | 1973 | 1974 | 1977 | 1984 | 1988 | 1999
 
 
Parliamentary Library | Parliamentary Handbook home
 
Comments to: web.library@aph.gov.au
Last reviewed 10 January 2003 by the Parliamentary Library Web Manager
© Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament of Australia Web Site Privacy Statement
Images courtesy of AUSPIC
 
------
 
 

New Post
 10/2/2011 10:51 PM
 



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 02 October 2011 11:49
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Cc: 'Lyn Bennetts'; 'dorraj robertson'; Bill Toal (bill_toal@hotmail.com); 'mick@micktoalbureau.com'; 'dublinnolans@gmail.com'; 'yotch-master@hotmail.com'; 'chris merrett'
Subject: Loud Mouth Lyn Bennetts caught spreading KNOWN LIES....well done.


And Gentlemen,

 

I picked this up from an email from Gerrit. Lyn Bennetts seems to like repeating lies from the mentally unstable brother of a CRIMINAL WOMAN based on NO EVIDENCE AT ALL.

 

That would be the mentally unstable MICHAEL TOAL.

 

Here is some more lies and hypocrisy that loud mouth lyn bennetts has been want to throw around. I remind you that here is the email correspondence that is allegedly “threatening” and “aboosive”.

 

It is a little thing called EVIDENCE that loud mouthed Lyn Bennetts does not want you to see.

 

http://www.peternolan.com/Forums/tabi...

 

So let’s take the lies apart one by one.

 

“I have been continually threatened and harrassed by Peter Nolan” Nope. I have pointed out that she is NOT willing to extend the protection of the law to men by sitting on a jury to fairly and justly try women who are properly accused of crimes against fathers.

 

“Peter Nolan contacted me via an abusive and threatening email about 12 months ago and as I do; I told him where to get off ”

 

LOL!! Talk about delusional. The email trail is above. Lyn represented herself as wishing justice and right in Australia. She failed the test as to whether that justice and right applied to men. Far from telling me “where to get off” she IMMEDIATELY CAPITULATED because I was telling the TRUTH and went, instead, for the “please will some manginas help me”!! LOL!!! She is a fail at arguing and she is a fail at lying.

 

“Even though I explained my own personal situation to Peter; he became enraged and started acusing me of being a man hater? ”

 

Enraged! LOL!! In emails? I can’t make this shit up. And YES. Refusing to extend the protection of the law to MEN merely BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN and PROMOTING AND SUPPORTING WOMEN WHO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST MEN qualifies as “man-hatred” for me. And Lyn most certainly is one of those man-haters who takes the position men are not to be afforded the protection of the law by the trial by jury EVEN THOUGH SHE PRESENTS HERSELF AS A FREEOM FIGHTER!! LOL!!!

 

“Peter Nolan's ex brother in law Mick Toal (a reporter and long term collegue of mine); contacted me around the same time  and told me to be very careful of this man; his sister who was married to Peter Nolan and who had a couple of children to him; had to get  an AVO against Peter because she was worried for the safety of their children and her own life due to Peter's rage. “

 

And now I see the connection. Michael Toal is a mentally unstable man as a result of his time spent in Somalia during the civil war. Interestingly Jennifer AT NO TIME EVER ASKED FOR AN AVO so this is merely a lie propagated by THE CRIMINAL WOMANS MENTALLY UNSTABLE BROTHER, which, of course, loud mouthed Lyn Bennetts propagates as TRUE! LOL!!

 

Here is the email of my former eldest son. (jarrodsrobinson@gmail.com)   Ask HIM if Jennifer ever asked for an AVO. Indeed. Jennifer made the FALSE claim in 1997 that she was fearful of me to the police and I was severely injured in the ensuing arrest. He was witness to the incident where Jennifer LIED and had me arrested on the BASIS OF A LIE. He can testify that AS I WAS BEING CRIMINALLY ABUSED BY THE POLICE JENNIFER WAS BEGGING THEM TO STOP REALISING WHAT TROUBLE SHE WAS IN.

 

And as I point out. JARROD WAS A WITNESS. He stood RIGHT THERE AS HIS MOTHER LIED AND AS SHE BEGGED THE POLICE NOT TO INJURE ME.

 

The next day when I came home I WAS FURIOUS at the injuries I had sustained as a result of the LIES my wife told and JARROD was VERY concerned I might just hit his mother because of her TERRIBLE TREATMENT OF ME so he asked to stay in the room while Jennifer and I discussed HER LIES AND HER CRIMINAL ABUSE OF ME VIA THE COPS.

