You are here:   Forums2
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Forums to Disseminate Information

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsIgnorMANus Parent ForumIgnorMANus Parent ForumMan-Hating Wome...Man-Hating Wome...Violent Man-Hating Women Paulette Johnson and Nancy SolomonViolent Man-Hating Women Paulette Johnson and Nancy Solomon
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 1/16/2012 4:04 AM
 
 Modified By Host2  on 6/6/2013 12:54:47 AM
I was looking through one group on LinkedIn, and I found a thread where a western woman named Paulette Johnson was asking other women "Should rapists be castrated?"

Paulette Johnson


Paulette Johnson's LinkedIn profile can be found here: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=132566101&authType=name&authToken=xPnR&goback=%2Egmp_3381279%2Eamf_3381279_132566101&trk=anetppl_profil

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?...


Paulette Johnson's personal website can be found here: http://www.pjohnsonwriting.com/

Paulette Johnson's personal email address is pj@pjohnsonwriting.com

I downloaded a screen shot of both her question and a reply by another man-hating feminist western woman named Nancy Solomon who also wrote a misandric anti-male comment.


Nancy Solomon

Nancy Solomon's LinkedIn profile can be found here: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?...

Nancy Solomon's personal website can be found here: http://www.nancysolomon.net/

Nancy Solomon's personal email address is nancy@nancysolomon.net

Nancy Solomon's contact numbers are as follows, so that you can personally call her and ask her why she is promoting violence against men:

773-706-0002 mobile
773-273-8070 landline

I also downloaded a screen shot of my reply to these man-hating feminists. I was using a fake account under the name Rebecca Neumann.

I have included both of those screen shots as attachments to this thread.

I request all men who read this to send an email to both of these violent man-hating feminists and ask them why they are promoting and encouraging violence against men. And if you really want to go a step farther, please research their LinkedIn pages and send emails to their present and previous employers, asking them why they employ man-hating women who promote and encourage violence against men?





If you want to actually be educated to the truth about feminism and how the governments have used feminism to enslave men, as well as the solution to how to become free from this tyranny? I suggest you download and read Peter Nolan's two free ebooks he wrote, they are only about 100 pages each:

Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World
http://mensbusinessassociation.com/Li...

The TRUTH Be Told
http://mensbusinessassociation.com/Li...


 my reply to hateful feminists.bmp
 man-hating feminists.bmp
New Post
 1/16/2012 4:24 AM
 
 Modified By Host2  on 1/15/2012 10:24:28 AM
Here is the email I sent to both women:

Dear Paulette Johnson and Nancy Solomon,

It was with great disturbance that I read your man-hating comment on LinkedIn, suggesting that men who are accused of rape should have their testicles cut off.

Why are you promoting violence against men?

Are you aware that women rape men?

And since you American women claim to be equal to men, it is only fair that men and women should suffer equal punishments for the same crimes. Otherwise, you claim of equality is total hypocrisy.

Therefore, if you are going to suggest that men who are convicted of rape should have their testicles removed, you should ALSO suggest that WOMEN who are convicted of RAPE should have their CLITORIS cut off.

Are you willing to promote that? After all, that is only fair, is you actually believe in EQUALITY.

Are you also aware that the majority of CHILD ABUSE is committed by WOMEN, according to US Government statistics?

So if you want to promote the removal of one's sexual organs as a punishment for rape and child abuse, then it appears that WOMEN will be far more subject to this punishment than men will.

Therefore, prove that you actually believe in EQUALITY and start promoting the idea that female rapists should have their clitoris cut off, just as you are presently promoting the idea that male rapists should have their testicles cut off.

You women are both clearly man-haters, promoting MISANDRY (hatred of men). American women are the biggest man-haters in the world. In America, tens of millions of men's lives have been destroyed by women who have falsely accused them of rape or domestic violence, women who have destroyed their ex-husbands financially through the divorce courts, and women who have destroyed their ex-husbands emotionally by kidnapping their children from them and refusing them to have any contact with their own children.

Many men commit suicide as a result of these crimes, especially the crime of having their own children kidnapped and forbidden contact with them.

I have found ZERO AMERICAN WOMEN who are willing to CONDEMN these crimes against fathers.

Therefore, it is fair to say that 100 PERCENT of AMERICAN WOMEN SUPPORT AND CONDONE these crimes. Thus, American women support men committing suicide. After all, you women refuse to speak out against these crimes or stop them.

This is why a growing number of American men are simply boycotting or avoiding you American women altogether.

I suggest you check out the website Boycott American Women to see what men are really saying about you American women.

