You are here:   Cases
Register   |  Login
Buy VPN

Cases

Minimize
 
ForumForumWashington Stat...Washington Stat...Washington State Parent ForumWashington State Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA026 Peter Nolan vs David BirminghamMBA-LS-AA026 Peter Nolan vs David Birmingham
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
New Post
 4/7/2013 10:28 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/24/2013 10:16:40 PM

MBA-LS-AA026 Peter Nolan vs David Birmingham

The attachments are the Affidavit of Accusation printed as a plain PDF and also as a signed and printed version.

I will be making a video and reading this in to evidence shortly.

The video for the affidavit is on this link.
MBA-LS-AA026-V01 Affidavit of Accusation Nolan vs Birmingham

The link to the the CAF entry for David Birmingham is here.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/u...
 LN20130408 - Notice to David Birmingham V0.1.SP.pdf
 LN20130408 - Notice to David Birmingham V0.1.pdf
New Post
 4/9/2013 10:50 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/9/2013 10:51:56 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan (IBI) [mailto:peter.nolan@instantbi.com]
Sent: 09 April 2013 19:49
To: 'info@brightlightconsulting.com'
Subject: Email to David Birmingham

Dear Sir/Madam,

this email is intended for the man calling himself David Birmingham. I would appreciate it if you would please pass this along.

Thank you.

Dear David,
I am writing to let you know I have now started the MBA Law Services case against you.

You can read the public Affidavit of Accusation against David Birmingham on this link.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/u...

You can listen to and read the entire affidavit of accusation on this link.

MBA-LS-AA026-V01 Affidavit of Accusation Nolan vs Birmingham

The Mens Business Association operates in Natural Law and Common Law jurisdictions. Our new MBA Law Courts offer the service of running jury trials according to Natural Law and the Common Law of the land on which the person accused of a crime committed the alleged crime.

You have been publicly accused, under oath and penalty of perjury, of being “remediator” and slandering me.

You have until the end of the month to decide what you will do.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9

Information Downloads
Video Channel
Education Channel
LinkedIn

 

 

New Post
 4/9/2013 10:51 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/9/2013 10:52:30 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan (IBI) [mailto:peter.nolan@instantbi.com]
Sent: 09 April 2013 19:49
To: 'info@brightlightconsulting.com'
Subject: Email to Mark Kettering

Dear Sir/Madam,

this email is intended for the man calling himself Mark Kettering. I would appreciate it if you would please pass this along.

Thank you.

Dear Mark,
I am writing to let you know about a public law case that is now in progress directed to one of your employees, namely one David Birmingham.

You can read the public Affidavit of Accusation against David Birmingham on this link.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/u...

You can listen to and read the entire affidavit of accusation on this link.

MBA-LS-AA026-V01 Affidavit of Accusation Nolan vs Birmingham

The Mens Business Association operates in Natural Law and Common Law jurisdictions. Our new MBA Law Courts offer the service of running jury trials according to Natural Law and the Common Law of the land on which the person accused of a crime committed the alleged crime.

I wanted to let you know this was happening as a matter of courtesy because it will potentially affect your company.

I reported David Birminghams criminal behaviour to your colleague David Overcash some time ago. However David saw fit not to take any action.

Perhaps you also want to ask David Overcash why he would not take any action when one of his employees is committing the crime of slander while representing your company.

Your situation is now this. One of your employees has bee publicly accused, under oath and penalty of perjury, of committing the crime of slander against me with a seeming agenda of disparaging me so as to affect my business.

It seems that David Birmingham is very upset that I have brought to market a product that has been used by two large Netezza Clients and has demonstrated that ETL subsystems can be built far more easily and far less expensively than ever before.

I can see why David Birmingham would feel threatened by our product SeETL. After all, it could vastly reduce his presumed importance on a project and could lead some netezza clients to ask the question as to why BrightLight have not come up with some similar idea or adopted such an innovative and valuable idea.

I would certainly be open to Brightlight looking in to what we have done. David Birmingham seems to have taken a look at what we have done and decided to attack the man because he could not attack the product. Very unprofessional.

In any case. Now that he has been presented with an Affidavit of Accusation under oath, penalty of perjury, and full commercial liability, he has until the end of the month to decide how he is going to respond.

Should he fail to respond I shall issue a Default Judgment against him and then, at my earliest convenience, empanel a jury to put his matter to the jury for their decision. As soon as the Default Notice is issued David Birmingham will become a guilty criminal. This has obvious implications for your business. You will have to decide if you wish to continue employment for a man who has been found guilty of the crime of slandering a competitor. That is your decision to make.

Should the matter go to trial and the Jury issue a guilty verdict and David Birmingham refuse to voluntarily make the Remedy Instruction issued by the jury he will become an outlaw because he will have denied the protection of the Common Law by refusing to comply with an instruction from a properly convened jury.

