You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login

Welcome to the Crimes Against Fathers Forums

ForumForumNew South WalesNew South WalesNew South Wales Parent ForumNew South Wales Parent ForumName and Shame ...Name and Shame ...Sam Brett Criminal Aiding and abetting genocide and other crimes by criminalsSam Brett Criminal Aiding and abetting genocide and other crimes by criminals
Previous Previous
Next Next
New Post
 5/8/2012 1:31 PM
Samantha Brett, the deeply evil woman who pretends to be an expert on "relationships" on the SMH blogs.

I first went to the SMH in June 2008 to start a public debate on the issues of the criminality of the family courts and the women who were invoking those family courts.

Here are some of the email  trail to Samantha Brett. Make up your own mind as to her criminality. But this woman will be standing trial soon enough.

New Post
 5/8/2012 1:38 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 6:39:17 PM

Notice the date.....22 July 2008 14:54

This is how long Sam Brett has been suppressing information presented to her. Do not forget Sam deBritto is also on the email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 22 July 2008 14:54
To: ''
Cc: ''
Subject: It is a shame about the censorship

(To Sam de Brito. I’m not hot buddy….sorry….but I wanted to copy you in on a very important email to Sam Brett. I’ll drop you a separate one later…Peter.) 

Hi Sam,

Time to introduce myself to you personally. As you will know from my email address my name is Peter Nolan and my web address is I am very much a ‘real’ person and am clearly not trying to ‘hide’ in any way. Anything I say in public I am prepared to put my name to…unlike many other of your blog participants it would seem. 

I am sure you have been somewhat intrigued by my presence on your blog. 

Firstly, I want to say I am grateful that you (or your moderator) have allowed many of my posts to stand up until now. I hoped that using my real email address would convey to you that I am serious. 

The Family, Rape and DV laws of NSW are seriously biased against men and men don’t even know it. The mainstream media and government are in on the deal and so there really is only the internet to get the message out. I am kind of surprised you have not been told to stop my comments about biased laws before now. It comes as no surprise you are censoring me now and certainly, no offence is taken. I expected it. In fact, I was counting on it. I wanted you, and others, to see that the ‘response’ to someone posting about biased laws is censorship. That is, the removal of the right of free speech, especially when that free speech is accurate. 

It is what ALL totalitarian governments do when they do not like what is being said….response #1 is censorship. And now you have seen it for yourself. 

So, you see, I wanted censorship to happen as evidence that if a man says the laws are biased in NSW through a public medium the government will censor that comment. Oh, I am sure the person who told you to censor me was not ‘from the government’ and gave you some reasons like ‘he is upsetting the women on the blog’, but you can be in no doubt that the string leads back to the NSW governments. No-one wants men to know that they are being heavily discriminated against, especially the government. 

My own personal opinion is that it is a shame that you (or the moderator) will allow posts like these… 

“Posted by: Belinda on July 17, 2008 8:29 PM”

The type of women that men won't commit to are:
Honest, attractive, STD disease free, hard working, law abiding, decent, humanitarian, sexy, kind, generous women.

The type of women that men of today's pig culture commit to are: sl*ts, hookers, porno woemn, drug users, and any other trait that is evil.

Men do not want decent women, they want women who are dirty aids filled whores!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Never take my word for it, take a look around western society!

Men do not want decent women anymore, only the dirty whore types.


“Posted by: Megan Jones Smith on July 17, 2008 8:46 PM”

Men only want hookers, and stippers and sluts! Might as well charge a man for it since you never going to get any thing but a root out of a man today. MEN ARE NOT INTO COMMITMENT! ONLY ROOTING AROUND.

Men are the sh*t of the earth.
I hope that all men die! The earth would be a much better place without them.

No matter how decent you are, even if you have no make up and are wearing old clothes, men STILL come up to me as if I am hooker of the year! I hate men! hope they all get aids and die slow agonizing deaths!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Men are the sh*t of the earth.
Men are preditory sh*t that need to be exterminated!



But not a post like this: 

"Posted by: tara on July 21, 2008 9:21 PM" 

"Women are different, we have inborn needs and feelings different to men.....

because of the feminist lies that have been fed to us about women being able to 'have it all' and live 'like a man'.....but its often impossible in today's sh*t culture." 

Tara, I just re-read your post. You are clearly a remarkably intelligent and insightful woman. Would that there were more like you. I certainly hope your female colleagues listen to you when you say things like this. 

You have hit the nail on the head right here. The genders are indeed...different. We have different needs, desires, strengths and capabilities. 

Feminists were sold the unachievable goal of 'gender equality' because it is 'standard procedure' in Marxist Doctrine for generating a 'class struggle'. The goal has to be unachievable to keep the 'struggle' going. 

Striving for 'Gender Equality' between the sexes makes about as much sense as striving for 'fruit equality' between bananas and oranges. A noble pursuit, but oranges and bananas are different. So are men and women. Sure, men and women can be treated as 'equal' under the law (though they are not) but men and women will remain inherently different in a million different ways for generations to come. And that, in my opinion, is a GOOD thing. 

Women trying to 'have it all' and 'live life like a man'? Most women have NO IDEA idea how men lived these last 500  years. NONE AT ALL. In 1900 about 1% of all work men did was 'office work'. The rest was generally pretty hard labour. The 'great jobs' that feminsts tell women they were 'oppressed by not having' didn't exist. For the most part men lived, and still do live, pretty tough lives. Go to a steelworks. Go down a coal mine. Go to an oil rig. Go to Iraq and look at the brave young men in uniform. Women only see 'the glamorous bit' of men's jobs. They do not see all the crap men put up with. Wars for example. Do women really want that part of 'living like a man'? Fighting and dying for their country? I don't think so. 

You are astute in your comment on our culture. Our culture today includes a very planned and deliberate 'war between the sexes' and it is pervasive. Women have been fooled into making men 'adversaries' and they are fast making men into 'enemies'. Dating and developing relationships is 'all but impossible' because the cultural force at work is 'adversarial' and not 'co-operative' as it was when I was young. Most of my friends remain married. 

In an 'adversarial' situation men will always win. Men do 'adversary' and 'enemy' way better than women. Remember, men started, fought and ended all wars. Should women continue to swallow these lies and make 'enemies' of men there will eventually be a real battle and women will lose. Men kill or enslave their 'enemies' no matter they are men, women or children. Men have done this all through the ages. They will do it again if provoked enough. 

It is my hope that enough women (5% or so) will wake up to the lies and deceipt of the men who started and still promote feminism today and that they will vote for fair laws so that the destructive force of feminsm can be defused in our society without more serious consequences. With fair laws, and the lies of feminsm exposed, it is my hope that the 'war of the sexes' can be rolled back over the next 60 years. It's a project worthy of my time. Which is why I am here. 

Tara. Thank you for your contribution in your post. I think it is the single most valuable post by a woman I have read here. 

Be that as is may Sam,

There is something else I would like you to think about, if you will? 

This is very important to the society in which you live. Indeed, you now have the second biggest story in the world in your in tray. Well done! I wonder, will you do anything with it? 

You run a relatively small blog..but you run it in a prestigious newspaper….and there are real reporters floating around the building you are working in. It is why I selected you and your blog as my ‘starting point’. 

If the two comments above are not ‘evidence enough’, you have seen with your own eyes the level of vicious and abusive comment made by women against men on your blog. The question not being asked in our society is “Why?” Why is there so much hatred by women against men? It didn’t exist 40 years ago…or even 30 years ago in my hometown in Wagga. Yet today misandry is pervasive in our society, even on your blog. It is everywhere you look. 

Why? How did it happen? 

Well, the ‘bombshell’ is this. 

The Soviet Union did it. 

Let me explain. 

In the 50s, during the height of the height of the cold war it would seem someone in the Soviet Union hatched a plan to weaken the west by starting a ‘class struggle’ between men and women. If you want good references, just look at the links below. Herbert Marcuse is ‘the smoking gun’. He is a direct link from the Frankfurt School to the New Left in California. The evidence is very, very strong that the Soviet Union kicked off feminism. Very strong indeed. 

Personally, I think Kruschev was bragging in the famous kitchen debate with Nixon in 1959 when he said “We will destroy you from within.”  I think Kruschev already knew about the plan and couldn’t help himself threatening Nixon like that. He was a very brutal and determined man. You may not know he led the defence of Stalingrad at the special appointment of Stalin. Kruschev is one of the most brutal and determined men who ever led a major power, and destruction of the west was on his mind in the 50s and 60s. 

And Sam. Don’t forget. In Australia the family law was overhauled by the Whitlam Government in 1975. The labor party was in the ‘wilderness’ for years and years and only spent 3 years in office. Despite all the things they COULD have worked on that would have improved life in Australia they chose to work on the re-writing of family law (much of it being imported from California by the way directly linking the Whitlam Government to Herbert Marcuse) as one of their highest priorities

Why? There was no outcry over the difficulty of divorce at the time. It was not an ‘election issue’. Go read the newspapers of the time. They will be available to you. 

Here is a question for you. Who do you think put rewriting Family Law in such as way as was known to be highly destructive of any society at the top of the ‘todo’ list of the Whitlam Government? I don’t know, but I would bet my house (of which I own almost nothing post divorce) it was communist elements inside the party masquerading as ‘family friendly’ and ‘women friendly’. 

Sam, empowering women and no fault divorce was invented by the Bolshevicks with the express purpose of destroying the family structure so that the Bolshevicks could ‘educate/indoctrinate’ the children. It was to cut the transmitter of the culture that was the family. There is truth in “the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.” The Bolshevicks knew that to create their ‘communist utopia’ they needed to cut the cultural transmitter of father/mother to the child. That was the purpose for which no fault divorce was invented. 

The other transmitter of culture was the church so the Bolshevicks simply shot all the ministers and closed all the churches. But they could not do that with men. So they got the women do divorce them, and then they took the children off the women. The men didn’t care any more and let the women lose the children. Does the number 13,000 mean anything to you? That’s the number of children removed from the ‘family’ home last year in NSW ostensibly for ‘domestic violence’ and ‘abuse’ concerns. The children are being stolen and ‘indoctrinated’….not good if you ask me. 