In short, things aren't looking too bright for you American women. Most men are completely disgusted with you and sick of you. You really have only two options at this point:

1. become a lesbian

or

2. get used to living alone with your 10 cats

The majority of American men refuse to marry you American women, and this is proved by the fact that over 50 percent of American women are SINGLE, without a boyfriend or husband.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely,
John Rambo

PS. Both of your names and contact information have been added to the Man-Hating Women forum at the Crimes Against Fathers website: 

New Post
 1/16/2012 5:04 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 20:03
To: 'Indian Wife.com'; 'pj@pjohnsonwriting.com'; 'nancy@nancysolomon.net'
Subject: RE: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Dear Paulette,

As you can see we now have people who are spending their valuable time infiltrating your “Womens Only” groups where you preach your man hatred. We are now working hard to find public comments by women who hate men and who promote violence against men. You see, unlike you women, there are no government departments who are interested in reducing violence against men and the children of men. 

CDAW and VAWA are only concerned about WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN. You women claim that “equality” is about receiving BILLIONS of dollars in MENS TAX DOLLARS to subsidise your MAN-HATRED. Us men are forced to expose your man hatred on a shoestring. 

But I have a question for you. Why is the post addressed to “Women Only”? Given that your claim is that you want to discuss violent physical damage to MEN would it not be sensible to have the opinions of some MEN? Oh, that’s right, women don’t need the opinion of men because “women have a better way of knowing”, right? 

By the way? As a man who was criminally victimized by a woman who asked for a community supported path to justice for the kidnapping of my former children? Guess what? MOST western women HATE ON ME for asking for a community supported path to justice. 

How about you? Are you willing to make oath and serve on ALL WOMEN courts in ALL WOMEN juries and to fairly and justly try women who have been properly accused of crimes and if found guilty give the accuser, usually a father of his child, the SAME remedy instruction as you would were the sexes reversed? This is what men have done for thousands of years. You claimed equality. Your photo seems to indicate you are old enough to know what “equal before the law” means. 

I am interested in your reply as I will post it to CAF. 

No reply will indicate that you consent to the current practice of women committing crimes against fathers with impunity. 

Your brother peter. 

New Post
 1/16/2012 5:21 AM
 
Looks like poor wittle Nancy Solomon got her feelings hurt by someone suggesting to her that she should promote ACTUAL EQUALITY, instead of MISANDRY, MAN-HATRED. Here is the latest email exchange, where she said "I will alert the authorities". Here is my reply:


Big strong independent American woman who claims that she is independent from men, but as soon as some small problem occurs in her life, the first thing she does is call a MAN (police officer, fire department, plumber, TV repairman, etc). You bloody hypocrite. You are COMPLETELY DEPENDENT on MEN, and at the same time claiming that you are independent and don't need a man. What bloody hypocrites and utter morons you American women are.

Now, prove to me that you are actually LITERATE and are able to READ, and please read my email fully, and address the points I raised.

Otherwise, you are just showing yourself to be a mentally incapacitated hate-monger, encouraging and promoting violence against men.

I will also alert the authorities, that you are promoting violence against men. We will see how they feel about that.

Thank you and have a nice day.


From: Nancy Solomon <nancy@nancysolomon.net>
To: JohnRambo
Cc: "pj@pjohnsonwriting.com" <pj@pjohnsonwriting.com>; Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> 
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

I will alert the authorities. 

Sent from my iPhone
Nancy Solomon
773-706-0002 mobile
773-273-8070 landline
New Post
 1/16/2012 6:37 AM
 
So.....according to Nancy John Rambo is "an idiot" but she can't figure out who she is talking to and replying to.

Really. I can not make this up.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Solomon [mailto:nancy@nancysolomon.net]
Sent: 15 January 2012 20:20
To: Indian Wife.com
Cc: pj@pjohnsonwriting.com; Peter Nolan
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Peter, if you had read the post, a writer was merely gathering people's comments for an article about male rapists she was researching. I said that castration was not an answer because rape is an act of violence. Many male rapists don't ejaculate because rape is not a sex act. A castrated man will just use something else -- a broomstick, a knife, etc. what part of that makes me a man hater? I was responding to a question about men who rape. 

Sent from my iPhone

Nancy Solomon

773-706-0002 mobile

773-273-8070 landline

New Post
 1/16/2012 6:38 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 20:42
To: 'Indian Wife.com'; 'Nancy Solomon'
Cc: 'pj@pjohnsonwriting.com'
Subject: RE: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Dear Nancy,

As a man who was criminally victimized by a woman and the family courts and had my former children kidnapped and abused? As a man who has been HATED ON and dismissed by women just like you these last 4 years just because I demand a path to justice? 

Do you really think us men will be dissuaded by “you are an idiot”? 

What we are doing now is exposing such hatred and dismissal as yours to the young lads. 

Your photograph indicates you are old enough to know better than to attempt to dismiss a man as “you are an idiot”. 

We will make such comments known to other young men. We will make them known to your employers and prospective employers. Just like women have attempted to SLANDER me to my clients. 

Now. Here is a question for you. It is a very simple question. 

