| host |
 |
Joined: 12/4/2010
Posts: 4933
|
|
|
To
|
1A. Comments on the Election 1
Gentlemen and Ladies,
as has been explained to all members
of both houses. Cases have been
registered against all current
members of both houses in the new
MBA Law Services. The case registry
can be accessed by clicking
here.
Prior to the election all members
were issued with an open letter to
let them know that after the
election lawful notices would be
issued to all new members to warn
them of the criminal acts that they
are about to associate themselves
with.
Just for sake of ease on my part I
am issuing an Open Letter rather
than a Lawful Notice. I think it is
reasonable to hold Members of
Parliament, both houses, accountable
for their crimes without telling
them over again they are criminals.
Feel free to argue that point
publicly in your own name if you
think otherwise.
I do not currently have a list of
all the email addresses of all the
new members, so I will rely on the
willingness of existing members and
media to make sure all members of
both houses know about this Open
Letter.
|
1B.
Comments on the Election
All new members of parliament have
until December 31st to inform
themselves of the crimes with which
they are associating themselves.
They have until December 31st 2013
to resign from Parliament and leave
their positions.
Any member of either house who
entered Parliament by the recent
elections who leaved before December
31st 2013 because they do not wish
to associated themselves with the
crimes of their criminal colleagues
will be exempt from any prosecution
by MBA Law Services. We will
consider that you have done the
"honourable and honest" thing in
that when you were informed of the
crimes you were associating yourself
with you resigned and left.
Any newly elected member who returns
to office after January 1st and the
Christmas Holidays will be deemed to
have made the decision that he/she
wishes to associate him/herself with
the criminal activities of his/her
peers and will face prosecution by
MBA Law Services in the fullness of
time.
I believe in freedom of choice
ladies and gentlemen. You have the
choice whether to associate
yourselves with criminals and
thereby become a party to their
crimes. You will be held responsible
and accountable for your choice on
an "equal before the law" basis.
I recommend you choose wisely.
|
2A.
The Case of Darrell of the Family
Foote
The ongoing case of the unlawful
incarceration of Darrell of the
family Foote and the ongoing
suspected injections of substances
unknown, and the ongoing refusal of
the criminals holding him to allow
him communications with his
representative at law is hereby
declared a WAR CRIME.
Even inmates at Guantanamo Bay are
allowed phone calls. Should anyone
contest that it is a WAR CRIME to
hold someone in solitary
confinement, inject them with
substances unknown and allow them no
communications? Please feel free to
make your case in public in your own
name.
Here again are the links you can
click on to read the details of this
case.
I have issued notices to
Superintendent Blandford of the
Holden Hill Police Station
instructing him to investigate this
situation as my paid for servant to
determine for himself if Darrell has
been convicted of any crime by a
jury of his peers to warrant his
incarceration.
Superintendent Blandford is such an
arrogant scumbag criminal that he
seems to deem it un-necessary to
reply to his master and the people
who pay his salary when he is
instructed to investigate a criminal
act occurring on his watch in his
jurisdiction. The true colours of
our police officers is now being
shown in spades. They are scumbag
criminals who are there to defend
their political masters rather than
there to protect the people who are
paying their salaries.
Police officers will pay a very
heavy price for siding with you
criminals in politics. They will
receive no public pensions. They
will be removed from officer in a transitionary period. They will be
widely denounced as the scumbag
criminals they chose to be. They
will not be eligible for "welfare"
payments and nor will their
families. Perhaps they might have
thought better when I issued this
Lawful Notice 2.5 years ago.
It is now painfully obvious
that both sides of politics, both
the Rudd/Gillard government and now
the Abbott government are willing to
conduct ACTS OF WAR against men in
general and fathers in particular.
These ACTS OF WAR are
up to and including unlawful
incarceration, injection with
substances unknown, and solitary
confinement, universally accepted as
a form of torture. Because of these
ACTS OF WAR against Australian men
in general and fathers in particular it has become
necessary, on 11/11/2013, to claim
into existence MBA Armed Services.
You can read the claim into
existence of MBA Armed Services on
this link:
|
2B.