What happened in the Soviet Union was that the society collapsed. Even the soviets were not able to provide enough support to raise and indoctrinate all the children they stole from their families. The west has come up with an ingenious plan to get around this problem. They passed laws to force the men to pay for the indoctrination of their own children. How about that! Men are paying to be discriminated against, paying for wives who don’t want them and then paying for the indoctrination services provided by the state…men are the new ‘drones’ of our society…but it is not going to end there. Women are next….And men have a ‘get out of jail card’, women do not. 

By 1940 even the Soviet Union had figured out no fault divorce and empowering women was a really bad idea. And with war on the horizon these laws were repealed and the soviets started working on the idea of family being important again. Sam, think about that…in 23 years even the Bolshevicks figured out no fault divorce was a bad idea. And we have had it 33 years now in Australia and the communist programmed feminists are still screaming for more and more power to be given to women and children. And the misandry that is spread with that screaming is destroying the ability for men and women to relate to each other properly. And Sam, despite what all your shrill women readers might scream at me through your blog, I am actually a very knowledgeable and expert person on the topic of relationships. I just turns out that western women are not able to sustain their relationships while also hating the person they want that relationship with. Women today will only sustain a relationship if they are getting ‘everything and more’ given to them to ‘make them happy’. You know this to be true as well as I do. It gets written on your blog by women every day. As far as women are concerned today, it is the mans job to ‘make them happy’. And that is an endless and thankless job. Men are starting to realise this. 

Sam. Our society is very ill….you can see it for yourself. 

The rising crime rates, rising drug abuse, rising violence, rising single parenthood. Women are abusing men like it is going out of fashion. So far, men have been restrained, but go talk to Sam dB. He will tell you that a fair slice of men have ‘had enough’ and that if they decide to push back, the push will be a lot harder than women might like. 

I, for one, would like to make my small contribution to correcting this problem. Perhaps you do too, perhaps you don’t. Perhaps some other reporter there wants to contribute to HIS society? Who knows?

Personally, I will not live in Australia again. I live in Germany now where they know what a totalitarian state looks like and they won’t allow it. They know what Nazis look like so they don’t allow women to be ‘femnazis’. It is just as illegal for a woman to hit a man here or abuse a man here as it is for a man to do likewise. The family law is the fairest in the western world and men are still refusing to marry in their millions. The replacement rate is running at 1.1 in Germany. A woman finding a man to marry her in Germany is facing an almost impossible task. Men are marrying Eastern, South American, and Oriental women in very large percentages over German women. It will soon be the same in Australia. As ever, the Germans are way ahead of the curve on social issues. 

So Sam, what can be done? 

Step 1. Awareness.

Men do NOT know they are discriminated against heavily in NSW. I posted the very law on your blog today that specifically references such discrimination. ‘Someone’ needs to make it known that men are discriminated against. The media and the government will make every effort to stop whoever tries. Blogs such as yours and Sam dBs are one way of getting attention, but a reporting from the SMH who chases down this second biggest story in the world today? He might have an opportunity at ‘making his name’ blowing the lid off this……as Bernstein did with Nixon. 

Step 2. Get the laws changed.

I have a plan to work on getting the laws changed in NSW once men are aware of the legalised discrimination against them. Will you join in? 

Getting laws back to ‘equal’ is the only way that men and women are going to possibly be able to have sustainable relationships in the future. Biased laws kill relationships because the parties are no-where near equal. When men had more rights they generally used them very fairly in support of the overall society. (Remember, our society has been very successful these last 2,000 years). Now that women have more rights they are abusing that power and abusing men and men are simply dis-engaging. The soviet plan to weaken western society is working well. 

If the laws are not changed back to ‘equal’ then men will, sooner or later, take back control of society on the basis that women are damaging it and that the overall society is much more important than women’s rights. When that civil unrest happens, the federal and state governments will make an effort to take over the country and convert it to an even more totalitarian state. Women will suffer badly if that happens as men will not fight to defend and protect them. 

While this process of awareness and changes to the law is going on, the only defence men have is to refuse to participate.  Ghandi changed the laws in India by non-violent non-participation. Men will do the same. Every man who can be ‘woken up’ to the fact the laws are biased can simply refuse to co-habit….in 10 or 20 years women will wake up and insist the laws are made fair. It will be the only chance to get men to marry again….though, truth be known, many will probably refuse once they have had a taste of ‘real freedom’. 

Sam, you know something. Despite what the communist programmed feminists claim, Marriage was never invented to oppress women. Men invented marriage, adultery laws and prostitution laws to OPPRESS MEN into marrying and supporting the woman and children with his very life and men sold it to men as ‘noble’ and ‘honourable’ on the back of the ‘love’ story. Without that level of oppression, men would have refused to marry because it has always been a bad deal for men…always. But old men knew that ‘more babies’ was strategically important to the society so a way HAD to be found to oppress men into being the life long providers for women who could not physically perform the work necessary to provide for herself and her children. 

Remember, we are talking an agricultural society, and women simply did not have the strength it took to do the vast majority of the work required in those societies. For example, ploughing a field using a horse. How many women can do that as a percentage compared to men? 

So, Sam, women don’t get it, most men DON’T want kids…they have to be ‘sold’ the idea of children. Women want children, not men. 

A woman friend of mine hit the nail on the head the other day…we were talking about babies and I asked her if she wanted babies….she is Russian so no feminism and no misandry..….she said “Peter. Babies are the purpose of a woman’s existence. It is what we are here for. An old woman without children is a sad woman.” And that is about as true a statement as I have ever heard. She is 34 and desperately looking for a husband because she wants three children. Her first husband (German) ‘left’. 

Now women have ‘upset the apple cart’ it may be impossible to ever convince men to marry in the future. Men have realised that being single with no kids is a WAY better life for a man and there is no stigma attached to being so any more. 

So, Sam, getting to the end….the laws are unfair. Misandry is pervasive and now ‘accepted’ even in the legislation of NSW. 

Are you going to do anything to improve the society in which you live? Do you know any reporter there who might be interested in following up on this story? Can you pass along this email to him if you do? 

In Australia we won’t be seeing married people living happily together for their whole lives like my mum and dad again in my lifetime. However, if people like me get the ball rolling there is a chance that this mess might be cleaned up inside of 50-60 years. 

Are you up for contributing to your society? Are you selfless enough to do that? 

Will you join me and the many other men around trying to make these biased laws equal? 

Best Regards 

Peter Nolan


These are some of the links pointing to the Soviet and communist influence on the launch of feminism. It has always been known that feminism was based on Marxism. I do not think it has been well known the soviets contributed. Also. One of the real dangers of feminism is  that the super rich (eg Rockerfellers) and the governments also support it as it makes more money (women in work) and provides more power and control (via draconian Family Law System) to the state.

And if you go to here you can read about Marcuse and you can see he was directly tied to C Write Mills who, wait for it, was a co-founder of the New Left movement which is EXACLTY where feminism got it’s first early followers in the hippies and the colleges…… that is about as direct as you get. A Marxist from the Frankfurt School tied directly to the New Left…. 

In 1952 he began a teaching career as a political theorist, first at Columbia University and Harvard University, then at Brandeis University from 1958 to 1965, where he taught philosophy and politics, and finally (by then he was past the usual retirement age), at the University of California, San Diego. He was a friend and collaborator of the historical sociologist Barrington Moore, Jr. and of the political philosopher Robert Paul Wolff, and also a friend of the Columbia University sociology professor C. Wright Mills, one of the founders of the New Left movement. 

The New Left were the left-wing movements in different countries in the 1960s and 1970s that, unlike the earlier leftist focus on union activism, instead adopted a broader definition of political activism commonly called social activism. The U.S. "New Left" is associated with the Hippie movement, college campus mass protest movements and radical leftist movements. 

New Post
 5/8/2012 1:40 PM
So..she got the emails..



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 29 July 2008 21:58
To: 'Samantha Brett'
Subject: RE: It is a shame about the censorship

Hi Sam,

No problem….our little planned destruction of the family problem has been around for 32 years, courtesy of the Whitlam government…….it will wait a little longer before it is solved, it’s not going anywhere.….I think we can correct the underlying issues in about 10 years…….we shall see… 

Hope you are enjoying LA. 

Best Regards 

Peter Nolan


-----Original Message-----
From: Samantha Brett []
Sent: 29 July 2008 00:02
Subject: Re: It is a shame about the censorship 

hey pete - been in LA so have a backlog of 1000 emails. will get to it as soon i get a chance. s.

Samantha Brett
Ask Sam! (Sydney)
or (Melbourne)

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:08 PM

So...on 29th of january 2009...I sent this letter to the SMH and you can see who I sent it to.

The most amazing thing about this email was that the NEXT DAY which was a SATURDAY the SMH released the Kevin Rudd essay article on interventionist guvment and more equality...I was amazed that the SMH responded like this...this is what reporters at the SMH knew in JANUARY 2009.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 29 January 2009 23:52
To: ''; ''; ''; ''
Cc: ''
Subject: The New World Order and Censorship on the SMH 

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." -- William Colby (Former CIA Director) 

Dear All,

As all of you, except maybe Miranda, are aware. The SMH is heavily censoring my postings to Sam Bretts and Sam deBrittos blogs. 

The SMH is acting as a propaganda mouthpiece of the New World Order. No question. 

I have now gathered up more than enough evidence of this and passed it along well and truly out of the reach of the gentleman your masters sent to ask me if I was interested in joining the New World Order rather than opposing it. 

Three sites that are most effective in communicating exactly what the New World Order is all about are these:

If you really want to educate yourself you might also want to go to and read Chapter 14 of the free book to learn about how governments all over the world, including your Australian Government has been committing genocide. 

Each of you might want to listen to the words of the late John F. Kennedy. In this speech he made a call for the media industry to expose a “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy”. 

President John F Kennedy Secret Society Speech version 2

I’ll copy a portion of his speech below just in case you don’t want to view the YouTube video. You can read the full text here.

JFK said: 

"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. 

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. 

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. 

That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion. 

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent." 

So, having said all that, and having been willing to identify myself and put myself in harms way of the New World Order, each of you might be wondering: 

“Why is it that Peter keeps posting around here when he knows full well we have the power of the pen to delete anything he says? What is this all about?” 