Are you willing to make oath and serve on ALL WOMEN courts in ALL WOMEN juries and to fairly and justly try women who have been properly accused of crimes and if found guilty give the accuser, usually a father of his child, the SAME remedy instruction as you would were the sexes reversed? This is what men have done for thousands of years. You claimed equality. Your photo seems to indicate you are old enough to know what “equal before the law” means. 

If so. You can register here. 

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/u... 

I am interested in your reply as I will post it to CAF. 

No reply will indicate that you consent to the current practice of women committing crimes against fathers with impunity. 

Your brother peter.

 

New Post
 1/16/2012 6:40 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 21:09
To: 'Nancy Solomon'; 'Indian Wife.com'
Cc: 'pj@pjohnsonwriting.com'
Subject: RE: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Hi Nancy,

Gee. “I will contact the authorities”? LOL!! 

You have gone for what is usually the third option so soon, eh? 

Normally. When faced with the question of “why are you promoting violence against men”, western women will:

1.      Tell lies

2.      Commit the crime of slander

3.      Then go to “I am so strong and independent I need to CALL SOME MEN to help me”.

 

But you are so strong and independent that you go to “I NEED TO CALL A MAN” inside a couple of emails. 

Well done for giving us more evidence for young men as to how “strong and independent” western women are. 

If you check CAF you will see that I have written to:

1.      The Queen

2.      Gordon Brown

3.      David Cameron

4.      Angela Merkel

5.      Kevin Rudd

6.      Julia Gillard

7.      Brian Cowan

8.      Mary McAleese

9.      Enda Kenny

10.  Ban ki-Moon

 

JUST to name a FEW people who know who I am and what I am doing. 

The US is not my particular territory. We are just getting started over there. 

So please. BY ALL MEANS please write to Barrack Obama and let him know that he will soon be hearing from us. 

If you are going to write to anyone below Barrack Obama? Please do not bother us with them. They are such minions that we are not interested in talking to them. Ok? 

Is your “women only” group also going to ask “Should we cut the breasts of women who are rapists or paedophile?” 

I don’t think so. 

Why? Because western women have proven that they will not put criminal women on trial. 

Your discussion is MAN-HATRED because you are talking about what agenda you will PROMOTE TO AND DEMAND FROM MEN to commit violence against men by playing “victim women” while at the SAME TIME you are not willing to hold women criminals accountable for their crimes. This is what “equality” means to women. And you are old enough to know this. 

How about you women deal with the criminals among yourselves before discussing whether you can play victim for the almost NON-CRIME of rape while supporting criminal women. 

Why is rape a virtual NON-CRIME? 

Because you women can not even come up with a definition of rape. 10,000 years and you can’t even define something? Can’t be very important can it? 

How about you women come up with a DEFINITION of rape BEFORE you call it a serious crime, eh? 

Rape is such a non-crime that MANY women who claim to have been “raped” actually have to had someone else explain to them this has happened. They have been so “traumatized” by the “crime” that they didn’t know they have been a victim of a crime until someone “explained” it to them!! How about that? 

You women have cried “wolf” or should I say “rape” so much that men are now questioning your sincerity and honesty as to your motives. 

After all. Almost NO women care about boys who are raped. Almost NO women care about MEN who are raped. Women are claiming ONLY women and girls can be raped and this is NOT TRUE. 

Women are so unsure as to the definition of rape that many among you consider that a wife who has been married to a man for many years who has children with this man can be “raped” if her husband “pressures” her into sex. 

Many women claim that this “crime” is no different to the same woman and mother being abducted from the local supermarket and being taken into the countryside and raped by a group of men she does not know who might have one of many diseases. 

Truly. I did not make that up. 

Apparently many women claim that these two crimes are EXACTLY THE SAME CRIME and deserve EXACTLY THE SAME PUNISHMENT. 

Of course, when a wife pressures her husband to have sex that is not “rape”, that is the man “getting lucky”. 

Nancy. The lies and hypocrisy you women peddle is being made public. 

The right thing to do is to accept that you have been condoning women criminals for a long time and to join CAF to assist us put criminal women on trial. 

The RIGHT thing to do is to live up to your claim that you wish to be held “equal before the law”. 

By the way? If you think anyone has any “authority” over me you are mistaken. 

I am a higher authority than any government agent and YOUR QUEEN has agreed to this. 

Your brother peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Solomon [mailto:nancy@nancysolomon.net]
Sent: 15 January 2012 20:13
To: Indian Wife.com
Cc: pj@pjohnsonwriting.com; Peter Nolan
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men? 

I will alert the authorities. 

