You are here:   Forums2
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Forums to Disseminate Information

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Forums Parent ForumGeneral Forums Parent ForumOpen LettersOpen LettersOpen letter to the men of the World Citizen GroupOpen letter to the men of the World Citizen Group
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 11/16/2011 12:48 AM
 

Open letter to the men of the World Citizen Group.
Open letter from: Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
Sovereign

Gentlemen,
The time has come for me to have a real ‘go’ at getting the World Passport accepted in the UK and Germany.

I am using the ancient technique of Affidavit and negative presumption. That is, the party who makes the positive presumption has the burden of proof. The UK and Germany claim to be allowed to refuse me the ability to travel on the land known as England and Germany.

I have claimed the right of travel in my Notice of Understanding, Intent, and Claim of Right. You can read it here:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.a...

I claim that whoever created me clearly implied that I had freedom of travel because ‘God’ did not create countries or border patrols. If God did not create them? Who did? Men did. And if Men did? They only apply to me if I consent. And I do not consent.

These Guvments will argue that they need to control ‘all people coming and going’ for the ‘safety of others’. Well? I have made an oath that I will not cause any injury harm or loss to others and should I do so by accident I will make remedy. So the ‘guvments’ are not protecting anyone by claiming to have the right to violate my right of travel.

In the posts below you can see the affidavits that I have presented to each party.

I ask all men who are wishing to assist me in getting the World Passport accepted as a passport that establishes the RIGHT of travel to please write to Angela Merkel and David Cameron and DEMAND that they publish their reply to these Affidavits and tell them that you are very keen to see them explain their position as to how legislation can be applied to a sovereign man who has rescinded his consent to be governed and made oath to live life as a peaceful man.

Please assist me in this. The more letters that drop onto the desk of David Cameron and Angela Merkel over the next few days the better.

It’s only a letter. It will only take you an hour to write and post. It will cost you a couple of dollars. But if I am successful we will have a new passport that can be used for travel. Something WELL worth your effort of an hour or two.

Here is a sample letter you might want to send. Feel free to ‘make it your own’.

Dear Angela,
It has been brought to my notice that a sovereign man calling himself Peter-Andrew: Nolan© has recently sent you an Affidavit asserting that he has seen no evidence that the German Federal Republic has any lawful right to impede his travel or living on the land commonly known as Germany. 

I have read his documentation and I must say I am fascinated at his assertions. I have also noted that he has managed to make great progress in other areas with governments using these assertions.

I am very keen to see your response to his assertion that the German Federal Republic actually has such lawful right to prevent a man sworn to living in peace and harmony travel or living on the land commonly known as Germany. I would love it if your staff would post your response here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WorldCi...

 Further, I am very disturbed that someone calling himself Christop Schmidt is alleged to have written to Peter words to the effect:

For completeness I inform you that the United Nations´ Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important document, but it does not – and was never supposed to – contain legally binding provisions.

I would ask you to please confirm or deny, under oath, whether the United Kingdom has a legal obligation to uphold the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It was my belief that it did. And I will only accept your oath that this is the case. A letter will not be enough.

I look forward to seeing your public reply to this public assertion that the German Federal Republic does not have lawful right to refuse a mans claimed and established right to live anywhere on this land that God gave us.

Best Regards

John Smith

 

 

 

Dear David,
It has been brought to my notice that a sovereign man calling himself Peter-Andrew: Nolan© has recently sent you an Affidavit asserting that he has seen no evidence that the United Kingdom has any lawful right to impede his travel on the land commonly known as England. 

I have read his documentation and I must say I am fascinated at his assertions. I have also noted that he has managed to make great progress in other areas with governments using these assertions.

I am very keen to see your response to his assertion that the United Kingdom actually has such lawful right to prevent a man sworn to living in peace and harmony travel on the land commonly known as England. I would love it if your staff would post your response here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WorldCi...

Further, I am very disturbed that Peter claims that the ‘United Kingdom’ is actually a corporation that was incorporated during the second world war and was never un-incorporated.  A corporation may not run a country.  I ask that you also make public your position, under oath, as to whether the United Kingdom is a corporation. Even that there IS something that is a corporation known as the United Kingdom because any such corporation must be plagiarising what most men commonly understand to be a sovereign nation. 

I look forward to seeing your public reply to this public assertion that the United Kingdom does not have lawful right to refuse a mans claimed and established right to live anywhere on this land that God gave us.