Well, as I have pointed out, your government has committed genocide. The 35 people killed at Port Arthur in a government operation (or would you all rather believe Barry Unsworth was clairvoyant?), one of whom was a friend of mine, is a drop in the bucket. The fluoride in the water, the aluminium in the deodorants and cooking utensils, the mercury in the vaccines, the BPA in our plastics…..these are all things are killing people every day in Australia. The evidence is not up for argument. It is conclusive. 

All these things are part of the plan to reduce the world’s population down to 500M people, or didn’t your New World Order masters let you in on that little secret? 

All, it is as simple as this. The elite are attempting global genocide on a scale never before seen in the world. They then propose to enslave those that are left over. You can check out the links at the bottom. FEMA in the US has purchased millions, you read correctly, millions, of temporary coffins. They have the concentration camps set up, fully equipped with gas chambers and furnaces for burning the bodies. They did not do this ‘by accident’. Bush, Cheney and the head of homeland security have been talking up another major ‘terrorist attack’ that might well be biological or nuclear….so they will ‘luckily’ have already built the concentration camps…oh…survivor camps for the ‘contaminated’ where they will be ‘humanely disposed of’. Also known as ‘freedom fighters’.

The world is about to see evil on a scale that it has never, ever previously witnessed. And there is very little time to stop this from happening. 

Already, my expectation that a revolt against the elite is likely to cost millions of lives, but to do nothing will cost billions of lives. 

All….You are, each and every one of you, fully aware that you are committing treason and betraying your fellow citizens by not allowing this story to break in your newspaper. 

You want to know that the evidence of this has been passed along outside my control. It has been passed through multiple blinds so even I do not know who has this evidence any more. It will also be published to the web should the SMH choose to continue to be a propaganda agent for the New World Order. 

This leaves each of you in a very difficult position that you likely do not realise you have placed yourselves in. 

You see, if your masters are successful they will not be in need of ‘newspapers’ or journalists or editors. Just as they will not be in need of politicians, lawyers, judges and most of the medical community. All of whom participated in this betrayal of their fellow citizens. 

What, exactly, do you think your masters are going to do with you if they are successful? If you believe their stories that you have a future going forward you might want to remember that these are the most evil people on the planet who will do anything to achieve their ends. Killing babies with ‘immunisation’ programs is ‘par for the course’. If you think you have a future with these ‘people’ you might look into their track record a little more….especially all those dead scientists. 

Your masters have probably not told you that they have built underground cities to survive the coming nuclear winter in the northern hemisphere. I am aware of people who have already got their ‘get out of the nuclear winter’ ticket so I am guessing that those who are going to be among the lucky ones who get to live in one of the tens of thousands of underground cities are starting to be told about this part of the plan. 

In all likelihood, I would say certainty, the elite are going to toss the media, judges, lawyers, doctors to the masses who will find out that they are complicit in organising their extermination. I can’t see that being a ‘go forward’ option for most of those people. People like you. 

So, each of you, as individuals, have a choice to make about your future now that you are reading this email. 

  1. Serve your elite masters and take your chances that some of the most evil people on the planet will keep their promises to you and actually let you live. (And if any of you pick that option I have a nice bridge I’d like to sell you.)
  2. Work on breaking the story of the elites plans to kill billions of people and throw yourself on the mercy of those masses in their judgement of you. Men are mostly good. They can be very forgiving in such cases. They might even protect you from the elite because the elite will attempt to kill you. They will surely track down your relatives and kill them. No question. By turning your back on the elite you will be almost certainly condemning those close to you, who can not run and hide, to death. That is the price they will pay for your treachery so far. Their bad luck you joined the elite. 

As you can each see. By aligning yourselves with these evil men you have put yourself in a most undesirable position. 

So, the question remains for each of you. Are you going to allow me my right under the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19 Freedom of speech and freedom of expression? Or are you going to censor me and deny me this right in service of your masters? And are you going to work on breaking this story? Are you willing, like me, to put your trust in God and fight for the rights of those you love? Or are you not willing to put yourself out for your family, your friends, your loved ones? 

You may wonder why I picked ‘feminism’ as the ‘issue’ by which to wake men up. This is because ‘feminism’ was invented by the elite for the specific purpose of destroying the society before WW III was launched so that men were so dis-associated from women and children that they would not fight and die to protect them. This will make it easier for the elite to kill the women and children. 

My proposal is to wake up enough men to the fact that ‘feminism’ is destroying our society one family at a time and link it back to your elite masters. This is obvious, and I am not afraid to tell you this. Sure, you will pass it along to your masters. But they already know who I am. If they wanted me dead I would already be so. They want me alive. And if you do not understand why, you need to re-read 1984. Indeed, right now, the elite need ME much, much more than they need any of you. It’s rather amusing when you think about it. 

So….Are you going break this story? Or are you going to continue your betrayal of your fellow citizens and be subject to their wrath when they find out your roles in this conspiracy? 

Lastly. Just in case any of you have any thoughts that I am ‘a loon’ and this idea of the elite taking over the world is not real. Try these quotes from on of the elite puppets who was betrayed by the elite.   

Adolph Hitler was told that the UK would NOT declare war against him by the elite. After all. Stalin invaded Poland at the same time yet the UK/France only declared war on Germany…..oops…. 

"In the size of the lie there is always contained a certain  factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people.... will more easily fall victim to a great lie than to a small one."  -- Hitler, Mein Kampf. 

"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it... Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise." -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1923 

"It is a quite special secret pleasure how the people around us fail to realize what is really happening to them." -- Adolf Hitler 

"What good fortune for governments that the people do not think." -- Adolf Hitler 

And if you think this conspiracy is too big to believe…… 

"Those conspiracies that are too incredible to be believed, are by the same right, those which most often succeed." -- Marshall McLuhan, philosopher 

Dear All,

By censoring me, and by blatantly man bashing through your propaganda mouthpiece called a newspaper, you have made your bed. Now you are laying in it. 

I am sure it is not comfortable now you know what you have actually done. 

I wish you the best in your deliberations as to what you are going to do with yourselves. 

Personally, I believe your only hope of personal survival is to run and hide and perhaps to attempt to break this story via a web site, and help me get the word out. 

Have a good weekend. 

Peter Nolan 

More interesting links…..just in case you think this is ‘not real’. 

New World Order for Dummies.

Marshal Law = Gas chambers

Obamas coffins waiting for you.

Coffins for the NWO

Notes on the meeting of Congress in March 08.

Lou Dobbs comment on New World Order

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:10 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:10:47 PM
And this was my followup when the Kevin Rudd article was released. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 30 January 2009 23:32
To: ''; ''; ''; ''
Cc: ''
Subject: RE: The New World Order and Censorship on the SMH

Hi All,

I see by the headline on the front page this morning you have given me a nice clear answer as to how you believe you should move forward.  

I was wondering if Rudd was a puppet until about last November when he gave a speech at the press club when he clearly communicated he was a puppet of the New World Order. A headline like this and comments like these make it pretty plain. Let me interpret what he says for you: 

"The time has come, off the back of the current crisis, to proclaim that the great neo-liberal experiment of the past 30 years has failed, that the emperor has no clothes," 

Interpretation: The Australian people are so stupid and their memory is so short because they have already forgotten labor was in power for 13 of those 30 years. And they are stupid and fluoridated enough to totally miss the point that the current ‘crisis’ was deliberately manufactured and we are merely using a crisis we manufactured deliberately to remove the rights of the Australian ‘sheeple’. 

"Neo-liberalism and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy. And, ironically, it now falls to social democracy to prevent liberal capitalism from cannibalising itself." 

Interpretation: The Australian people are so dumbed down that they not only swallow ‘democracy’ as a good form of government they will swallow ‘socialism’ and ‘democracy’ put together into ‘social democracy’ and they will even believe that ‘liberal capitalism’ was the cause of the current crisis. 

(My comment? If the Australian people are stupid enough to believe this rubbish they deserve to be enslaved.) 

"A system of open markets, unambiguously regulated by an activist state, and one in which the state intervenes to reduce the greater inequalities that competitive markets will inevitably generate," 

Interpretation: ‘Activist state’ means ‘totalitarian state’. ‘Reduce the greater inequalities’ means ‘everyone lives in poverty and slavery’.  Just like all the happy campers who were living in Russia from 1917-89. I like the idea “free market fundamentalism….has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy.” This, is in fact correct. But it is the personal greed of the elite and the elite are also behind ‘social democracy’. 

So, there you have it. Kevin Rudd, in your Prime Minister, calling for a New World Order. A New World Order that will be a totalitarian state where the government has total control to do whatever it wants “for the benefit of the people” of course. Just like Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and Mao Tse Tung…who were all in the NOW. 

I guess that answers my ‘unasked question’ as to whether the likes of each of you are going to side with the New World Order, a movement that has already killed at least 1M of your fellow citizens since 1945. A movement that caused the start of both world wars and is trying to start a new third World War. 

It’s pretty clear each of you has chosen which bed you wish to lay in. 

I wish you the best of luck when the Australian people find out about your betrayal as they inevitably will. 

Good luck….you are going to need it… 

Peter Nolan

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:11 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 06 February 2009 01:07
To: ''
Subject: FW: Herald Publications: Your contact with ReaderLink.

Hi Sam,

Just in case you question whether 'Justine and Ben' put in writing you are the moderator. This too will be published.. ;-)

Have fun drinking your fluoride, aspartame, and BPA today....there is nothing you can drink in Sydney that does not contain poisons...they have all bases covered....while in GERMANY they can't put fluoride in the water because enough people know Hitler did it and why... ;-)

Best Regards


-----Original Message-----

From: Reader Link []

Sent: 15 December 2008 03:18


Subject: Herald Publications: Your contact with ReaderLink.

Dear Peter,

Recently you contacted ReaderLink. The following outlines The Herald's response:

We have forwarded your email to Samantha Brett who is the moderator of the blog.

Your interest in Herald Publications is appreciated and has provided us with valuable feedback.    

Please quote 00136339 if you wish to contact ReaderLink again.