Sent from my iPhone

Nancy Solomon

773-706-0002 mobile

773-273-8070 landline 

New Post
 1/16/2012 7:07 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 22:05
To: 'Nancy Solomon'
Cc: 'Indian Wife.com'; '<pj@pjohnsonwriting.com>'
Subject: RE: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Dear Nancy,

So. It is clear from your reply that you are not willing to hold women accountable for their crimes. Further, you take the position that you not only AGREE with women committing the crimes of perjury, kidnapping, extortion, theft and child abuse? You think that a man writing you emails questioning your authenticity and honesty is a “crime” called “stalking”. 

And I presume you will promote VIOLENCE BY PROXY by trying to get the CRIMINAL THUGS called “police” to do your dirty work for you by pretending that you are a “victim”, eh? 

Thank you for your evidence of what a bunch of liars and hypocrites most western women are now. You have made it pretty clear to any young lad reading this you are a liar and a hypocrite. And should any man attempt to defend you we will put his details into the IgnorMANus forum. 

Here is why asking “should we castrate rapists” is such a HATEFUL question even to ask and why us men take exception to it. 

What is a “rapist” according to women? 

Let me describe a situation. 

A man who is a loving and dedicated husband and father who stays at home with his kids to let his wife have the “glamorous career” decides to make a lovely candle-light dinner for her birthday.  They put the kids to bed early and he serves the 5 course meal and matches the wine with the menu. As far as he is aware he is doing all his wife has asked for. She has never expressed any issues or problems to him about the marriage. He is doing all he is asked. She sends him love letters on her travels and she consistently tells him that she loves him and wants to live with him forever. 

She is delighted he has taken so much effort for her birthday. 

Later in the evening they have fully consensual sex. 

But she has found a richer man from the office and she thinks she can dump the husband and get a new husband in the guy from the office. She has been secretly having an affair with the other man as it is so easy to manage under the cover of work. 

She has secretly been seeing a divorce lawyer and she is in the final stages of springing this “surprise” on her husband. 

Later that week she talks to her divorce lawyer and SHE is delighted that hubby made the dinner. The woman asks why? And the lawyer says…. “Well, you had three or four alcoholic drinks at your birthday dinner and you had sex afterwards. Given you had that alcohol and then had sex there was no possibility you could consent so your husband raped you.” 

So you can allege that he raped you and he is actually guilty by law. So he will immediately be removed from the house.

You can threaten him with the rape allegation in the family court using the in camera rule, remember he is guilty, so you can dictate terms to him on the threat of putting him in jail for 10-15 years. That dinner was the best thing that ever happened to you in divorce!!! Men are so stupid!!!
 

Now….The man is now GUILTY OF RAPING HIS WIFE and this can be used against him to remove him from his house, steal his children, steal his future income. 

This is not even a FALSE rape allegation that so many men have to endure. 

And women ALSO want to discuss whether this man should be castrated?!?!?!?! 

And that you do NOT see that as HATRED and promoting violence against LOVING AND CARING FATHERS AND HUSBANDS is what the problem actually is. 

For the most part women do not even KNOW when they are being HATEFUL and are PROMOTING VIOLENCE. 

And that is what we are pointing out to the lads. 

The definition of “rape” has been extended to include “any consensual sex where alcohol has been consumed” as well as “sex that is regretted at a later date” or “sex achieved by co-ersion”. You know what co-ersion is, it is where a man asks MORE THAN ONCE to have sex with a woman. 

And you women wonder why so many people are recommending that all sex with a western woman be video recorded. 

Recently in New Zealand a woman made a false rape allegation against a man. Remember. He’s look at 10-15 years for that. He had taken the advice of video recording all sexual encounters and was able to PROVE she was LYING. What happened? She was allowed to go FREE despite her PURJURY and HE was charged with video recording her without her expressed consent despite the fact they were in HIS BEDROOM! 

And you women NEVER SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THESE CRIMINAL WOMEN. 

Your brother peter .

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Solomon [mailto:nancy@nancysolomon.net]
Sent: 15 January 2012 20:53
To: <peter@peternolan.com>
Cc: Indian Wife.com; <pj@pjohnsonwriting.com>
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

 

I've read about you on the Net. Stop communicating with me in any way right now. Any communications from you or any of your contacts from now on is stalking.  

Sent from my iPhone

Nancy Solomon

773-706-0002 mobile

773-273-8070 landline

 

New Post
 1/16/2012 7:15 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paulette Johnson [mailto:pjohnsonwriting@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 21:59
To: Indian Wife.com
Cc: pj@pjohnsonwriting.com; nancy@nancysolomon.net; Peter Nolan
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Wow.  I'm not promoting anything.  I simply asked a question. 

John Rambo, if you filed my name with any man-hating forums please have it removed.   I love men - I'm very happily married to a fabulous man whom I have respected and supported emotionally and mentally for 39 years.  I just hate pedophiles and rapists.  

Any future communication from Peter Nolan, John Rambo,  or IndianWife will be viewed as harassment and stalking.  