In this case this will affect your business because it is a crime in common law to aid and abet a known outlaw. Continued employment, in that case, would be a crime for which you would be held accountable.

My recommendation to you is this.

I recommend you sit down and have a talk with David Birmingham. Ask him yourself if he told these lies about me in public. If he admits to you that he told these lies in public I would recommend he make the very modest remedy payment. Should that happen we can all agree to put the slander behind us and compete in the marketplace like the professionals we all can be. I have made the remedy payment no more than a “slap on the wrist” just to make the point I do not like being slandered.

If he admits that he told these lies about me and refuses to make said remedy payment? Then you can be sure I will take him through a public trial process in the MBA Law Courts. In which case you are perfectly capable of making your own decisions as to your future association with him.

If he denies that he ever made these comments as “remediator”? I suggest you might question him a little more deeply about that. He is widely known to use the userid “remediator” on the ITTOOLBOX forums.


I will also let you know just to be sure you are aware of this. Now that Netezza is owned by IBM and IBM used to have strict policies about disparaging competitors you might want to talk to IBM and find out their latest position on business partners disparaging IBM competitors. I have not talked to anyone in IBM about those policies for many years. You most certainly do not want to run foul of IBM now they own Netezza.

Our Crimes Against Fathers site has seen a surge in readership over the last 6 months. From only 50,000 page views last September it has surged and we are consistently getting over 100,000 page views per month now. We are getting in excess of 8,000 unique IP addresses and entries in our forums are well indexed by google.

As we post cases and the CAF site grows it will garner more and more views from more and more people.

Due to the fact David Overcash did not see fit to deal with this matter in the private we shall deal with this problem in the public.

This means that David Birminghams case will appear in google searches and the link to our CAF site will be presented.

I am sorry that this has to be our first communication but such is life.

I am sure that we are both very professional men who can sort out such a small problem as an employee committing the crime of slander in a professional and amicable manner.

I wish you luck in your conversation with David Birmingham so you can establish the facts of the matter for yourself to your own satisfaction.

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9

Information Downloads

Video Channel
Education Channel
LinkedIn

 

 

New Post
 4/24/2013 2:43 AM
 
So..I have got David Birminghams attention. This video was taken down...the email from you tube follows.

Since David Birmingham claims his father was a prosecutor in the criminal cartel of the US Courts you would think that David knows a little bit about being publicly accused of a crime and being given the opportunity to defend himself in the public.

But did David do that? Nope. He ran like a child to you tube to get the video taken down. In all his interactions with me denouncing him for his slander David does the same thing. Runs like a child to the "authorities" and tells them lies to get them to do what he wants. 

I wonder why ANYONE would hire such a cowardly man for a consultant. David is all bluff and bluster...when someone stands up to him and points out he is a criminal slanderer David can not face his accuser. Coward. Period.

This cowardly effort to suppress the evidence against him will be added to the evidence that will be presented to the jury that we will empanel to hear his case. David is welcome to defend himself as best he can.  
New Post
 4/24/2013 2:44 AM
 
--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: YouTube Service <noreply@youtube.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM
Subject: Notification of action taken on your YouTube video
To: MBALawServices01@gmail.com


Regarding your account: MBALawServices

The YouTube Community has flagged one or more of your videos as inappropriate. Once a video is flagged, it is reviewed by the YouTube Team against our Community Guidelines. Upon review, we have determined that the following video(s) contain content in violation of these guidelines, and have been disabled:

MBA-LS-AA026-V01 Affidavit of Accusation Nolan vs Birmingham

For more information on YouTube's Community Guidelines and how they are enforced, please visit the help centerhttp://www.google.com/support/youtube....

Sincerely, 
The YouTube Team

©2013 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066
New Post
 10/30/2013 11:43 PM
 
And this is David Birmingham confessing in public that he is remediator.

This is the thread: 
http://datawarehouse.ittoolbox.com/gr...


Remediator replied 11 hours ago
Having written two books on Netezza and being directly associated with the product's implementation since '06 - and directly interacting with their internal technologists and product engineers - you would be hard-pressed to make a case within the walls of Netezza or IBM that PostGres has any relevance to the engine whatsoever. Your observations are entirely circumstantial and superficial, and have no bearing whatsoever on the internals of the engine. Where Postgres intersects with and keeps up with ANSI SQL, does this mean that Netezza doing the same thing is keeping up with Postgres and not ANSI SQL? Methinks you draw imaginary lines.
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
ForumForumWashington Stat...Washington Stat...Washington State Parent ForumWashington State Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA026 Peter Nolan vs David BirminghamMBA-LS-AA026 Peter Nolan vs David Birmingham