Best Regards

John Smith

New Post
 11/16/2011 12:49 AM
 

Lawful Notice To Respondent:

The human being calling herself Angela Merkel 
also acting as the Chancellor of Germany
Deutscher Bundestag
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin

Germany

 

8th November 2010

 

 

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

`

Notice to principal is notice to agent.

Notice to agent is notice to principal.

 

I, commonly addressed by the calling of Peter-Andrew: Nolan©, hereinafter the “Principal”, in my correct public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realized and free sentient man, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and not misleading, so help me God.

 

This Notice is addressed to the human being calling herself Angela Merkel also acting as the Chancellor of Germany.

 

AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO
LIVING ON THE LAND KNOWN AS GEMANY BY
THE MAN KNOWN AS Peter-Andrew: Nolan©

 

 

1.                  Principal is of legal age and competent to testify.

 

2.                  Principal has first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3.                  Principal makes oath that he wrote a Letter to Respondent on or about 18/11/2009 and placed it into the Royal Mail on or about 19/11/2009. A copy of this letter is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.
















4.                  Principal makes oath that he received the following email reply on 21/01/2010 and sincerely believes this reply to have been sent by the human being calling himself Christoph Schmidt as presented.

Dear Mr. Nolan,

thank you for your letter dated 18 November 2009 which I gladly answer as follows on behalf of Chancellor Angela Merkel:

According to Section 3 Para 1 of the German Residence Act (“Aufenthaltsgesetz”) citizens of foreign States may enter the Federal Republic of Germany if they are in possession of an approved and valid passport. The so-called “World Passport” issued by a private organization which you refer to in your letter is no such document. It has not been approved by the Federal Republic of Germany and is therefore not accepted as an official travel document.

Contrary assertions on the website you cite (www.worldservice.org) are incorrect. Furthermore, the Federal Republic of Germany is not aware of any other foreign States´ approval of the so-called "World Passport". Please note that even the website you refer to only mentions alleged "de facto" recognitions (as opposed to official approvals) by stamps on the passport´s pages.

For completeness I inform you that the United Nations´ Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important document, but it does not – and was never supposed to – contain legally binding provisions. Against this background I can assure you that a human rights violation has not taken place and that the German Border Authorities acted lawfully and fully adequate. You are welcome to use an Australian passport that meets the German law for entry into the Federal Republic of Germany.

Sincerely
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Im Auftrag
gez. Christoph Schmidt
Bundesministerium des Innern - Bürgerservice-Zentrum -
E-Mail:
Buergerservice@bmi.bund.de
www.bmi.bund.de
www.d115.de

5.                  Principal makes oath that he wrote a Letter in Care of Respondent to Christoph Schmidt on or about 02/03/2010 and placed it into the Royal Mail on or about 02/03/2010. A copy of this letter is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.

6.                  Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
Principal is a ‘citizen of a foreign state’ and not, in fact, the living breathing spirit of a man and sincerely believes none exists.

7.                  Principal makes oath that he completed a claim of right that included freedom of travel across the entire planet commonly known as the earth as well as the default judgement for that claim of right to the Queen of The Federal Republic of Germany (yes, she is your queen too) and that your Queen failed to counter claim and therefore my right of freedom of travel across the entire planet known as earth is lawful and may no longer be rebutted. 

A copy of this document is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.

8.                  Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The legal entity calling itself “The Federal Republic of Germany” has any lawful right to interfere with my claimed and established right of travel across the entire planet commonly called the earth and sincerely believes none exists.





9.                  Principal makes oath ….  

10.              Principal makes oath …..

11.              Principal makes oath …..

12.              Principal makes oath …….

13.              Principal makes oath …….

14.              Principal makes oath that he will at no time call upon the resources of “The Federal Republic of Germany” and seeks no “free assistance” or “social welfare” from “The Federal Republic of Germany”. Principal makes oath that he is willing to pay a fair and reasonable amount for any offered services of “The Federal Republic of Germany” that Principal might choose to use in the currency known as EUROs.

15.              Principal makes oath that he is one of the world leaders in his area of expertise (Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing) and that he has substantial income generating capability from the software he has authored and the consulting services he can provide to his clients. Evidence of such can be viewed on www.peternolan.com and his former company site www.instantbi.com.

16.              Principal makes oath ………..

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, the free man on the land commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan© standing in Gods Kingdom do hereby clearly, specifically and unequivocally claim my God given right to make my home in any place in Gods Kingdom that I choose. Further, I claim that “The Federal Republic of Germany” has no right to interfere with my right of travel or right to live where I choose.