The Case of Darrell of the Family
Foote
Due to the nature of the WAR CRIME
that Tony Abbott, Kate Ellis,
Superintendent Blandford, Ken
O'Brian, and others have seen fit to
commit, effective immediately, I am
claiming into existence a limited
state of conflict on the land known
as Australia. That limited state of
conflict is a claim of a STATE OF
WAR with specific named enemy
combatants. These enemy combatants
are guilty of WAR CRIMES and are
resisting all efforts to have these
WAR CRIMES cease and desist and are
using taxpayer money to resist these
efforts.
Therefore, according to the long
traditions of WAR against those who
commit acts of aggression, including
the escalation established in WW II
in that it is lawful to target
civilians in acts of WAR, the
following people are named as enemy
combatants in this limited conflict.
- Tony Abbott (war criminal)
- Margie Abbott (wife)
- Louise Abbott (daughter)
- Bridget Abbott (daughter)
- Frances Abbott (daughter)
- Richard Henry Abbott (father)
- Fay Abbott (mother)
- Max Aitken (father in law)
- Gail Aitken (mother in law)
- Superintendent Blandford (war
criminal)
- Ken O'Brian (war criminal)
- Kate Ellis MP (war criminal)
- All serving officers at Holden
Hill Police Station (war
criminals)
- All serving staff at James
Nash House (war criminals)
- All contractors or suppliers
to James Nash House (aiding and
abetting war criminals)
- All brothers, sisters,
children, mothers, fathers, wives,
husbands and direct inlaws of all
of the above.
I want to be very clear about
this. Effective immediately any man
who takes up arms against these war
criminals and their direct family
members and commits an ACT OF WAR
will be given the honour and status
of a war hero on a par with our
brave ANZACS who distinguished
themselves in the service of their
people at places like Gallipoli,
Tobruk and the Kokoda Trail among
many other places.
I, and others, will honour such men
exactly as I honour Frank Trainor
and his comrades who died in South
East Asia defending Australia from
the foreign enemy of the day, the
Japanese.
Those named above are far more
treacherous than the Japanese ever
were in WW II because at least
Japanese soldiers had the honour,
honesty and integrity to make it
clear they were our mortal enemy of
the day.
Treasonous traitors like Kevin Rudd,
Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott do not
even have the honour, honesty or
integrity of the average Japanese
soldier in WW II. These three did
not declare that they are enemies of
the Australian people. Indeed, they
loudly proclaim the opposite so that
fools will think they are some kind
of "elected leader".
|
|
2C.
The Case of Darrell of the Family
Foote
Here is one fact many Australians
might not know about our friend Tony
Abbott and his "oh so innocent" wife
Margie. This is from Wikipedia which
may or may not be accurate.
"Margie
Aitken attended Fernlea School and
Wainuiomata College, where among
other studies she took part in a
pioneering Maori-language course. At
the age of 16, she entered teachers
college in Wellington, and after
graduation taught primary school in
Upper Hutt and Wainuiomata.
She taught Maori both there and
later in Australia. She later worked
at a recruitment firm, and in 1983
followed her boss to Sydney,
Australia when he sold the company.
Her next career move was to the
marketing department of Rothschild
Australia, a merchant bank in
Sydney.
In 1988 while at Rothschilds, she
met Tony Abbott at a Sydney pub. He
was then a journalist with The
Bulletin. He proposed after taking
her on the Kokoda Track. They
married at Riverview Chapel on 24
September 1988, and have since had
three daughters (Louise, Bridget and
Frances)."
So what is a Maori Language course
student who goes on to teach PRIMARY
SCHOOL doing winding up in the
marketing department of the
Rothchild Merchant Bank? Hmm? Just a
co-incidence?
Are we to believe that this woman,
while working at a Rothchild Bank
just so happens to co-incidentally
meet an up and coming reporter who
just so happens to go on to become
Prime Minister of Australia?
Gee, what are the odds, eh? No
conspiracy here. Just a freak
accident that a Maori language
primary school teacher gets a job at
a Rothchild Bank and winds up
married to the Prime Minister of
Australia. That could not have
possibly be something where some
undue influence was exerted, right?
Could have happened to ANY
maori-langauge primary school
teacher. Right?
I wonder how much influence the
Rothchilds exercise on Tony Abbott
since his wife was so miraculously
given a job there despite having
absolutely no reason to be an
employee of such an organisation.