 

And to quote Jarrod “I will never get married. I have seen how my mother treated you and my father. I might get a wife like my mother.”

 

The stupid and gullible LOUD MOUTHED LYN BENNETS likes to spread LIES and SLANDER in an effort to cover up her MAN/HATRED where she takes the position that men are not entitled to the protection of the law.

 

As I said.

 

LOUD MOUTHED LYN BENNETTS IS AN EXAMPLE OF ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH AUSTRALIAN WOMEN.

 

I am quite prepared to use her as an example of such.

 

Have a nice day.

 

Peter

 

 

 

 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Lyn Bennetts <lyn_bennetts7@bigpond.com>
To: Lyn Bennetts <lyn_bennetts7@bigpond.com>
Sent: Monday, 26 September 2011 12:32 AM
Subject: FW: Jack Frost - Re Warrant - Tenix Solutions - etc

 

Warning about this person; he may be one of your contacts:

Dear fellow freedom fighters,

It has been some time now that I have been continually threatened and harrassed by Peter Nolan (see his comments below)

I am asking you all not to forward my emails on to this person.

Peter Nolan contacted me via an abusive and threatening email about 12 months ago and as I do; I told him where to get off

because if he wants my help; then ask for it; don't write me an email abusing me and then demand my help.

During these emails back and forth I also explained that I have 3 brothers who have been through the very unfair divorce court

system and I helped my brothers to win equal time with their children and to pay less than the majority of men have to pay their

X- wives in a divorce settlement.

Even though I explained my own personal situation to Peter; he became enraged and started acusing me of being a man hater?

Peter is a member of some women's hate group? their name is below; although I don't know how much of this hatred comes from them,

it is possibly more so from Peters own point of view?? However, at the time I contacted them and asked them to help Peter as I thought he

was in need of some councelling, I also asked them to stop him from emailing me; which I had also asked him to do over and over again.

Peter Nolan's ex brother in law Mick Toal (a reporter and long term collegue of mine); contacted me around the same time

and told me to be very careful of this man; his sister who was married to Peter Nolan and who had a couple of children to him; had to get

an AVO against Peter because she was worried for the safety of their children and her own life due to Peter's rage.

Peter Nolan has gone to lengths of starting up a web page containing the emails I sent him and he often refers people to that website with some hate

enraged gestures against me; for what reason I do not know, but I do not trust this man and I believe he could be very dangerous.

I do not know Peter Nolan personally and I had; had no contact with this man until he contacted me by email, these emails I have attached below

for anyone wanting more information, however, you will need to read it from the bottom up.

I just ask that anyone who has Peter Nolan as a contact to please not send on my emails to him and visa versa, I don't see the point in feeding

a fire that can't be put out.

Thank you for your assistance

Kind regards

Lyn Bennetts

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Brain and Gaz,

I have been receiving some very disturbing emails from one of your alledged member; Peter-Andrew Nolan(C), as you can see from the emails he has sent me below. I believe this man is very disturbed and if he is a member of yours I would appreciate you asking him not to contact me ever again.

I do not know this man and have never had anything to do with him. It is obvious that he has a problem with women and while that is his problem, I would appreciate it it if he didn't make it my problem.

I have asked him not to contact me again; which he has chosen to ignore and his foul mouth and threats are not warranted against me as I have never known him.

Peter Nolan claimed to be a part of your associaton Freemen of Australia after sending me an abusive letter and then invited me to become a part of your association.

If this is the case, then I believe you need to be aware of his psychotic antics and abuse against any woman whether he knows them or not.

I will also send you a copy of the other letters he has sent me and I believe that you will agree that he needs to stop emailing me as I have requested.

Thank you

Kind regards

Lyn Bennetts

 

 

 

New Post
 10/2/2011 11:23 PM
 



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 02 October 2011 12:20
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Cc: 'Lyn Bennetts'; 'dorraj robertson'; Bill Toal (bill_toal@hotmail.com); 'mick@micktoalbureau.com'; 'dublinnolans@gmail.com'; 'yotch-master@hotmail.com'; 'chris merrett'
Subject: Lyn Bennetts. Now revealed as a serial spammer, liar, hypocrite by one of the men on HER list


Gentlemen,

I received this email from on of the men on our list who is ALSO on Loud Mouthed Lyn Bennetts list.

 

“Lyn Bennetts has been spamming me for months Peter hundreds of annoying redneck emails. I asked her many times to take me off her email list, she just ignores me

 

She defamed you Peter in one email as per below to a group of people.