New Post
 1/16/2012 7:29 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 22:29
To: 'Paulette Johnson'
Cc: 'pj@pjohnsonwriting.com'; 'nancy@nancysolomon.net'; 'Indian Wife.com'
Subject: RE: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men?

Dear Paulette, 

“ I just hate pedophiles and rapists.  ” 

Remember that a “rapist” is a man who asks the woman he loves and is married to and has children with for sex after she has had two glasses of wine. 

THAT is a “rapist”. 

That you are willing to admit that you HATE such men is what men like John Rambo and I object to. 

Why do you HATE loving caring fathers and husbands just because their wife drinks two glasses of wine before they make love or have sex? 

Can you please explain that to me? 

Do you have ANY idea how HATEFUL that occurs to us men? 

Remember. 

You women claim it is NOT POSSIBLE for a woman to consent to sex after a woman consumes alcohol but if the SAME WOMAN gets into a car and drives it she IS considered responsible for THOSE actions. 

You are a woman. 

How about you and Nancy write some articles as to why it should be that even though women are “equal” to men that they can be held responsible for their action in driving a car having consumed alcohol but can not be held accountable for their actions in a bed room having consumed alcohol. 

Perhaps you should talk to my friend Maggie who also happens to be a woman writer. 

She points out that the guvment is offering women the “privilege” of being considered “imbeciles” when it comes to sex and being reduced to the lawful status of children needing the “guvment parent” to take care of them by giving them the ability to “cry rape” for any reason they like including gaining an advantage in divorce. I have great respect for Maggies opinions as she has published them. 

http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/ 

By the way. Trying to threaten me with “authorities” is laughable. 

The “athorities” are scared witless of me. 

Your brother peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paulette Johnson [mailto:pjohnsonwriting@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2012 21:59
To: Indian Wife.com
Cc: pj@pjohnsonwriting.com; nancy@nancysolomon.net; Peter Nolan
Subject: Re: Why are you ladies promoting physical violence against men? 

Wow.  I'm not promoting anything.  I simply asked a question.  

John Rambo, if you filed my name with any man-hating forums please have it removed.   I love men - I'm very happily married to a fabulous man whom I have respected and supported emotionally and mentally for 39 years.  I just hate pedophiles and rapists.   

Any future communication from Peter Nolan, John Rambo,  or IndianWife will be viewed as harassment and stalking.  

New Post
 1/16/2012 7:20 PM
 
 Modified By Host2  on 1/16/2012 1:21:42 AM
Well, a new man-hating woman named Denise Rutledge from Portland, Oregon, USA, has joined in the fray.

Denise's LinkedIn profile is here: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?...

And you can contact her here: http://writingasaghost.com/contact.html


She replied to the thread at LinkedIn as follows:

Denise Rutledge • "Rebecca" or should I say "John," not only have you spammed our forum with blatant advertising, your posting of member's personal information is an aggressive action that suggests you hate women as much as you accuse Paulette and Nancy of hating men. You have violated the core purpose of this writer's forum. 

You have admitted to "infiltrating" LinkedIn under a false identity. This is in violation of your LinkedIn agreement Section 7 paragraph B. 

Paulette has posted a survey and made it clear that the purpose of the survey is to research for an article. This in itself does not make her a man hater. 

For the record, I am opposed to physical castration as this does not alter the thinking of a man who uses rape to express his hatred for women. It would only increase his anger and lead to finding some other way to express it. I believe you have misunderstood Nancy's statement. I understand her comment to mean that removing a man's body parts isn't a solution because rape is usually rooted in something other than sexual desire. 

Also for the record,I believe women should be held accountable for their crimes against men, women and children, just as men should be. Mutilation isn't a solution for either gender. 

I certainly hope my opinion isn't going to be reported as a crime against fathers. I happen to love the fathers in my life very much. I've been blessed with three very caring and supportive men.


HERE is my reply to this man-hating sexist woman Denise:

Rebecca Neumann • Denise, you say " I am opposed to physical castration as this does not alter the thinking of a man who uses rape to express his hatred for women."

Have you missed my entire point? According to US GOVERNMENT STATISTICS, AMERICAN WOMEN commit the majority of CHILD ABUSE AND CHILD MOLESTATION IN AMERICA.

Therefore, WHY do you man-hating women KEEP INSISTING ON FRAMING THIS DEBATE IN TERMS OF "IT'S ONLY MEN WHO RAPE"?

Denise, how can you claim to be equal to men, and yet at the same time only address ONE SIDE OF THE ISSUE? Are you SEXIST? Clearly, you are.

Therefore, prove to everyone on here that you are NOT SEXIST, and NOT A MAN-HATER, and make the following statements:

* am opposed to physical removal of the CLITORIS as this does not alter the thinking of a WOMAN who uses rape to express HER hatred for MEN.

and

1. I understand her comment to mean that removing a WOMAN's body parts isn't a solution because rape is usually rooted in something other than sexual desire.