I wonder if Tony Abbott was
"selected and groomed" as a possible
candidate as Bob Hawke was so
clearly "selected and groomed" as a
possible candidate via his Rhodes
Scholarship. I wonder how much the
Rothchilds have quietly assisted
Tony Abbot over the years and how
many "favours" Tony Abbott now owes
the Rothchilds.
I wonder what the REAL story is. For
those who know Margie Aitken? Maybe
you would like to ask her what her
connection with the Rothchilds
really is.
Plenty of the people receiving this
Open Letter will know Margie Aitken.
Feel free to ask her how she managed
to become an employee in a Rothchild
bank when it is well known that the
Rothchilds are at the very centre of
the criminal banking cartel. How did
that "accident" happen, eh?
Now. Back to the letter at hand.
It is the job of men to defend the
children of their land against all
enemies, foreign and domestic. And
these people listed above are the domestic
enemies of the children of
Australia.
These people listed above are willingly and knowingly
committing war crimes to assist the
implementation of a police state. An
introduction that has now become obvious with
the recent "bikie laws" which are
nothing more than the next slice of
introducing a police state.
As can be plainly seen by my efforts
to communicate with the likes of
Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland,
and subsequent PUBLIC SERVANTS since
December 2009 I have made all
efforts to settle the crimes against
me and others peacefully.
|
2D.
The Case of Darrell of the Family
Foote
In return these PUBLIC SERVANTS have
seen fit to further criminally
victimise me and hundreds of
thousands of other Australian men
and put up a "stone wall of silence"
to all correspondence no matter how
publicly that correspondence is
delivered.
That such correspondence was deleted
from the facebook of Kevin Rudd, his
twitter feeds, the facebook of the
ALP, the Facebook of Tony Abbott,
the facebook of the Liberal Party,
the facebook of Catherine Burn,
Deputy Commissioner of NSW Police,
the facebook of the NSW Police,
clearly and irrefutably demonstrates
that the criminals in government,
police and legal fraternity do not
intend to listen and talk.
Such actions clearly and irrefutably
demonstrates that the criminals in
government, police and legal
fraternity intend to continue to
commit crimes with no recourse to
law or path to justice to force the men of
Australia to defend themselves with
force. The plan is clearly to then
to attempt to slander such men and
criminalise them as "domestic
terrorists" via the totally "owned"
media.
That all these communications to
politicians have been made widely
available to the Australian media
and the Australian media have been
told to keep it quiet tells you just
how "owned" the media is by the
Rothchilds and co. The very people
who employed one Margie Aitken so
inexplicably all those years ago.
This is the clear and irrefutable
plan of action of the criminals in
politics, law and police. Now we all
know it.
No one can plausibly argue that
there have not been enough efforts
to present our PUBLIC SERVANTS with
their instructions to collaborate
and co-operate with us in the
re-introduction of the rule of law.
These NOW PUBLIC presentations to our PUBLIC
SERVANTS have been made over a
period of FOUR YEARS.
So now it will come to the possible
use of force and
violence. And, according to the
precedents established in WW II, men
defending their lands from enemies
foreign and domestic, have the
lawful right to target civilians and
the families of those who are
committing acts of WAR and WAR
CRIMES against them.
This claim of a limited state of
conflict will cease and desist when
Tony Abbott makes a public statement
releasing Darrell of the family
Foote and taking full and personal
responsibility for his unlawful
incarceration as the Prime Minister
of the foreign corporation known as
"The Commonwealth of Australia".
Once Darrell of the family Foote is
no longer being subjected to WAR
CRIMES we can put this situation
back on to a peaceful footing
whereby we will continue the process
of establishing the MBA Law Services Law Courts
in Australia to peacefully put all
the criminals in the two houses of
parliament on trial.
The family of Tony Abbott might like
to discuss with him whether they
like being publicly named ENEMY
COMBATANTS such that they can be
subject to ACTS OF WAR merely
because Tony Abbott wishes to commit
WAR CRIMES against Darrell of the
family Foote and the men of
Australia.
I will also note that should Darrell
of the family Foote be further
injured while unlawfully
incarcerated, or worse, should he be
killed or "suicided", this state of
limited conflict will remain in
force until all those responsible
are processed via the MBA Law
Services Law Courts.
