You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Welcome to the Crimes Against Fathers Forums

Minimize
 
ForumForumNews from Freed...News from Freed...News Parent ForumNews Parent ForumNews From Rober...News From Rober...02 May 2011 16:55 The Hauge Convention on Children02 May 2011 16:55 The Hauge Convention on Children
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 5/18/2011 8:14 PM
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kennedy [mailto:lfant@terrorbyte.com.au]
Sent: 02 May 2011 16:55
To: 
Subject: The Hauge Convention on Children


Hi to all


Help fix fathers and children being denied by Public Servants what The Hague Convention on Children and our Commonwealth Government have already and long ago decreed is ours to use..


Australia is a signatory to the Hague Convention on Children viz children’s rights.  Of most concern to us of this mailing are

  • The definition of what is a ‘child’s home’ is ‘where it normally lives
  • Parental Child abduction - not espoused in our States and Territories legislation
  • Parental alienation.


All are components of the Rights of Children Australia has signed to but it Family Court and States and territories governments are withholding to the peril of many children.


A Child’s Home

Is defined by the Hague Convention as ‘where a child normally lives’ and note not with ‘whom they live’. Covers the ‘criminal’ gap in states and territories legislation that states and territories police do have a responsibility under the Hague Convention upon complaint to return an ‘abducted’ child’ in non criminal but ‘parental’ circumstances to where it normally lives.  Usually in combination with the second degree of ‘parental child abduction’.


Parental Child Abduction

By the Hague Convention covers States and Territories criminal code act not naming parental child abductors.  Covers situations of oft described “Doing a runner with the kids” where States and Territories Police can ‘in the best interests of the children’ act promptly and remedially.  Independently in the child’s interest irrespective of any other such as family court proceeding are ‘on foot’ and until those proceedings and their {slow} progress might eventually deem the same or otherwise.


The intention is to ‘immediately’ spare children from abduction stress and being deprived of their ‘normalcy’ while other proceedings are ‘on foot’ or are begun.


A less satisfactory alternative is application to the family court for “Recovery Orders” for the ‘abducting parent’ to return the child.  The process is slow and costly and the parent may defy returning the child requiring further delay and costs and court proceedings and the Federal Police.  The family court has a recorded bias not to make orders against the most offender mothers but immediate against an abducting father.  Even the family court contrary to Australians signing the international agreement is prepared to deny the children their Hague Convention ‘parental child abduction’ protection when the abductor is the mother.  Note is also contrary to the other Hague Convention recognition of “Parental Alienation also ignored by the family court  This the States and Territories Police more immediate ‘protection’ of parentally abducted children is more preferable.


Parental Alienation Syndrome

While this is recognized fairly universally internationally and by the Hague Convention on Children, the Family Court of Australia refuses to recognize it in any form including Australia being a signatory to the Hague Convention on Children.  Aligns with well recorded family court bias not to apply the law equally to offending mothers.


None of the above needs to be ‘legislated’ because the Commonwealth Government has signed to undertake and deliver it nationally.  It just needs everyone on this list to lobby politicians and court and police and any other citizens to lobby that We citizens be delivered what The Commonwealth has undertaken internationally on our behalf.


Again everyone the success is up to everyone of you doing your bit to ‘demand’ The Public Service delivers what The Government decreed us.  As simple as that.

As simple as you children asking “Daddy can I have?’ as they do on these same questions and if you do nothing you are saying no to your own and all others children. 


Blokes have to stop being so selfish that if it does not directly happen to them then they do nothing - thus vote against fathers and for feminist.


Phone me I you need help.                         Regards Robert


Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumNews from Freed...News from Freed...News Parent ForumNews Parent ForumNews From Rober...News From Rober...02 May 2011 16:55 The Hauge Convention on Children02 May 2011 16:55 The Hauge Convention on Children