I have added your infomation and a screen shot of your comment to the thread over at Crimes Against Fathers about this topic, and until you are willing to PROVE that you CONDEMN both MALE and FEMALE!!!! CRIMINALS EQUALLY, I will NOT remove your information. Talk is cheap. Actions speak louder than words.

And as for your statement, "Also for the record,I believe women should be held accountable for their crimes against men, women and children, just as men should be."

Oh? You are the FIRST of American women to actually express such a belief. Every single other American/western woman we have asked to HOLD FEMALE CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABLE TO THE SAME STANDARDS AS MALE CRIMINALS has REFUSED TO DO SO and spewed nothing but hatred at us.

So, prove that you are willing to put your money where your mouth is. SIGN UP FOR ALL FEMALE JURIES to put your fellow female criminals on trial at CAF. Here is the link:

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/u...

Since you claim that you believe both men and WOMEN should be held EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW, I expect you to sign up there. Thanks


I HAVE ATTACHED A SCREEN SHOT OF BOTH HER COMMENT AND MY REPLY TO THIS THREAD. 
 reply to Denise.bmp
 Denise comment.bmp
New Post
 1/16/2012 11:14 PM
 
 Modified By host  on 1/16/2012 5:37:17 AM
So Nancy Solomon has chosen to say things about me in public and I will record them here.

The link here here but just in case she removes it the screen shot is attached.

Nancy says:

“I’m pretty sure he’s loony. I’m not sure he’s dangerous to anyone except his ex-wife, but you never know. I consider him a stalker.”

Hmm. Interesting comments. Nancy has no evidence that I am “loony” but that does not stop her from forwarding that opinion.

She implies I am dangerous to my ex wife. This would be despite the fact that I told FOUR men who wished my wife harm that they were absolutely forbidden to do so and she has remained under my word for protection these last FOUR years from men who WISH to cause her harm for her criminal acts including child abuse.

And “I consider him a stalker”. Is this of the same kind of “consider as” I consider him to be santa clause? After all? Stalking is a crime and there are definitions of it. Being many thousands of kilometres away and exposing Nancy as a man hater is not stalking in the minds of anyone but the mentally feeble. Which obviously includes Nancy. Notice how quickly a western woman goes from "strong" and "empowered" and "independent" to "victim". They can do this in the blink of an eye over a couple of emails. How about that? This is their equality".

If Nancy does not want men taking objection to her public comments and publishing them then she might think twice about her public comments. Especially hateful comments.

In her discussions on rape she fails to discuss women who rape men, boys and girls. She fails to mention that “rapists” include loving husbands and fathers whos wives have a couple of glasses of wine over the dinner prepared by the man. The very fact that a wife has a few glasses of wine and then has consensual sex with her husband, in MANY places, makes the husband a rapist.

If the criterion is consensual sex after some alcohol I was raped by my wife MANY times in our 23 years together.

Nancy fails to discuss the cases where wives rape their husbands. Rape is defined in MANY places as achieving sex by “coercion”. This means badgering a person after they have said no to sex until they say yes. But this definition I have been raped MANY times by my wife.

Nope. “Rape” in the “research for an article” is framed as if only men rape women and then it is only about domination, control and violence. This is very hateful against men as the definition of rape is FAR broader than that and so the discussion on rapists must, for balanced discussion, be FAR broader than the VERY few men who do rape women using violence.

How about some BALANCED discussion about rape Nancy? Or is that too much for you women to do.

And by the way? What do you women know about men who rape women anyway? And why would your opinion even be worth listening to? Why don’t you talk about women who rape men and boys and girls? Surely you would be more expert in that area, right? And why don’t you write about women who “rape” men in the divorce courts. You should know all about that. The material is plentiful.

We are tired of you women being so hateful and broadening the definition of “rape” so far that virtually ALL men and women are “rapists” and then talking about “rapists” that are less than 0.1% of the total set of people who are defined to be “rapists”.

It is gross intellectual dishonesty to frame the arguments like that and you know it.

Now so do us men and we are no longer tolerating it.

 z01-nancy_solomon_response_01.jpg
New Post
 1/16/2012 11:44 PM
 
And here is a response from Paulette on the thread. Notice that it seems to be a voting thread where she is asking the question as to whether men should be castrated if they are rapists.

I would like to be clear I am not questioning her right to ask questions, any question she likes, or her right to run polls. 

I am merely pointing out that by framing the question and the discussion about "rapists" in the vein of should they be castrated immediately removes discussion about women who are rapists. It also removes the discussion about loving husbands and fathers who are rapists by way of the definition of rape being so expanded that it includes normal husbands.

The intellectual dishonesty and the promotion of violence against men is by asking a question that covers a VERY large portion of the population but frame the answer as only affecting a very SMALL portion of the population. And that Paulette is provoking the yes no answer promotes the idea of violence against men in those who are voting.