This Open Letter is being made as
public as I can possibly make it. So
there is no excuse for those of you
who personally know the families of
these people who are now named ENEMY
COMBATANTS to contact them and warn
them of their position due to the
war crimes of their family members.
|
3A.
The Case of Suzanne Toal
As most of those reading this letter
know, my "awakening" to the
criminality of the government and
legal fraternity came about via the
crimes I suffered at the hands of my
ex wife, Jennifer Toal, the
criminals in the legal fraternity
like David Dunkley, Louise
Henderson, Justin Dowd, Registrar
Johnston and others.
It was very clear very early on in
my divorce that the legal fraternity
in Ireland were criminals. And it
did not take me too much longer to
find out that the legal fraternity
were criminals in Australia either.
That I was able to so easily lead
Justin Dowd of Watts McCray down the
garden path of denying common law
existed, and then saying that
statues were superior to common law,
while I had in my back pocket a
speech from Robert McClelland
clearly stating that individual
rights are protected by common law
in Australia was almost like sport.
Anyone who wants to see what a fool
Justin Dowd made of himself? Please
feel free to click this link.
On this link you will find Justin
Down assert over and over again that
the courts have the right to take my
property off me and he keeps
referring to statutes. And when I
presented him the speech by Robert
McClelland? Did Justin apologise for
his lies and return the money he
took from me for lying? No. He just
"shut up".
And when Justin refused to hand over
to me the supposed legislation of
the NSW Parliament making it legal
to use mandatory arrest and massive
violence with the element of
surprise by police? He actually
refunded me my AUD500 that he
charged me to "research" legislation
made to make 22,000 arrests in NSW
each year. The former President of
the NSW Law Society can not be much
of a lawyer if he has to charge
AUD500 to "research" legislation
used to make 22,000 arrests a year,
now can he?
And what sort of lawyer is he that
having "researched" this legislation
that affects every man in NSW he
refuses to hand it over to me when I
make it clear I am going to make it
public? Just what sort of criminal
scumbag lawyer refuses to hand over
alleged "legislation" and even
returned the "research" fee, eh?
So having trapped our friends in the
legal fraternity in their crimes and
later publishing their cases that
they have to answer for, I turned my
attention to Bill Toal and later
Michael Toal.
The obvious question I had was this:
"Since Bill
Toal and Michael Toal both know me
to be honest and know Jennifer to be
a criminal, why did they attack me
rather than holding their
daughter/sister accountable for her
crimes?"
Bill Toal and Michael Toal had no
idea that the accusation by Suzanne
Toal, my sister in law, their
daughter/sister, that Bill Toal
sexually molested her when she was
under 18 had reached my ears.
The only two people who knew that
accusation had reached my ears were
Jennifer and myself for the very
reason that it was Jennifer who
repeated the accusation to me.
|
3B.
The Case of Suzanne Toal
So I bided my time to "drop the
bombshell" on Bill Toal that his own
daughter had accused him of sexually
molesting her when she was under 18.
Such a "bombshell" is a pretty big
"bombshell" and I wanted to hold it
back until I perceived the time to
be right.
I eventually "dropped the bombshell"
on Bill Toal on November 1st last
year. Or, indeed, late on October
31st my time in Germany. The Lawful
Notice sent to the Wagga Wagga
Police is on this link:
It was very interesting to me
that the Wagga Wagga Police refused
to investigate a credible allegation
of child sexual abuse. So after a
while I put the accusation directly
on the facebook of Catherine Burn.
Of course Catherine in the Deputy
Commission of NSW Police and an
ardent feminist. A credible
accusation of female child sexual
abuse should be something she would
be interested in, right?
Even if she will not investigate the
fact that there seems to be no
available copy of the legislation
authorising her officers to perform
mandatory arrests using massive
force and the element of surprise.
Even if she will not investigate
video evidence of David Dunkley
commit the crime of impersonating a
public officer in front of two on
duty federal police officers who run
away like cockroaches who have a
torch shined on them.
She WILL investigate a credible
accusation of female child sexual
abuse, right? I mean THAT would
really be bad for her "feminist
credentials" if she did not, right?