Justine & Ben

Contact us:

02 9282 1569

9.00 am - 3.00 pm Monday to Friday (except public holidays)

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:12 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 06 February 2009 03:49
To: 'Sam Brett'
Subject: RE: Herald Publications: Your contact with ReaderLink.


They are called ‘people’ not ppl... 

Try watching this might learn something. This is what your friends the elite are up to. You know, the people you are protecting and working for.

Sam. You run the ‘relationships’ blog on the most prestigious newspaper in my home state. It was your choice to do that. 

I am not going anywhere. We are going to break this story with you or without you. 

Something that might soon dawn on you is this. 

By censoring someone who has come to your blog to break this story it is most likely that you have destroyed any chance you had of a future job in the public eye. The public don’t like being poisoned and killed if you read your history books. They don’t take kindly to those who knew and let it happen. If you have destroyed your future work prospects? Well, that’s why honour and integrity are important. 

It won’t matter if it was ‘your people’ who did the censoring. It is your face on the blog and you are responsible for what goes on it. You get paid for your blog Sam. Men are going to hold you responsible for what did and did not go on it. Your editor could have picked up this story at any time and broken it gently to the people of Australia. He didn’t. This is a war, and there will be sacrifices. Your editor may make you one of them. These people kill women and children. They are not going to be concerned it one columnist is put out of a job. Nor will I be for that matter. 

Personally, if I were you, and a woman, and I learned I was part of a conspiracy to keep the truth from the public about genocide, planned destruction of the family, planned destruction of relationships? I’d just walk away. (Or stop the censorship if you are really brave.) 

If you choose to continue to keep the facts of this matter from the Australian people there is nothing you can do to stop this information getting into the public domain. Nothing. It will mean the end of any public profile for you. If you had honour and integrity, you would not be in the position in which you have placed yourself. 

Now, I wish you a great weekend... :-) I hope you have a great time. I really do. 

I have nothing against you. It’s not personal. It’s merely that you censored me and I will expose that to your family and your friends and your employers. 

So you make up your mind what you are going to do. 

We have our plans, and we are not about to listen to a ‘please take your posts somewhere else’ from you or anyone else. 

The SMH is going to break this story whether your editor likes it or not. Starting with feminism. 

Best Regards 

Peter Nolan 


-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Brett []
Sent: 06 February 2009 00:15
To: <>
Subject: Re: Herald Publications: Your contact with ReaderLink. 

I have ppl doing it for me as I am in meetings. Pls take it up with 

another blog xxx 

Sent from my iPhone 

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:13 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:14:17 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 09 March 2009 01:33
To: ''; ''; ''; ''
Cc: ''
Subject: RE: The New World Order and Censorship on the SMH

Good evening all,

Sam deB… really think banning me and vilifying me on the way out is going to get rid of me? Unlike you, I am a real man, and all that means. 

The people on this email are now aware of the plans of the New World Order to kill 80-90% of the population and to enslave the rest. 

Each of you has chosen, of your own free will, to support your New World Order masters by participating in the endless drum beat of anti-male propaganda that your newspaper spews out day after day….as in the story this morning. 

Well, your lords and masters have been busy. If you click on this link you will see the first discovered case of H5N1 (bird flu) being injected into the Human flu vaccination supply chain.

Yes, that is correct. 

Your lords and masters at the New World Order, of which Kevin Rudd is merely a puppet, have stepped up their efforts to kill people by injecting (and I do mean injecting) H5N1 into the human food/vaccine/etc supply chain. We are expecting many other pathogens to be pushed into the food chain. We are also expected global crop failures and poisoning of the water. It’s not going to be pretty. 

I sent you evidence of genocide perpetrated by the World Health Organisation and in response you ban me and censor me. That’s fine, and to be expected. 

What do you people think the common men of NSW are going to do to you when they find out you knew about these things and you shut up and let it happen? Indeed, actively participated in the ‘cover up’? For each of you, the future is very uncertain if not outright bad. Because you are public figures supporting the New World Order and the genocide of your fellow citizens you will not be protected by your elitist friends. My guess is they will pass you to the mob when the time comes. 

So. Still want to ban me? Still want to support your lords and masters? Still want to stay quiet now you have cold hard proof they are trying to get a pandemic started? Or are you so naïve and gullible you think that a vaccine manufacturer can ‘accidentally’ put one of the most deadly viruses known to man into the human vaccine supply chain??  Like they put mercury into vaccines today to poison our babies…… 

Remember…there is no way you can now stop the fact that each of you were mailed this information from getting into the public domain…no way at all. 

Over the next few months I am now expecting the New World Order to take the gloves off. Perhaps the government will set more fires….Oh yes, they set the fires….we just can’t prove it yet….but your newspaper carried so many photos of ‘Saint Kevin’ to give him his photo opportunities there is no doubt among any of us who, exactly, is responsible for killing those 200 Australians. 

Anyone feel like a flu shot? 

Peter Nolan

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:15 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:15:52 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 13 March 2009 02:32
To: ''
Subject: You are funny Sam


You are funny…LOL! You even posted one of my posts today, the one on the declining happiness of women, while also removing the reference to the censorship you are exercising. I laughed just a bit when I saw that. 

Sam, it’s like this. The Illuminati know who I am. They tracked me down just a few weeks after I started posting in the SMH which is the only place I blog using my real email address. I did it to get the attention of the editor. I wanted him to be able to go read my web site and note just who I am. I am not some dumb smuck he can flick off like a piece of lint. My family is very well respected and I am well connected. 

However, since the Illuminati is not adverse to killing people, I am not keen to draw my family into this situation. Any attempt to injure members of my family will be dealt with in the most harsh of terms. I had figured they tracked me down to kill me but they seem not interested in doing that yet. 

The reason they tracked me down is that they know what I am proposing has a small chance of working and they don’t want anyone out there with even a small chance of stopping them. 

Let me share with you just how much the Illuminati are bothering with me right now…..Last week we had the first offer on our house which the court ordered to be sold last June……I said no to the offer. In my rejection letter I accused the Australian Federal Magistrates Court, indeed, the entire polical and judicial system of Australia to be totally corrupted by the Illuminati and suggested that these corrupts judges and magistrates will do anything and everything they can to prosecute and persecute me. My ex, as expected, handed this email into the court in her affidavit to get a judgement that I should be stripped of all ‘rights’ to any decision making power on my property, that I earned and she didn’t, in favour of handing all these rights to her. 

Of course, the corrupted court agreed. But it didn’t end there. The next day was the very day Sam deB bans me….for a post talking about the very positive relationship my girlfriends and I had at 18 after we split. Who called Sam deB and told him to ban me with a bogus excuse? 

And, to add to my little difficulties, the magistrate who was scheduled last September of so to hear my final application for financial settlement in late april has his clerk call to say that he suddenly has something else on those two days and that my settlement, which I was told could NOT be moved, would be put back indefinitely and I would not even be given a date for a hearing to consider talking about  a date until June/July time frame… 

So you want to note that. The woman was given a court hearing inside 24 hours and the decision making rights were handed to her 2 business days later…….and my right to have my case heard in the court was suspended indefinitely. 

This is oppression. This is tyranny. The wholesale removal of rights. However, you women are so stupid that you think that because you are ‘winning’ the gender war by your courts and your government stealing from men and giving you things that you are somehow ‘on top’. You do not realise that the very reason men are being oppressed and driven away from women is to make women and children easier to kill. Easier to oppress. Why? Because men will be so oppressed and so sick to death of the abuse handed them by the state at the behest of women that they will not defend them. I am a great example of that. I would never, ever help another woman in distress, even though I have done so many times in the past. 

Unless men like me stop the Illuminati Sam they ARE going to kill billions and enslave the rest. 

So…I kind of wondered why you even bothered allowing one post to stand…..I am wondering if your knowledge now that these evil men you serve give women breast cancer while handing them houses with the other hand might not be unbalancing you just a bit. I am wondering if knowing that they are making every effort to get a bird flu pandemic underway as well as a collapse of the food chain and water supply might not be disturbing you. 

You see…I have already made up my mind how I will survive the coming maelstrom…..the holocaust…..if I survive the first nuclear/biological attacks…..You want to know how? If pushed, I will likely have to kill women to eat them. They will be one of the few plentiful sources of protein and liquid around. Just the healthy ones mind you….Now, some women find that notion ‘upsetting’. Why? Women are constantly abusing men and kicking them to the gutter and laughing about it. Men are committing suicide at 4x the background population rate in divorce. And all that is completely un-necessary…it is driven simply by the greed and selfishness of women programmed into them by evil men and enabled by a corrupted legal system. Women do not HAVE to do this. Whereas, when the global holocaust comes, there will be no food to eat. Men, being larger and physically stronger, are simply going to have to kill those people less able to defend themselves to survive. And if you think there are not a LOT of men who would do this, try reading the stats on just how many men have been kicked to the gutter over the last 30 years by greedy women. 

If I were you Sam, as a twenty something, I would be very, very worried about your future. Because if the Illuminati win, you are 80-90% probability to end up dead. And if you survive you are a 100% probability to be enslaved.  If you want to hear their plan, listen to Gordon Brown in Congress last week. If you knew what to look for that speech should scare the hell out of you. 

Oh…and you man Matthew who declares he is into ‘Freedom of Information’ is as corrupt as they come as well……not interested in ‘freedom of information’ when it comes to your corrupted government and legal system. 

I would love to be a fly one the wall over at the SMH as people come to realise that the Illuminati are taking over and that those who helped them do this will be purged first. Happens all the time. 

Are you religious Sam? Because a lot of people are going to meet their maker in the not distant future at the hands of the Illuminati…..

And you will love the trailer from Tom Hanks new movie. “Hide in plain sight” is a motto they have had for a long time. 

Hhhmmm…..I wonder if you won’t let a few more of my more ‘non-controversial’ posts stand….I am working on alerting men through the clear bias and censorship in the media……I am just continuing to collect the evidence because barely a day goes past without a bunch of man hating articles in the SMH…… 

Good luck…… 

See you on your blog….. 