This is a very normal way to stir up hatred. The communists use it. The nazis used it. And now Paulette is using it.

She is in good company, eh?
 z01_paulette_response_01.jpg
New Post
 1/17/2012 12:11 AM
 
Here is the latest replies on the thread on LinkedIn, this time coming from two men, one of whom is a self proclaimed Masculinist.

New Post
 1/17/2012 5:32 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 1/16/2012 11:40:03 AM
Nigel wrote to me directly. This is his email.

From: Nigel Lewis-Davidson [xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 January 2012 14:51
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Posting on Your Forum http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums2/tabid/369/forumid/232/threadid/1459/scope/posts/Default.aspx

Hi Peter

I am neither a member of your site nor in Australia and I am not sure whether I would be eligible to become a member although I am a father and do believe I have integrity.


The above post on your Forum2 beggars belief. I have read through the discussion on LinkedIn and see no justification in the action your member, John Rambo or Rebecca Neumann, the name used on LinkedIn, has taken even if it would normally be acceptable.


Please will you step in and remove the posting as John/Rebecca is using your name and that of your site to justify his/her comments; I feel this is totally derogatory to your cause for which I have some sympathy.


The original discussion thread is @ http://lnkd.in/GYKm_2 so you can read the comments as they were published.


I hope common sense prevails and wish you all the best.


Nigel Lewis-Davidson


Without sadness happiness would become mundane!

New Post
 1/17/2012 5:39 AM
 
This is my response to Nigel.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 16 January 2012 17:21
To: 'Nigel Lewis-Davidson'
Cc: 'Indian Wife.com'
Subject: RE: Posting on Your Forum http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums2/tabid/369/forumid/232/threadid/1459/scope/posts/Default.aspx

Hi Nigel,

thank you for your email. I appreciate the effort. I understand your concerns.

 

Just to let you know. CAF is a global resource and if you live in any one of the english speaking lands you are welcome to join as an indication you are making oath to serve on new juries in new courts to provide the protection of the law to any father or his child who has been the victim of a crime. Our current courts are a total scam and so we are creating new courts.

We are almost there in Australia. You can see the Australian site is well developed. If you are really in the UK (btinternet) we do have a UK site.

 

As a father it might interest you to know that in the UK the concept that the father is the natural guardian of their children has been abolished and your child can be taken from you at any time for any reason by your government. All it takes is a false allegation from some vindictive woman. Many of your fellow fathers have had their children stolen and lives destroyed. If you wish to join in defending their rights? Click here.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/

 

 

On to your concern.

 

"John Rambo" is his own man. I have no say over what he does. I sometimes make suggestions to him as I do any other men. Since I am much older sometimes he even takes my suggestions and sometimes he does not.

 

As the owner of CAF the say I have over CAF is that any posting made to CAF is done under oath and the man is posting in good faith. No deliberate lies will be allowed. In the event he makes a mistake he posts the retraction in the SAME PLACE he posted the mistake. If a man commits slander or perjury in posting to CAF then he knows he will be prosecuted by the very same courts we are setting up to prosecute criminals. If anyone feels they have been slandered they are welcome to deal with that allegation using the procedure manual provided.

Example. I made a mistake just last week when a google search for the name of a retired brigadier in Australia had a hit with the ex head of security in ASIO in Australia. I mistakenly thought the Brigadier had served as the head of security in ASIO. These were actually two different men with the same name except for the middle name. An easy mistake to make. So I published the retraction right there next to the mistake. Then other people are less likely to make the same mistake. This is how we do this.

 

“as John/Rebecca is using your name and that of your site to justify his/her comments;”

As far as I am aware John is not posting anything in my name. He has used my name and referred to me and has referred to CAF but I can not believe he is passing himself off as me.

As far as justifying his comments? John does not need my site to justify his comments. What he says is what he says and he has a mountain of evidence to back up what he says, most of it NOT on my site. If you believe he has said something untrue then please let him know as if he is mistaken he will thank you for pointing it out. I have never known John to make a mistake but it does happen, just like me last week.

 

"The above post on your Forum2 beggars belief. "

 

If you think that this entry "beggars belief" perhaps you should take a look at how women talk about us men, especially fathers.  Links below. I have women OPENLY state that with respect to the men who have killed themselves from the extensive criminal abuse of the family courts, the kidnapping of their children and the destruction of their lives “I could not give a rats arse about those men”.

Now how hateful is it to say you do not give a rats arse about a man who killed himself? If a man said he did not give a rats arse about a woman who killed herself after being beaten and raped we all know there would be a great outcry from women. But such language is commonly used by women against men and it is very hateful. These men are victims of crimes. This is not an isolated event. Many women today express opinions of men that we are lower and of lesser worth than dogs. You may be oblivious to such comments. Most men are. John and I and MANY men are not. www.the-spearhead.com.