Further Principal saith not,

 

As Good As AVAL      _______________________________________________________ 
                                    Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of

                                    the Original Jurisdiction. Third party Intervener and aggrieved party.

 

Done this...................Day of the Eleventh Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno Domini, (8th November AD2010) near London, England.

 

 

JURAT:

ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of London, on this day personally appeared before me Peter-Andrew: Nolan© known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who executed the foregoing instrument acknowledged to me that Peter-Andrew: Nolan© executed the same as his free act and deed as true, correct complete and not misleading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KNOW all men that I, ______________________________ of  London, England, at the request of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Eighth Day of November 2010 Anno Domini, witness the above autograph of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© before

_____________________________________ and

_____________________________________.
              

                                                                                   Yours Faithfully,                          

                                                                                    By,

 

 

(Autographed)   ………………………  
All rights reserved.

Witness  1  ………………………………...                 Date: ………………….

 

Witness  2   ………………………………… 

 

 

 

New Post
 11/16/2011 12:50 AM
 

Lawful Notice To Respondent:

The human being calling himself David Cameron
also acting as the Prime Minister of the
United Kingdom Corporation

Westminster,

London, SW1A 2AA

England

 

8th November 2010

 

 

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

`

Notice to principal is notice to agent.

Notice to agent is notice to principal.

 

I, commonly addressed by the calling of Peter-Andrew: Nolan©, hereinafter the “Principal”, in my correct public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realized and free sentient man, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and not misleading, so help me God.

 

This Lawful Notice is addressed to the human being calling himself David Cameron also acting as the Prime Minister of the “United Kingdom Corporation” hereinafter the “Respondent”.

 

AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO
TRAVELING ON THE LAND KNOWN AS ENGLAND BY
THE MAN KNOWN AS Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

 

 

1.                  Principal is of legal age and competent to testify.

 

2.                  Principal has first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3.                  Principal makes oath that he wrote a Letter to Gordon Brown, Respondents predecessor, on or about 18/11/2009 and placed it into the Royal Mail on or about 19/11/2009. A copy of this letter is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.
















4.                  Principal makes oath that he received the following email reply on 07/01/2010 and sincerely believes this reply to have been sent by the human being calling himself Andrew Patterson claiming to re-present the “UK Border Agency”. A copy of this letter has been included in this package and countersigned to verify validity. The body of this letter is reproduced below.

Dear Mr Nolan,

Thank you for your correspondence dated 18th November 2009 to the Prime Minister, the Right Honourable Gordon Brown MP, which has been passed to me for response.

In paragraph two of your letter you state that believed that your human rights had been violated and cite Article 13 (2) of a Human Rights Decleration: “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country”. I can find no mention in your correspondence or United Kingdom Border Agency records that any attempt was made to prevent you leaving the United Kingdom.

In paragraph seven you state that your “Australian passport” violates your right to travel. This is a concern that you may wish to address with your own government.

You further state that on 15th November 2009 you arrived at Stansted airport. I am pleased to note that you felt the signage and the uniforms of the Border Agency officers were easily identifiable. I understand that you presented a valid Australian passport and a “World Passport” and sought leave to enter the United Kingdom.

The Border Agency officer examined you as provided for in paragraph 3 (1) a of the Immigration Act of 1971 as amended. I understand that he then endorsed your Australian passport and allowed you to proceed. The Border Agency officer correctly identified that the “World Passport” was not acceptable by the United Kingdom as satisfactory evidence of your nationality or identity. I am pleased that you felt your examination was conducted in a polite and professional manner.

My response to points one and two of paragraph fifteen of your letter reiterates my comment in the paragraph above in that the United Kingdom Border Agency do not recognise “World Service” passports as satisfactory evidence of the holders nationality nor identity.

I trust that this letter satisfactorily address your concerns.

Yours sincerely

Andrew Paterson

Immigration Officer

5.                  Principal makes oath that he wrote a Letter to the man calling himself Andrew Patterson on or about 01/03/2010 and placed it into the Royal Mail on or about 02/03/2010. A copy of this letter is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.

6.                  Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
Principal has a ‘Nationality’ or an ‘identity’ as these are attributes associated with the Trademark created from the ‘berth certificate’ and is not, in fact, the living breathing spirit of a man and sincerely believes none exists.