New Post
 5/8/2012 2:17 PM
And here was a key email in may 2009.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 15 May 2009 02:41
To: ''; ''; ''; ''; ''
Subject: RE: The New World Order - Civil Law - Aspatame in your diet drinks

Hi Sam/All,

well, it's been a while since I sent you all an email. I have been keeping an eye on your endless man bashing and doing my homework. I see you are still brainwashing people and censoring anyone who provides serious and pointed comment. Not to mention licking your masters boots and kow-towing to your masters every whim and wish. You are so gullible if you think your masters will reward you. 

I have a couple of things to say to you all. You can listen or not, as the case may be. 

As you each know, I came here about 10 months ago. Last June I believe. Having figured out the media was complicit in the programming of women with feminism and complicit in the planned destruction of our society I developed the plan to use the media against the elite by exposing your duplicity. The plan put the wind up someone because one of your minions tracked me down and offered me a spot in the New World Order. My skills would be valuable. I declined. I didn't agree with killing 90% of the worlds population. Since then, your masters have been happy to just leave me alone with the occasional little nuisance efforts of bugging my emails or blocking outbound emails and stuff. Nothing of consequence. They figure there are lots like me who are getting no-where. 

It has pleased me over the last 10 months that the SMH has done exactly what I expected. Allowed me a few column inches when I look harmless enough and censor me when I went too close to the truth of what the elite are really up to. Heck, you even let a few controversial appends stand to see how many people might actually 'get it'.....and you were correct in your view that almost none would. It's all been pretty interesting reading. 

As I made clear, I came here with a plan as to how to get 'fair laws' with respect to 'Family Law' and the deal was to expose the corruption VIA the media by exposing the corruption OF the media. I was working to a 5 year plan (fast) or 10 year plan (slow). I was of the opinion I had to get the laws changed and that would take a long time. 

Well, well, well...isn't it amazing what you find when you look hard enough. I find guys like Rob Menard ( and 'Thomas Anderson'. 

Your lords and masters likely didn't tell you that the remedy for men being abused by the courts is already in place. It is called 'Common Law'. Without going into details that would spin your little heads the facts are these: 

1. Family Law, and all things we think of as laws, which are acts passed by parliament are statutes, only gain the force of law with the consent of the governed. Therefore, men who withdraw their consent to be governed are no longer subject to any statutes, including the Family Law Act and the Tax Act. 

2. The government creates a straw man via a persons birth certificate and names itself as primary creditor to that strawman and therefore no Australian can own anything unless they claim back being primary creditor for that strawman. This means men who do this will then own their property and it is out of the reach of the courts, any court.  Further, I have found that a 'hold harmless agreement' can by put in place such that men cannot be touched by any court for any statute violation no matter what the government says. 

3. And since there is no money in circulation all 'debt' is fraudulent and mortgages can be zeroed out if you know how to do it. 

In short, I have discovered how to get men out of the statute system, reclaim all their property from the government, clear their debts and mortgages, and get them out of paying income taxes ever again. Lovely! 

Since the remedy already exists I am no longer working on a long term plan to get the laws changed, I am working on the short term plan of proving all this to the AG and setting myself up for life and then helping other men do the same. 

Oh yes, I am going to leave so many feminised women penniless after their efforts to screw men over, it's going to be lovely, because the men I help? They are going to reclaim their property into their OWN names and leave these so called 'empowered women' to fend for themselves. It's going to be lovely. And since Rob Menard is setting up his own society that will run separately from government societies we will not allow members who aided and abetted the elite. Those people, people like you, we will prosecute under common law. And since you are all accomplices to murder under common law, you will face very stiff jail time. 

People like you will be stuck as members of YOUR society so you will still be paying taxes, mortgages and subject to statutes....hope you like how your masters treat you. reality, I am here to gloat just a little. You have done your best and you have lost. The only thing the elite can do now is start killing people overtly and I do believe they plan to start doing that in the Australian Spring with a new 'swine flu' epidemic which will scare or force people into vaccinations. People who are still in your society then will be vaccinated and that will be a killer shot for many.......hope you enjoy yours..... 

And the great part of finding all these things out is that we have an absolutely ready made market to contact to get going with. All men who are currently being ripped off by the CSA. You see, the CSA is also fraudulent and a man has every right to withdraw his consent to pay the CSA fraudulent payments. And there are more than 1M of those men I believe in Australia. And we can hang out in front of Family Law Offices and just hand out books and cards to point people to where they can come and get themselves out of this mess. Just imagine what is going to happen when THAT ball gets rolling…..and it’s too late to stop us now….too many people know…. 

And talking about how your masters treat you… might want to look at this movie…

This is about how aspartame kills people. You know, through brain tumors, cardiac arrest, multiple sclerosis and wood alcohol poisoning. 

It’s really interesting because it goes through how tests on monkeys and rats were known to give the monkeys grand mal seizures, brain cancers, or just kill them outright as well as give the rats brain cancers and severe potholing of the brain. 

The head of the US FDA was trying to block the use of aspartame (nutrasweet) and Donald Rumsfeld (yes, the same one) got Ronald Regan on his SECOND DAY IN OFFICE to censure the head of the FDA so that he could not bring legal proceedings against Searl of which Rumsfeld was CEO and in a month or so get rid of the head of the FDA. The new head of the FDA came in and immediately passed aspartame as ‘safe’ for human consumption. Inside 5 years the number of brain tumors in the US increased 10%. If course, when the guy who passed aspartame left the FDA he got a job at Seal as a consultant for an exorbitant fee for those days. 

Another side effect of aspartame is to damage the brains of children as well as destroy their ability to think/concentrate. They kind of live in a ‘fog’ if they have too much of this stuff, never being able to reach their potential. Similar symptoms to fluoride in that respect. 

Now, I know you people don’t care about your colleagues you work with and you are quite happy to let them guzzle down their TAB or Diet Coke/Pepsi so that they poison themselves on aspartame. But I really do wonder what you think when you walk into a macdonalds or you walk through a mall and you see little kids 5-10 years old drinking their diet cokes and other artificially sweetend drinks….or sweetened foods….all of which contain aspartame in them now? What do you think of how your masters, whom you protect, are killing these little kids. 

You Sam deB talking on your blog about ‘right and wrong’ with respect to the Andrew Johns case when you know about and you willfully support the murder of small children. Does the work hypocrite mean anything to you? The words child abuser? You are so pathetic. You really are. And your problem will be that you know it. 

So. The time is coming close. We will get lots and lots of men out of the fraudulent ‘Family Law’ system. 

And we will keep doing it until such time as your masters decide they are going to have to kill people more overtly. Then it will simply be a bloodbath and the men who are ‘awake’ will live and the rest will die in the conflict that follows. I believe now that major conflict is not avoidable. Codex Alementarius alone is forecast to kill 3B people over the next five years.  

So…now I have all the evidence I need to expose the SMH and it’s reporters as complicit in murder, and all the facts I need to get men out of the mess called ‘Family Law’, I won’t be visiting your site so frequently. 

I might pop along to say hello occasionally but now I know I do not need to gain a large number of votes to change laws, well, your newspaper has become irrelevant to the way in which I propose to achieve my goals. The SMH…..totally irrelevant… you don’t like that. 

That doesn’t mean I still do not plan to expose you all for the traitors you have been. I do still plan to do that. But that is not on top of my list. I may not even get around to it. 

I rather think your masters will do what I would wish to do to people who have played their part to be complicit in the murder of small children. 

I wish you all the very best of luck. You are going to need it. 

Now, drink up that diet coke… ;-) 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:22 PM

 And I let the censorship go on for a while before noting it out.


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 04 September 2009 03:06
To: ''; ''
Cc: ''
Subject: RE: Continued censorship on the SMH Relationships Blog

Hi Sam,

I just checked to see how much censorship you are now applying to me. Seems you are letting nothing through now. Not even the most innocuous posts. 

You know, the more blatant the censorship I report of the SMH the more questions will be asked as to just what you and your masters have to hide. They are questions you cannot avoid being asked now. Your censorship has been so persistent and so blatant that the SMH cannot avoid but be exposed. 

If you follow what is really happening in the world you will have heard the Benjamin Fullford interview on Rense by now. 

If not, you and your fellow supporters of the New World Order might like to listen to it.

The latest news, which I have yet to confirm via other sources, is that the Chinese Government has told Chinese companies that they are not required to honour the derivatives sold to them by the US. 

What does this mean if it is true? 

It means the US and Australian economies are about to drop off the edge of a cliff. 

It means the markets will lose something like 90% of their value. The amount of the derivatives that will not be honoured is said to be 10x the worlds GDP. 

The US will collapse financially and Australia will collapse with it if this is true. 

The criminally insane Illuminati who run the US and Australia may very well about to lose their financial footing in each country. 

The silent war is being fought in a very tough fashion. 

The US Illuminati are responding with passing legislation forcing mass vaccinations, kidnapping of children from schools and shipping them to Fema camps and imprisoning any adults who object. 

Try this link to see what legislation has been put before legislators in Massachusetts.

Far from the SMH actually reporting any of these goings on you are all the while censoring someone who is posting very reasonable posts in line with your published rules while allowing other people to post lies about me in your rather childish efforts to dis-credit me with your small number of readers. 

You are so funny Sam. You have dug yourself, and the SMH, something of a hole that you can not get out of. 

Make no mistake. The Australian government is killing large numbers of Australian people and wishes to step up the kill rate. 

People like you are censoring those of us who would expose the media as nothing more than the mouthpiece of a criminally insane murderous government the equivalent of the Nazis.  

Remember, “I was just doing what I was told to do”. “I was just doing my job” didn’t work for the guards in Nazi concentration camps. And it won’t work for the media people who put themselves ‘out there’ running blogs for ‘public debate’ who them protect their criminal masters by censoring people who come along and start to point to the truth of what is happening in our country. 

Let’s see if you continue with your complete censorship of me. Let’s see if you start to really wonder and question what might happen to you and the people like you who have done your best to hide and support a criminally insane government that is killing it’s citizens in large numbers. 

We have been at this little cat and mouse game a year. I have achieved what I set out to achieve with respect to ‘fair laws’ in relationships. 

Now I am focused on exposing the corruption inside the Australian Government and the genocide they are committing. Those who are complicit will be exposed. One of them would be you Sam. As will be DeBritto and the editor at the SMH. 