Nigel.

Women have claimed "equality" for near 40 years now. Therefore we are free to talk to them like men. They are accorded no special privilege of being spoken to "politely" or "civilly" just because they are women.

Further. Women speak to men in the most horrible of ways nowadays. For example. I have been openly falsely accused of being a wife beater, a paedophile and a dead beat father. All lies. I have even had women call for my death. Women today will commit the crime of slander at the drop of a hat.

So rather than ask me to tone down Johns posts a little? How about I reverse that and ask you to seek out women who are promoting hatred against you and other men and have them tone down there comments a little? Will you do that for me please? Would you do it for yourself? If you have a son will you do it for him?

 

Here are some examples of threads from women that are full of lies and hatred. I have been on the receiving end of this for FOUR YEARS. I am yet to see anyone write to the women involved and suggest that slander is perhaps not the best approach. Now we are “going on the front foot” if you like cricket and we are addressing the promotion of violence and hatred against men and boys were we find it the women call this “stalking” so as to try and shut the conversation down.

Many men are very sexist. They will ask a man to stop talking to women when the women claim upset but they will not hold women accountable for crimes when the women commit crimes against men even when it is kidnapping the mans children. And that is pretty sexist don’t you think?  

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

“I feel this is totally derogatory to your cause for which I have some sympathy.”

You may feel this but that does not make it a fact. Feelings are not facts. We deal in facts.

 

My “cause” if you want to call it that is the re-introduction of the rule of law into Australia and Ireland. Other men have taken on the same cause in other countries. ONE reason for doing this is to defend the rights of fathers who are being criminally victminised.

Indeed. You say you are a father and I think you are in the UK so part of this “cause” if you wish to call it that is to ensure that if ever your right to be the father you choose to be is violated we will be there for you to remedy that violation of your rights. Might my "cause" not also be your? Might you not think it is worthwhile to ensure your children will come to adulthood in a land where they have the protection of the law? There is no protection of law in the UK today.

It has taken me many years to get this far because most fathers do not wish to safeguard their rights. They mistakenly think the legal system does that. But since the legal system has abolished fatherhood as a concept there can be no defense of your rights in your family courts.

No less than Bob Geldof has called the UK Family Law system a criminal organisation. I agree with him. I have proven it is a criminal organisation in Ireland and Australia.

Almost every day I get new fathers in Australia who are coming to me and desperately asking me to help them with their individual case. One recent case? A man had his little three year old girl murdered by the mother after he had tried over and over again to gain custody of the girl because he could see she was being beaten by the mother and thug boyfriend. Even the womans BROTHER went with him trying to get the child removed.  

 

The man obviously wants those who killed his little girl brought to justice and wants those who refused to hand her over to him brought to justice.

Both his parents are dead and he was an only child so his little girl is all he had in the world after his wife betrayed him in leaving him for another man. The “thug boyfriend”.

 

This case really broke my heart because it was very recent. If we had more men willing to stand up we could have saved the life of this mans little girl. But we couldn’t.

This month some little boy or little girl will be murdered that we could have stopped if we had more men willing to sit on these new courts sooner. We are in a race against time.

I would also mention that in Australia the best estimate we have is 12 men kill themselves every day from the criminal abuse of the family law system. Every day we do not have these courts we have to accept 12 men JUST LIKE YOU kill themselves in Australia. The number is more likely to be about 40 per day or more in the UK. I bet you never hear about them.

Yet you think the post from John beggars belief? I do not. Knowing what I know? He is actually showing some serious restraint.

 

What about all those dead men. One of which you could easily be one day. I was suicidal for a month when my children were kidnapped and abused.

 

Many of the fathers on CAF have been criminally abused and not seen their kids for years. In one case SEVEN YEARS.

Now that men are starting to point out how all this man hatred is generated the women are upset and many men come to their “rescue”.

So I would ask you to consider how many dead men, how many dead children, how much social destruction and chaos has been wrought by women who promote and incite hatred of men.

 

Many such women are not even aware that they are doing this it has become so “normal”.

 

The poll and the discussion is hateful of men. The women claim they don't even know it. John is doing all men a favour in pointing out WHY their discussion is hateful.

Best Regards

Your brother peter

 

 

PS. I have just asked to join this discussion and it was, as is usual for hateful women, removed.

 

There were comments such as "rape is about violence" which is a very hateful comment because that only refers to the VERY small percentage of rapes that involve men and violence. The VAST majority of cases of "rape" that now fit the legislation definition of rape in the west are NON violent. Indeed MOST men and women are "rapists" according to western legislation.

Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsIgnorMANus Parent ForumIgnorMANus Parent ForumMan-Hating Wome...Man-Hating Wome...Violent Man-Hating Women Paulette Johnson and Nancy SolomonViolent Man-Hating Women Paulette Johnson and Nancy Solomon