But no. Catherine Burn is willing to
publicly refuse to investigate a
credible accusation of female child
sexual abuse. How interesting, eh?
If anyone doubts that she received
this accusation directly on her
facebook? Please feel free to click
on the link below:
I mean, it is well established
that Catherine Burn is a man hater
of EPIC proportions. That she does
not make sure her officers who make
22,000 "mandatory arrests" for
alleged domestic violence each year
without being able to present the
proper paperwork for doing so? Not a
problem for a man hater like
Catherine Burn.
That men have their children stolen
by her officers? That her officers
throw men out of their houses? That
her officers throw men in jail
unlawfully? That her officers
destroy men's businesses? Not a
problem for a man hater like
Catherine Burn.
But that she passes up the chance to
destroy a mans life with a credible
allegation of child sexual abuse
from non other than the mans
daughter? And corroborated as an
accusation by another of the mans
daughters? And that she used the
incredibly lame excuse that the
accusation even being posted to her
facebook might "compromise" the
process at the very same time Rolf
Harris was being pilloried in the
press?
|
|
3C.
The Case of Suzanne Toal
What was REALLY her reason for
refusing to investigate a credible
allegation of child sexual abuse by
Suzanner Toal?
That was a question worth asking and
digging around a bit to see what was
really going on.
And now I think I have the answer.
It has taken a while. But this is
what I think is happening with this
credible accusation of child sexual
abuse by Suzanne Toal against Bill
Toal.
It is well known now that Michael
Toal, my ex brother in law, was a
bought and paid for ASIO agent for
many years. We have all the evidence
we need of that. The very fact that
ASIO assets have been used to
slander me for THREE YEARS would
indicate that Michael has used up
many favours with his old ASIO mates
to conduct these slander sites.
Roping in complete morons like Chris
Merrett and Chris Roubis to also
participate in these slander sites I
guess is how ASIO works. Or maybe
ASIO is just paying these morons to
make their false allegations.
But there can be no doubt that
Michael Toal has used his ASIO
contacts to slander me and to find
out the identity of other men and to
threaten them.
And there can be no doubt that Bill
Toal knew me well enough to know
that no matter how long it took I
would bring Jennifer to justice and
ensure she makes remedy for her
crimes.
So what, I ask you, could motivate
both Michael Toal and Bill Toal to
commit crimes themselves, to aid and
abet Jennifer when they know she is
a criminal, and to openly and
publicly allow ASIO to slander me
for YEARS.
And the answer to all these
questions drops out very quickly and
very easily once ALL the pieces are
laid out. What do you think of THIS
explanation?
I suggest that BOTH Bill Toal and
Michael Toal sexually molested
Suzanne Toal. I suggest that they
BOTH so much as raped her or
committed some other serious sexual
assault when Suzanne was a teen
girl.
Suzanne goes to Jennifer to ask for
her advice and Jennifer asks my
advice. However, due to this sexual
abuse Suzanne is now on drugs and is
living a very "car crash" lifestyle.
So no one is going to believe her
story. This would very much explain
her turning to drugs and living a
"car crash" lifestyle while none of
the other children did so.
Many women who are sexually abused
by their fathers of brothers as
children "run off the rails" as it
were.
So Jennifer? When she comes to
committing crimes against me and
wants the support of her father and
her brother in continuing to benefit
from the crimes she committed
against men? What better card would
she have to play than
"I know you
raped Suzanne when she was young. If
you do not help me with Peter I will
tell the world you raped Suzanne."
How about THAT for motivation for
Bill Toal and Michael Toal to assist
Jennifer in her crimes against me?
Blackmail from Jennifer to expose
them as rapists of their
daughter/sister.
And who could get Catherine Burn to
bury any question or any
investigation of a credible
allegation of female child sexual
abuse that will destroy her own
personal "feminist credentials"?
Well the only answer to that is
someone who can threaten her with
firing her or threaten her pension
plan. And that means ASIO. And who
do we know is connected to ASIO?
Michael Toal.
So one of the few people who could
use his ASIO connections to bury the
investigations of him raping his
little sister and to bury
investigations of his father raping
his little sister is Michael Toal.
It all fitted together so perfectly.
The question was to get some other
evidence to go with this allegation.