We live in interesting times….. 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan  

-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 26 August 2009 14:48
Subject: Continued censorship on the SMH Relationships Blog

Sent to: ,

Dear Sam and Readerlink,
you guys are really funny. You continue to censor posts like the one below that point out your censorship. LOL!

You censorship is being recorded. Instances of it are being published in the various free man societies around Australia. You ARE being exposed, albeit slowly, as hypocrites and not willing to live by the rules that you publish. Where do you think this is going to end for you? How long do you think you can continue to be the pawns of the Illuminati spreading your poison before you are 'found out' by your family and friends? What are you going to do once your family and friends know that you have been censoring people who have been trying to alert the Australian people to the genocide being perpetrated against them? Do you think your family and friends will say...."Gee, that's ok, you had to earn a buck so it's ok to censor people working on breaking the story of the genocide against the Australian people for a year. No problem."

When you even censor the post that says you are censoring posts, it just becomes funnier.

Best regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan

Posted yesterday to

Posted by: Moongirl on August 25, 2009 10:15 AM
"Peter, on a number of occasions I have sought to engage you in debate. I have asked questions based on your posts, requesting clarification, or a response. NOT ONCE have you responded to me."

Actually moongirl, I have answered pretty much every question I have seen anyone put to me directly, including you. You can not hold me responsible for the censorship that occurs on this blog. I am not the censor. I suggest you write to readerlink and insist that the moderator obey the published blog rules. I have written to readerlink and Sam many times insisting the mod obey the published set of rules. To no avail.

Posted by: HIM on August 25, 2009 10:58 AM
"I personally must have responded to you a few dozens times and you never respond."
HIM, ditto...write to readerlink and inist that the mod obey the published rules. 

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:23 PM
Now...I sent an email on 29th of january 2009 and challenged those on the email as to whether they would assist me or continue their crimes.

The NEXT DAY came out this article and it made their answer I thought I would keep the article here. 

Time for a new world order: PM

Phillip Coorey Chief Political Correspondent
January 31, 2009

KEVIN RUDD has denounced the unfettered capitalism of the past three decades and called for a new era of "social capitalism" in which government intervention and regulation feature heavily.

In an essay to be published next week, the Prime Minister is scathing of the neo-liberals who began refashioning the market system in the 1970s, and ultimately brought about the global financial crisis.

"The time has come, off the back of the current crisis, to proclaim that the great neo-liberal experiment of the past 30 years has failed, that the emperor has no clothes," he writes of those who placed their faith in the corrective powers of the market.

"Neo-liberalism and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy. And, ironically, it now falls to social democracy to prevent liberal capitalism from cannibalising itself."

Mr Rudd writes in The Monthly that just as Franklin Roosevelt rebuilt US capitalism after the Great Depression, modern-day "social democrats" such as himself and the US President, Barack Obama, must do the same again. But he argues that "minor tweakings of long-established orthodoxies will not do" and advocates a new system that reaches beyond the 70-year-old interventionist principles of John Maynard Keynes.

"A system of open markets, unambiguously regulated by an activist state, and one in which the state intervenes to reduce the greater inequalities that competitive markets will inevitably generate," he writes.

He urges "a new contract for the future that eschews the extremism of both the left and right".

He mocks neo-liberals "who now find themselves tied in ideological knots in being forced to rely on the state they fundamentally despise to save financial markets from collapse".

He advocates tighter regulation and policing of global finances, and identifies the immediate challenge as restoring global growth by 3 per cent of gross domestic product, the amount it is expected to fall in 2009. Next week, as Parliament resumes, his Government will chip in with a second economic stimulus package.

Mr Rudd commits to keeping budgets in surplus "over the cycle", meaning deficits should be temporary. In a further sign the Government is not contemplating additional tax cuts, which would deliver a permanent hit to revenue, he stresses that stimulus measures have to be paid for when the economy recovers.

Mr Rudd singles out Thatcherism as a culprit, as well as the former Howard government. His essay implicitly attacks the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, who this week urged the free market be allowed to dictate commercial property values as he slammed a Government measure to prop them up.

Mr Rudd's essay follows the blast Mr Obama gave Wall Street bankers yesterday for awarding themselves $28 billion in bonuses last year at the same time as they were being bailed out by taxpayers.

In a message to Mr Obama and the US Congress, Mr Rudd counselled against erecting trade barriers. "Soft or hard, protectionism is a sure-fire way of turning recession into depression as it exacerbates the collapse in global demand."

The message was reinforced in Davos yesterday when the Trade Minister, Simon Crean, described the "buy American" provisions of the new Obama stimulus package as "very worrying". "On the face of it, it looks like it contravenes commitments made to the World Trade Organisation," he said.

with Paola Totaro

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:27 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:28:22 PM

an email sent earlier in the year. 


-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 04 February 2009 23:54
Subject: Thank you at least for posting one of my posts

Hi Sam,
thank you for allowing at least one post to stand. It seems your editor and I are going to have something of an adversarial relationship. I would prefer he change his mind. It would work better for the Australian people for your editor to apply his own rules to the blogs he is responsible for and at least have a sort of 'by the rules' adversarial engagement. If he does not want to play by his own published rules, then he cannot expect his adversaries to play by the rules. You might let him know this since he is not want to answer his letters. Sam, you can pass along to your editor, I grew up in NSW. I lived in Sydney for many years. I have a network of colleagues who are like minded. We are going to break this story whether you and your editor like it or not.

My opinion is that it would work better for the Australian people if the truth of the conspiracy against them were revealed. It is all very well for the elite to 'solve the worlds problems' by killing hundreds of millions if not billions of people. But my opinion is those people have a right to know their leaders are killing them with fluoride, vaccines, BPA, aluminium and who knows what else that we have not found out about yet.

Call me crazy, but I propose that there are better ways to deal with the over-population of the planet than by slaughtering countless billions of innocent people. I am more than happy to provide you with such records as the fact that Nixon engaged John D Rockefeller in 1970 to head up the Commission for Population Growth (meaning reduction) and that they came back with a proposal that had 'equal rights' near the top because women out working have fewer children.

I am more than happy to share documents from the world population summit in Bucharest in 1974 that pushed womens rights, equal outcomes in the work place, increasing the status of women (but they didn't mention decreasing the status of men by villifying them) as ways of decreasing the number of children women have.

The elite are now running high profile programs to promote lesbianism and villify men each and every day. Do the song titles "I kissed a girl" and "Womaniser" mean anything to you? Our popular music has been controlled by the elite since at least the beatles. What do you think 'Seargent Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band' was all about? Why do YOU think the assassinated Lennon with an MK Ultra programmed assassin? Lennon had been talking about what he knew and they killed him for it.

Our movies, our TV, our news, and our Newspapers are all being used to program us. JFK asked the newspapers to break the story in 1961 and they didn't. In all likelyhood I believe your editor is not going to break this story and will insist on making my life just that little but harder for me to break this story. Kind of like my ex always making doing the right thing harder.

In the end my goal is obvious. With fair laws, and the removal of all the programmed hatred of men by women, men and women be able to engage in stable relationswhips again. As a side bonus the elite will lose the ability to kill people with impunity as they will come under the jurisdiction of the legal system. That is, if they are not lynched by the mob.

In the meantime.......I received word that you were the mod on your forum. I would ask most professionally and most politely that you observe your own rules. Particularly the following rules:

(d) which racially or religiously vilifies, incites violence or hatred, or is likely to offend, insult or humiliate others based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation or any physical or mental disability; or

(e) which you know or suspect (or ought reasonably to have known or suspected) to be false, misleading or deceptive.

The women here are consistently posting misleading and deceptive information about me and you know it.I have no personal beef with yourself or your editor. Your editor published rules, how about you stick by them? How about you re-read posts like this one from Dr. Phillis and note how she has posted false and misleading information in an effort to incite hatred of me among women. How about you pull up people doing this?

"websites he haunts". I am a ghost am I? At best she will be aware of a very small number of websites I have been to, the ones I have posted links to.

"A lot of these men have limited social skills". A blatant lie.

"These types of men are used to fixing problems but were unable to fix their marriage" So the woman has no role in fixing HER marriage it is all up to the man is it? Men are always at fault, never women, inciting hatred against these 'bad men who could not fix their marriage'....standard fair Sam.

"so they direct their raw emotions and anger towards "fixing" the system." I thought we were all a bunch of unemotional neanderthals? And as you well know, the 'system' is well and truely biased.

"after blaming their ex wives" Another lie. I am not 'blaming' my ex wife. She has responsibilities she did not live up to. The people responsible for programming women are the elite.

"It is because Peter is moving along the WW3 conspiracy theory spectrum" I have not written about WW III on this forum so far as I remember. So she is attempting to malign me as a 'conspiracy theorist'....a good effort and you as the mod should pull that up and ask "please quote where Peter has put on this site references to WW III or apologise for making things up he has not put here."

I have put the full post below...

As for the listing of this order of finding things out.....that would be because starting from the point of noticing women are programmed in our society and tracing back to the source, this is the order in which these things are encountered. By the way, since I have at no time mentioned these things on THIS block Dr. Phillis is making an unfounded accusation that I am the same author as another author in another web site and is taking comments out of context and presenting a summarised and twisted version here in order to muddy the waters of the discussion. Standard fare for women. Honesty is not their strong suite, according to their survey answers.

As for Dr. Phillis mentioning 'anger' three times and 'blaming'. She gives herself away. She is 'angry' and she is 'blaming'....she is merely transfering those things to 'someone else' in order to then be right about it.

So Sam, you are the moderator. How about you moderate? How about you enforce your own rules. I don't particularly wish to have a beef with you and your editor. You two are just pawns who have put yourselves in the middle of a deadly war. Not a good place to be. If your editor opens up a forum to talk about the planned destuction of our society or starts giving equal column inches to what the New World Order is up to as he does 'man bashing' so that Australian men would be educated then I would be very pleased and leave you all alone.

In the end, the choice of surviving or perishing/slavery will be up to each and every individual man to decide upon. The weapon of choice is 'knowledge'. The elite want to keep it out of reach of the common man, I want to put it into the reach of the common man. The common man will then make up his own mind as to what he will do.