7.                  Principal makes oath that he completed a claim of right that included freedom of travel across the entire planet commonly known as the earth as well as the default judgement for that claim of right to the Queen of England and Wales and that your Queen failed to counter claim and therefore my right of freedom of travel across the entire planet known as earth is lawful and may no longer be rebutted. 

A copy of this document is enclosed in this envelope and countersigned to verify validity.

8.                  Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The legal entity calling itself “The United Kingdom” has any right to usurp agreements made by the woman calling herself “Queen Elizabeth II” and has also not seen any evidence that the legal entity calling itself “The United Kingdom” has any rights superior to the woman calling herself “Queen Elizabeth II” and sincerely believes none exists.

9.                  Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The legal entity calling itself “The United Kingdom” has any lawful right to interfere with Principals claimed and established right of travel across the entire planet commonly called the earth which has been accepted and agreed to by the woman calling herself “Queen Elizabeth II” by none response and sincerely believes none exists.

10.              Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The legal entity calling itself “The United Kingdom” does not have the legal status of a corporation and was not, in fact, incorporated as a company during World War II as an ‘emergency war measure’ that has never been rescinded and sincerely believes none exists.

11.              Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The legal entity calling itself “The United Kingdom” has any jurisdiction at all over Principal, the living breathing spirit of a man and sincerely believes none exists.

12.              Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The lands commonly called England and Wales are not common law lands and sincerely believes none exists.

13.              Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
The corporation known as “The United Kingdom” (that fraudulently calls legislation and statutes ‘law’) has any common law right to force it’s legislation and statutes onto human beings such as Principal and sincerely believes none exists.

14.              Principal makes oath that he has travelled to the land known as “England and Wales” extensively these last 10 years for business interactions as Principal has been based out of Ireland on an Irish Working Permit for 6 years and then an Irish 5 Year Residency Visa. You may verify this with Principals Trademark passport details. Principal is sure that the “The United Kingdom” has records of Principals trade marks ‘entries and exits’ from “The United Kingdom”.

15.              Principal makes oath that in the course of his business dealings on the land known as England he has made good friends and now proposes to travel to England and Wales on a regular basis for the pursuit of further business opportunities as well as for personal business in visiting friends.  

16.              Principal makes oath that in proposing to travel on the land known as England and Wales Principal will live in peace and harmony and live by the common law lawful standards of the local community.




17.              Principal makes oath that he will at no time call upon the resources of “The United Kingdom” and seeks no “free assistance” or “social welfare” from “The United Kingdom”.  Principal makes oath that he is willing to pay a fair and reasonable amount in the currency known as ‘British Pounds’ for any offered services of “The United Kingdom” that Principal might choose to contract for use.

18.              Principal makes oath that he is one of the world leaders in his area of expertise (Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing) and that he has substantial income generating capability from the software he has authored and the consulting services he can provide to his clients. Evidence of such can be viewed on www.peternolan.com and his former company site www.instantbi.com.

19.              As further evidence of Principals ability to provide for himself Principal makes oath ……..

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, the free man on the land commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan© standing in Gods Kingdom do hereby clearly, specifically and unequivocally claim my God given right to travel across the lands known as England and Wales.

Further, I claim that the corporation calling itself “The United Kingdom” has no right to interfere with my right of travel across the lands known as England and Wales.  

 

 

Further Principal saith not,

 

As Good As AVAL      _______________________________________________________ 
                                    Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of

                                    the Original Jurisdiction. Third party Intervener and aggrieved party.

 

Done this...................Day of the Eleventh Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno Domini, (8th November AD2010) near London, England.

 

 

JURAT:

ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of London, on this day personally appeared before me Peter-Andrew: Nolan© known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who executed the foregoing instrument acknowledged to me that Peter-Andrew: Nolan© executed the same as his free act and deed as true, correct complete and not misleading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KNOW all men that I, ______________________________ of  London, England, at the request of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Eighth Day of November 2010 Anno Domini, witness the above autograph of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© before

_____________________________________ and

_____________________________________.
               

                                                                                   Yours Faithfully,                          

                                                                                    By,

 

 

(Autographed)   ………………………  
All rights reserved.

Witness  1  ………………………………...                 Date: ………………….

 

Witness  2   ………………………………… 

 

 

 

Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Forums Parent ForumGeneral Forums Parent ForumOpen LettersOpen LettersOpen letter to the men of the World Citizen GroupOpen letter to the men of the World Citizen Group