And this evidence has taken a little
while to surface by it was
inevitable that it would.
Once I went public with Suzanne
Toals accusation that she was
sexually abused as an under 18 by
Bill Toal it was only a matter of
time before someone else Suzanne
Toal had talked to contacted me and
confirmed that Suzanne Toal had also
told her about her child sexual
abuse at the hands of her father.
|
3D.
The Case of Suzanne Toal
It was not at all likely that
Suzanne Toal had only ever told
Jennifer of this allegation. Women
love to talk about being victims.
Suzanne Toal will have told numerous
people about her child sexual abuse.
And now I expect those people are
going to come forward.
So there you have it. That Jennifer
decided to criminally victimise me
and then blackmail her father and
brother in to supporting her crimes
in their attempt to hide the fact(?)
that they BOTH raped Suzanne when
she was still a teen girl?
What a very plausible turn of events
this would turn out to be. And the
person who gave it away? How
appropriate that it would be the man
hater Catherine Burn by her lame
excuse "such allegations made public
might compromise the process" when
men are pilloried in the newspapers
on daily basis in front of millions.
That Catherine used such an obvious
and lame excuse really got me
interested in this story. Until she
did that I was still very much
thinking that the allegation from
Suzanne Toal was very likely false.
If Catherine had a brain, which she
seems not to, she would have
instructed two trusted criminal
police officers to perform the
necessary interviews of Bill Toal,
Michael Toal, Jennifer Toal, Suzanne
Toal, Crissy Toal and Kerry Toal and
conclude that "there is now no
accusation of child sexual abuse by
any of the 4 daughters" on the
report. They would have published
the report and put the matter to bed
with lies. How easy would it have
been to do that? Criminal Police
falsify reports every day in
Australia.
But no. Rather than pretend to
investigate in order to find "no
evidence" there was not even a
pretence of an investigation.
Catherine just gave a lame excuse
for deleting the evidence from
public view like that would work and
not raise suspicions.
Well? Now further evidence has come
forth? I wonder what Catherine Burn
is going to say now that her
"feminist credentials" are in such
tatters? I wonder how all those
other women on "Emilys List" are
going to treat Catherine Burn now
they know that she passed up a
chance to destroy a mans life,
perhaps two mens lives, with a
credible allegation of female child
sexual abuse?
If Alex Baldwin is any anything to
go by? I rather think that the other
women on Emilys List are going to
turn on Catherine Burn and "eat
their own".
I also rather think that the other
women on Emilys list and their male
lackeys are going to want to start
digging around the Suzanne Toal case
to see if they can find the same
evidence that has turned up for me.
After all? What bunch of man hating
feminists can resist destroying a
mans life finding out if he raped
his daughter or his sister? Man
hating feminists destroy mens lives
supporting the current divorce
system just for the sport of it. To
get to dig up dirt like raping your
teen daughter or teen sister? That's
the sort of stuff man hating
feminist dreams are made of.
Once again. Contact details for
these two who now stand accused
publicly of sexually molesting,
perhaps even raping their
daughter/sister Suzanne Toal are
below. We shall get to the bottom of
exactly why Bill Toal and Michael
decided to commit crimes against me
when they knew quite well that I
would not tolerate them.
Bill Toal
23 Fernleigh Rd
Turvey Park
Wagga Wagga
NSW 2650
02 69 25 40 41
Michael Toal
20 Bruce Ave
Killara
NSW 2071
Phone 0412 327 054
I am sure all the shrieking
harridans on Emilys list are going
to want to start their own
investigations around Bill Toal and
Michael Toal to see if they can turn
up the same evidence I have been
able to collect in recent months.
If they can't? I am sure some of
their number will just make up lies.
After all? For feminists? When they
can't find facts or evidence lies
will do, right? Perjury is ok for
women, right? Just ask Jennifer!
Bill Toal and Michael Toal supported
Jennifer's perjury. They can't
complain if some Emily list woman
commits perjury against them just to
nail their hides to the wall.
|
4A.
Your Peers in The Irish Guvmint
One last point I would like to make
you politicians, and, of course,
your constituent aware of. You might
like to click on
this link where you can read,
and please allow me to quote.