I am perfectly well aware the elite fight dirty. And so are many other men. This is why the Japanese secret societies have pledged 100,000 professional assassins will be directed to targets should the elite simply not 'walk away quietly'. Should the elite go ahead with their plans many will perish. Since I am a religious man, I will not perish until my God calls me. Not many other people have that confidence and faith any more. 

I have spent many hundreds of hours on this Sam. I am not going to just 'go away', so you and your editor can play by the rules you published or not. It's up to you. I will obviously move in accordance to the lead the two of you take. Obviously you control what is put into your blog and newspaper. I control what my little band of colleagues can do.

It shall be interesting to see how we all get along over the coming year.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan

"Posted by: Dr Phillis on February 4, 2009 12:06 PM"
I agree, I find Peter an interesting specimen. The websites he haunts are filled with the divorced men who basically got the short straw in their divorces and it's quite understandable to see why a lot of the guys on these websites are so angry.

A lot of these men have limited social skills and work in male dominated industries (engineers, IT etc) so the majority of their interaction with women was with their ex-wives, it is therefore easy for them to project the flaws of their ex-wives onto all women in general. These types of men are used to fixing problems but were unable to fix their marriage, so they direct their raw emotions and anger towards "fixing" the system.

It's interesting to see how some men overcome their anger within a time period whereas others, after blaming their ex wives, then move onto blaming feminists, westernised woman, western woman, all woman, the schooling system, the media, communists, governments, the illuminati and the New World Order (don't forget the upcoming WW3)....It is because Peter is moving along the WW3 conspiracy theory spectrum that it is very hard for anyone (let alone a woman) to have any logical discussion with him.

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:28 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 05 February 2009 15:31
Subject: still censoring perfectly good posts I see... ;-)

So Sam,

Posted by: Aussi on December 10, 2008 8:36 AM
"keep it up Peter. I cant believe how in the last 20 years men have caved in to the feminazis."

"Posted by: Sam on February 4, 2009 10:33 AM"
"Until someone engages a logical and referenced debate with peter that does not include calling him a woman hater, that doesn't include calling for him to take a psych test, that doesn't include threats and that DOES include references, articles and research then you will find me dismantling the mess for disposal.

I am not peter, I do not particularly agree with all his views, but he provides articles which are hard hitting and read worthy, if a little disillusioning, that have made me think."

Posted by: One Willing on February 4, 2009 5:19 PM
"Yet I will again raise my hand to debate you, logically.
I will be surprised if you are willing, or able. However I will give you a fair chance."

If you would like a positive debate that is constructive towards relationships for the people of Australia, how about you stop censoring me? There are people on your blog very supportive of my posts, of debate in general, and even the occasional happless woman who is willing to debate me. Poor dear will be logically shredded but hey, that's her choice. It will do her no harm apart from point out how incapable she is of debating someone like me. Did I mention I did 'Clear Thinking and Argument' and a major in Philosophy (the logic side) at Uni. By the way, I also know you are using conversational hypnosis...can't imagine people will be too pleased when they find that out.

How about it Sam? I spent a long time writing the posts you censored yesterday. The men of NSW will read them one day. You have no way to stop me from publishing all that I wrote and reporting on your censorship. You are, and I mean you personally, going to look bad when that word gets out if you don't stop this censorship real soon now.

It is up to you. You are an adult. You make your own choices...and no you are not a 'victim' because you censored someone defying the rules of your blog in doing so and that censorhip comes out into the open. It is just the truth. And the truth does not victimise. The truth does not denigrate.

Remember Sam, I have personal connections to HUNDREDS of people in virtually ALL major companies in Australia. The VAST majority being men.

If you don't stop this censorhip real soon now my colleagues and I are going to write emails/letters to EVERYONE WE KNOW and point out how the SMH violates its own blog rules, incites hatred and violence against men, and censors any dissenting voice. I will have hundreds of thousands of dollars and the will to fight this battle for as long as it takes.

You have no idea how committed a man can be when he knows people were complicit in the abuse of his sick and elderly mother and innocent young son. No idea at all. The abuse of my mother, my son and of men in general is one point. The genocide of millions of Australias is another. We are going to put this right Sam, whether your editor likes it or not.

Now, go and tell your editor that he picked the wrong man to censor and to allow other people to demonise, villify, abuse in his newspaper. Let your editor decide what he is going to do. Because if he continues to take on our little group, we will make sure he never works in a newspaper anywhere in the world ever again. I am perfectly capable of doing this.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:30 PM
And here is Sam Brett telling the ridiculous lie that she has no control over her blog, the one that carries her name and her photo, and suggesting that, due to censorship, I should just try another blog. LOL!!

Can you believe this shit?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Brett []
Sent: 05 February 2009 21:22
Subject: Re: still censoring perfectly good posts I see... ;-)

Hey babe just got passed on a couple of your emails? I don't moderate and also not sure who checks. Maybe try another blog? Xxx
New Post
 5/8/2012 2:30 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:31:09 PM
And again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Brett []
Sent: 06 February 2009 01:15

Subject: Re: Herald Publications: Your contact with ReaderLink.

I have ppl doing it for me as I am in meetings. Pls take it up with 

another blog xxx

Sent from my iPhone

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:32 PM
 Modified By host  on 5/7/2012 7:32:49 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 09 June 2009 06:38
Subject: "Posted by: petersmh on June 9, 2009 1:20 PM

"Posted by: petersmh on June 9, 2009 1:20 PM
Petersmh: Please only post comments in relation to Sam's blog questions!! - Moderator."

Hi Sam,
I have pretty much given up on your blog for achieving anything....It looks like we now have our remedy for Family Court. 

I kind of just wandered back from last week to see so many 'hateful' comments by women again so I thought I would 'poke around' some more....the feminists can always be counted on to bash men no matter how clear it is the woman is at whole getting arrested story is absolutely true by the way. They buggers damn near ripped my arms out of my sockets, I had torn ligaments in my shoulders and was in pain for weeks. It was all part of the emasculation of men to be beaten down by their wives while trying to raise their families by threat of force like that. The 'must arrest' policy covers about half the US now. Guys with knife wounds from their wives get thrown in jail for the night.

I think it's funny you allow people to consistenly post lies about me, clearly based on no first hand knowledge at all, which contradicts your own published rules and my published statements in an effort to paint me out poorly.......and then you censor true posts that are relevant to every single Australia as to the fraud in their government because its not 'on topic'...LOL!. Sounds fair.. ;-)

I was very surprised you allowed the previous post to stand to be honest. It was really a 'what the hell, let's see' thing while I had something compiling.

I know you are trying to test to see how much people respond to this kind of information. You will be pleased they say 'rubbish', I am sure. The government can't get away with it's corruption without complicity in the media to hide it. We both know the press has never been free in Australia. We only need to look to the road plan of downtown canberra to know that.

My own feeling is that your government is far enough down the line with the dispersion of swine flu virus for my presence here to make much difference...but the fact you censor me does encourage me because if you go to the trouble of silencing me, I must be saying something you don't want people to hear! LOL!

I am wondering why your masters are so worried about censoring me. After all, your readership is hardly 'the masses'. It strikes me as strange that even though the readership is so small by comparison to the population or the numbers who read the front page that your masters still have this information getting on to your blog as a concern. I'd have thought by now they are so far done they could not care less. After all, you must have seen what Renew America is publishing. And hell, look at what George Green, David Icke, Alex Jones et al are saying. I am small fry but still censored.

Oh well, we shall see what happens next. You will have seen that your government is now preparing legislation to 'quarantine' people who are 'suspected of having swine flu'. Can you say 'police state'?

And we both know your masters know who I am and where I am. They haven't bothered me for ages meaning that I am not important and I can't change anything, and they may well be right. Who knows? Maybe they will offer me another job? LOL!! Heaven knows, after 12 months it's pretty clear the 'sheeple' are well nigh impossible to wake up...sigh..

I am really starting to think that they are going to try and kill the 15M Australians they have announced they want to kill. What a waste of human life that would be. Just tragic. If they do it many of my family and friends will be among the dead. As will yours. It's not a pleasant thought....makes writing new software hard to do Sam. It really does.

Anyway, have a good day's 5:30 am here and time I got some sleep.

Peter-Andrew: Nolan

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:33 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 26 August 2009 15:48
Subject: Continued censorship on the SMH Relationships Blog

Sent to: ,

Dear Sam and Readerlink,
you guys are really funny. You continue to censor posts like the one below that point out your censorship. LOL!

You censorship is being recorded. Instances of it are being published in the various free man societies around Australia. You ARE being exposed, albeit slowly, as hypocrites and not willing to live by the rules that you publish. Where do you think this is going to end for you? How long do you think you can continue to be the pawns of the Illuminati spreading your poison before you are 'found out' by your family and friends? What are you going to do once your family and friends know that you have been censoring people who have been trying to alert the Australian people to the genocide being perpetrated against them? Do you think your family and friends will say...."Gee, that's ok, you had to earn a buck so it's ok to censor people working on breaking the story of the genocide against the Australian people for a year. No problem."

When you even censor the post that says you are censoring posts, it just becomes funnier.

Best regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan

Posted yesterday to

Posted by: Moongirl on August 25, 2009 10:15 AM
"Peter, on a number of occasions I have sought to engage you in debate. I have asked questions based on your posts, requesting clarification, or a response. NOT ONCE have you responded to me."

Actually moongirl, I have answered pretty much every question I have seen anyone put to me directly, including you. You can not hold me responsible for the censorship that occurs on this blog. I am not the censor. I suggest you write to readerlink and insist that the moderator obey the published blog rules. I have written to readerlink and Sam many times insisting the mod obey the published set of rules. To no avail.

Posted by: HIM on August 25, 2009 10:58 AM
"I personally must have responded to you a few dozens times and you never respond."
HIM, ditto...write to readerlink and inist that the mod obey the published rules.

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:39 PM
And by now it was 2010 and Sam Brett was being copied on my emails to those in the federal magistrates courts. Sam Brett suppressed ALL this information.


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 08 June 2010 01:08
To:;;;; 'Jackie Vincent';; 'Justin Dowd'; 'Bill Toal'; 'dorraj robertson'; 'Sarah Bevan';;;
Subject: RE: The free man movement is now making great progress

Dear All, 


A major event has occurred that is going to be real interesting for those of you on this email.  