She is a redneck idiot.

 

I have reported her to Aust Comm and Media Authority on 28 September 2011 3:29:28 PM AEST for spamming me and I have warned her not to defame you Peter.

 

Cheers mate”

 

Now. To deal with her LIES in the email she has sent out.

 

“If you google Peter Nolan Phsycopath, this Chris guy I think may be an internal security ASIO agent; who is keeping a very close eye on Peter Nolan due to his recent threats to Julia Gillard. ”

 

The Peter Nolan Psychpath site has been up and running for about 12 months now. I want it to stay up and running. This is why it is still there. This is funded by ASIO meaning you tax dollars. Far from “threating” Julia Gillard I have written to her directly and said I will be accusing her of treason and that I will be asking the jury for the death penalty. Here is that letter.

 

http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.a...

 

Since Julia Gillard has claimed “equality” then she can suffer the same consequences men have suffered for MANY millennia when found guilty of TREASON. This, according to LYING LYN BENNETTS is called “threatening”.

 

“has actually explained to them at length of how to build a bomb and where is the best place to set it off with the most damage happening and in particular he is talking about women as the main target.”

 

False. Another lie. It was a very brief explanation pointing out that if men ever start thinking this way then women have no way to protect themselves.

 

“he has a screw or two loose and absolutely hates women.”

 

Another lie. Notice how women CLAIM HATRED OF WOMEN IN ORDER TO STIR UP HATRED OF MEN? They do this as reliably as a swiss watch.

 

 

“I received an email from Marlk Aldridge tonight as well and it looks like Peter Nolan has dedicated a hate website to Mark as well as to me;”

 

I have no idea what she is lying about here. Apparently, for lying loud mouthed Lyn Bennetts publishing HER HATEFUL emails is “hate” on my part. LOL!!!

 

 

Gentlemen.

I go to the time and trouble of collecting such information to show you JUST HOW BAD AUSTRALIAN WOMAN ARE.

 

Even those who CLAIM to want to help men are HATEFUL BITCHES who will tell lies and take the position that men are NOT ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW IF THE CRIMINAL IS A WOMAN.

 

I sure wish some more men would give me a hand.

 

I do actually have more important things to do and any man could easily collect such evidence and denounce women with it. Any man could point out the lies and hypocrisy of hateful bitches like lying loud mouthed Lyn Bennetts and the MANY women who are exactly like that!!

 

All I have EVER proposed is that “women who claim equality are treated as equal before the law as in same crime same punishment”.

 

Notice how upset the women AND MANGINAS are at this idea.

 

Best Regards

 

Peter

 

 

From:     Lyn Bennetts <lyn_bennetts7@bigpond.com>

             Subject:                 Google Peter Andrew Nolan

             Date:      27 September 2011 2:42:25 AM AEST

                To:          Lyn Bennetts <lyn_bennetts7@bigpond.com>

 

Thank you so much for your support everyone,

 

You may want to have a look at the website attributed to this nutcase personally and by others throughout Australia.

If you google Peter Nolan Phsycopath, this Chris guy I think may be an internal security ASIO agent; who

is keeping a very close eye on Peter Nolan due to his recent threats to Julia Gillard. Nolan has actually gone to

the lengths of explaining to other HONEST as he describes himself and his followers; as Honest Men, but he

has actually explained to them at length of how to build a bomb and where is the best place to set it off with

the most damage happening and in particular he is talking about women as the main target. He gave Julia Gillard

until the 1st of April to change the laws in the divorce courts or else, so the police and no doubt ASIO would definately

be watching him.

I stayed up last night and spent hours just reading the websites about him due to his threats to me and I really

think everyone needs to be vary careful of Peter Nolan; he has a screw or two loose and absolutely hates women.

 

I received an email from Marlk Aldridge tonight as well and it looks like Peter Nolan has dedicated a hate website to

Mark as well as to me; and dozen's of other women and men who he refer's to as Mangina's. He's a total loop but one we

should keep our eye on.

 

Just making sure we keep an eye out for each other is all, copied below is the email I received from this Peter Nolan

last night.

 

Thank you all so much

 

Kindest regards

 

Lyn Bennetts

 

 

 

 

Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneric Parent ForumGeneric Parent ForumEmail Conversat...Email Conversat...Liar and hypocrite Loud Mouthed Lyn BennettsLiar and hypocrite Loud Mouthed Lyn Bennetts