"About
40,000 Irish people moved to
Australia in 2011 and 2012, with
5,000 settling permanently. The
Minister said the situation was a
gain for Australia but a drain on
Ireland. He said he looked forward
to emigrants returning as the
economy improved."
Those 40,000 Irish people who are in
Australia at your behest and your
agreement taking jobs away from
Australians and depressing salaries
some more? While in return your
peers in the Irish guvmint have seen
fit to attempt to persecute me by
not allowing me a residency permit
or work permit?
Really? This is the sort of
"balance" you politicians think you
should achieve eh? Well I have an
idea. Since the Irish guvmint is so
keen to refuse to give me a work
permit how about those long
suffering Australian taxpayers who
have hired Irish workers over the
last few years
FIRE AN IRISH PERSON TODAY!
That makes a good slogan, eh?
FIRE AN
IRISH PERSON TODAY!
Irish people do not
welcome people even of Irish
descent.
Irish people do not care when
Australians are victimised by the
Irish Courts.
Irish people are flooding in to
Australia and stealing jobs and
stealing welfare and stealing
property.
FIRE AN
IRISH PERSON TODAY!
And keep firing them until they
learn to treat Australians in
Ireland fairly and justly. And I
will be emailing this idea to the
Irish Ambassador and the Irish
Parliament as well as spreading it
around as many groups as a I can in
Australia.
FIRE AN
IRISH PERSON TODAY!
Fire them until they get THEIR
politicians to provide citizenship
and visas like WE have provided
citizenship and visas!!!
FIRE AN
IRISH PERSON TODAY!
It has a certain ring to it, doesn't
it?!
|
4B.
Your Peers in The Irish Guvmint
I would also point you all to
this article. Published on
August 30th 2013 I quote:
"Ireland's
rate of emigration is continuing to
increase and at one stage one person
was leaving the country to live
abroad every six minutes - the
highest number since modern records
began in the late 1980s.
New figures published on Thursday
show 397,500 people have emigrated
since Ireland's financial crisis
began in 2008, with most travelling
to the UK, Australia and Canada in
search of work.
During the same period 277,400
people have returned or moved to
Ireland, giving a net outward
migration figure of 120,100. In a
12-month period from April last
year, 10 people left every hour."
"Almost a third of 15 to
24-year-olds, who grew up during an
era when highly paid jobs were
plentiful, are now out of work and
even those with jobs have seen their
wages slashed.
More than a third of people leaving
the country in the 12-month period
to the end of April were between 15
and 24 years of age. Some 50,900 of
the 89,000 people who emigrated were
Irish citizens while the rest were
nationals from other countries."
Your peers in Ireland have
consciously and deliberately
damaged, some would save
irrecoverably destroyed, the Irish
economy. And while your peers
persecute one man wanting to have a
work permit so no other gumints will
attack his clients? You give jobs
and welfare to these Irish
Immigrants while allowing young
Australian people to lose their jobs
and for tax payers to pay welfare
for these Irish people.
After all this? I think I have
changed my mind. I think I will
collect the welfare payments from
the Australian guvmint that I am
entitled to as part of recovering
the taxes I paid on the basis of
fraud in Australia.
After all? If the Irish guvmint has
destroyed their own economy and
shipped 40,000 Irish people to
Australia to take Australian jobs
and to take taxpayer welfare while
denying me a work permit? Then it is
only reasonable that I am given part
of my tax money back in welfare
while your criminal peers persecute
me, right?
I will find out who the relevant
minister is and send along my Lawful
Notice. I expect you will all
be in agreement, right?
|
|
5.
CAF Alexa Rankings
One last point. The CAF Alexa
Rankings have shot through the roof.
Right now CAF ranks at 570,000
worldwide in web sites. This means
that the page rank is high and names
that go into CAF come up very high
on search results.
The search results for your names on
your CAF Case Registry entries is
coming up high on the results list.
As more and more people search CAF
and find your names on your case
registry entries word will get
around that you have all been
accused of crimes and have cases to
answer for.
|
6.
All comments welcome
Thanks for reading.
Best regards
Your brother peter/joschua
Founder
Mens/Womens Business Associations
Re-introducing the rule of Law to
Australia and Ireland
despite the opposition of our
politicians.
MBA
WBA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|