The original sovereign parliament of the original peoples of Australia has been reconvened. Notice has been served on the Queen and Kevin Rudd to answer the claim of the native peoples of Australia to title of all of Australia. We propose that we will also establish the rule of law in Australia. Unlike your fake statutes used to enslave people. Times are about to get real tough for all those in the fake ‘legal profession’ as we wake up vast numbers of Australians to your crimes and you systematic web of lies. 


It seems Justin Dowd and Greg McCray also wish to face a common law court for common law theft of my property. For the two Sams copied in the media and others benefit. It appears that Justin and Greg have transferred 95% of the assets that I created over the last 25 years to my ex wife. So I am now telling young men that 5% is the new 50% if you are a man. The young men are not laughing at the idea that after 25 years in a path that led me to the top of my profession globally my ‘reward’ was –EUR40K. LOL!! 

When I look young men in the eye and tell them getting married is the stupidest thing they can do and that ALL western women are liars and hypocrites for supporting the abuse of men they are not laughing. They are taking me very, very seriously. 

So yes. 5% is the new 50% if you are a man according to criminals like Justin Dowd, David Dunkley and Louise Henderson. It is interesting to see that Justin and Greg didn’t even go by the fake ‘court order’ issued by the self confessed criminal David Dunkley. They just passed 95% of the assets to my former wife. 

Well? There is a reunion of her school year coming up soon. I shall be pleased to drag her name through the mud on that one. And that will include publishing the tracking of my car and the call log of my phone which provides strong evidence of Jennifer committing prostitution. I will also be publishing the scan of the check by which Jennifer stole EUR18K from our company.  Jennifer can be tried in the court of public opinion. Her parents can live with the reputation in their town of being liars and hypocrites. They can live with the reputation in their town that while my mother was slipping into dementia and begging me to be able to talk to her grand daughter that Bill and Irene Toal and the WHOLE Toal family supported and condone the abuse of an old and ill woman in an effort to extort money from her son. 

I wonder how well THAT reputation is going to go down in a small country town like Wagga Wagga where a large number of my relatives live and a large number of people I went to school still live. I hope Bill and Irene like being despised as much as they have despised me. 


The video of the farce that is the court hearing was distributed to the Prime Minister, Attorney General, as well as the leaders of the free man movement around the world. It has now been placed

On You-Tube and is being shared with some of the key mens rights activists. I must say, they are really not very happy to see a magistrate sitting on the bench inside one of these fake courts and refusing to answer the question of whether he is operating under oath. The clear implication being that he isn’t and does not want to say so.


It is now only a matter of time before all those who committed crimes against me, who have admitted guilt by non response, are brought before a common law jury to have the remedy of the jury issued to them. The price is $A10M per person who committed common law theft against me with all proceeds going to abused men. 

That the Illuminati drones in the Media like Sam Brett and Sam DeBritto would not publish this material and even saw fit to censor me will not be lost on the Australian People. The two Sams will be flipping burgers when large numbers of Australians find out they were well aware of the genocide and refused to breath a word about it. 


Gentlemen and women? It’s real simple. You are going to ‘BACK OFF’ and face you punishment or there will be a civil war in the not too distant future. Those of you who refuse to submit to the will of the 12 man jury that issues it’s remedy verdict against you will be outlawed. And that’s likely to happen well before any civil war starts. Quite simply, David, Louise, Justin and Greg have decided to face a jury of 12 men who will not be pleased with them. Ditto whoever ‘Registrar Johnston’ is. And if Peace Officers like Paul LaLarge and Robert McClelland do not join in real soon to clean up the criminals in the political and legal fraternity they too will be facing juries of 12 men who might not be best pleased. 

Do as you will Gentlemen and women. But rest assured. We are coming for you. 

Best Regards 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
Human being

All rights reserved waiving none. Without Prejudice



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 12 May 2010 22:34
To: ''; ''; ''; 'Jackie Vincent'; ''; 'Justin Dowd'; 'Bill Toal'; 'dorraj robertson'; 'Sarah Bevan'; ''; ''; ''
Subject: The free man movement is now making great progress 

Dear All, 

The free man movement is now making great progress in exposing the crimes you and your colleagues are committing. 

I have not been able to release my video of David Dunkley and his crime of impersonating a peace officer and all the other rubbish that David went on with on the day. However, that video will be presented into evidence to the de jour jury when the time comes. 

That evidence is with Robert McClelland who is being charged one ounce of gold for each day he does not perform his duty under oath to try under common law the criminals David Dunkley and Louise Henderson. 

However, there has been one more brave man who has gone into court and video taped the whole thing and presented it to the people of Australia. His name is Harley Williamson. Here is his video. 

Your Illuminati masters have tried hard to get this video taken down from YouTube but they can not. We are also distributing this video far and wide. The people are starting to see what bunch of criminals you people in the so called ‘legal profession’ are. 

Here is another site that is also releasing details of crimes being committed by ‘policy enforcement officers’ for the private company called ‘the commonwealth of australia’. 

We have, just this week, had an implicit admission from the NAB that all business in Australia is conducted under the Uniform Commercial Code and that would include the courts. 

We know all about how the courts move from Admiralty to UCC in the fleecing of the sheeple. Justin’s many efforts to lie and deny that the courts are private companies running UCC failed. We now have irrefutable proof of the COA operating under UCC. That is to go with the proof that KRUDD/McClelland did not dispute this assertion in my claim of right. 

More importantly, your Queen is now under sustained and lawful attack via numerous brave men and women who have submitted the documented evidence of the treason of all UK governments from 1972. 

You can see the video of the latest one here. 

We know all about how the Illuminati run the Australian Government for the benefit of the owners. Parliament house is just a little bit too big of a symbol to ignore, right? Putting it at the top of a capless pyramid from the road plan? 

So, to all those of you receiving this email? 

You have all assisted in the violation of my rights to some extent or other, or been made well aware of those violations and failed in your duty to report the crime to the ultimate authority, the Australian People. I thought I would add Sam Brett and Sam deBritto to this email since they have done their best to censor me and keep their readers ignorant of the genocide as well. 

All…Take a look at the kind of people you are assisting? Scumbag thugs calling themselves ‘policy enforcement officers’ who will grab an old man and arrest and handcuff him for doing no more than exercising his rights. Charming. I hope you all feel real proud of yourselves for supporting such thuggery. These are the kind of thugs who will lord it over your children and your friends children if you let them. And that you have all remained steadfastly silent and made me spend a great deal of time and money exposing your crimes and those of your colleagues has not best pleased me. And I am the wrong person to ‘not best please’. 

The criminal actions of the legal fraternity are going to come to an end. Period. 

More than enough people know about this now. The only two outcomes that are going to occur is a peaceful return to common law or a civil war in Australia. 

Those of you who are in the legal fraternity had better start working for a return to common law because if you choose to fight a civil war against your fellow country men your fellow countrymen are going to be well aware of who to shoot first. 

The judges, magistrates, lawyers, politicians and police officers who have lorded it over them now for so long? 

They will be ‘first against the wall’ if you do not BACK OFF and take your punishment for your crimes like men. (That includes you ‘equal women’. You will get no favours from me.) 

I would not want to be in the shoes of any of those people for all the tea in china right now. 

Ladies and Gents. 

Your criminal activities are being exposed. You will be removed. 

Those who have the opportunity may take the amnesty I will offer. But criminals like Louise and David will have no such offer of amnesty. They were offered plenty of opportunities to return my property and chose to commit the criminal offense of theft by their own free will. They will be punished for this crime. 

It’s not going to be long now. 

Best Regards 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

Human being

All rights reserved waiving none. Without Prejudice

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:41 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 17 June 2010 12:19
To:;;;; 'Jackie Vincent';; 'Justin Dowd'; 'Bill Toal'; 'dorraj robertson'; 'Sarah Bevan';;;
Subject: The deception of the fake 'order' by David Dunkley revealed

Dear All, 

You are all very quiet aren’t you. Cat got your collective tongues? Especially you two Sam deBritto and Sam Brett? You write all those words for your Illuminati controlled ‘Newspaper of the Year’ but you can’t write a word about the criminals in the courts like David Dunkley and Louise Henderson? My. You two are really going to be ‘toast’ as we roll out all my correspondence to you and we roll out all the censorship you have subjected me to on the orders of your masters in the Illuminati. 

Now…on to the matter at hand. I just had cause to re-read the ludicrously fake ‘order’ prepared by David Dunkley. 

I wish to draw your collective attention to page 10 of 17 where David Dunkley writes: 

“He mouthed inanities about “preservation of his inalienable rights”.” 

He means the right of every man, woman and child living on the land known as Australia to life, liberty and the enjoyment of their property. He does not just mean my right to my property which he has violated for which he WILL pay a heavy penalty. 

No-one here needs any more evidence that those in the courts and guvment are a bunch of scumbag criminals than that statement issued on the letter head of ‘The Federal Magistrates Court of Australia’ with a seal and with the signature of David Dunkley attached. 

And to show you people just how corrupt your ‘guvment’ is? The video evidence of my so called ‘hearing’ and associated documents are with Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland who refuse to perform their sworn oaths to defend the rights of the Australian people. As a result I am well progressed in the process of establishing my own sovereign common law courts to dispense justice to Louse Henderson, David Dunkley, the soon to be found guilty Justin Down, Greg McCray, and if they do not act soon the soon to be found guilty Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland. It should be fun to try all those people! 

But I wanted to show you all, especially you Bill and Jarrod, just what a bunch of criminal scumbags Jennifer used to steal from me all I ever worked for. And I want to show you just exactly the kind of person your mother and daughter is in that she willingly and gleefully accepts 95% of all proceeds of my labour over 25 years. And I want you BOTH to know just how much contempt I have for you two and how much you disgust an honest man of honour and integrity like me in supporting these crimes committed against me. That you have aided and abetted a common criminal, your daughter and mother, in common law crimes is an indictment on your own characters. It makes YOU nothing more than a common criminal who is only too happy to support another common criminal. And in doing so you have BOTH set the example to the children known as Joshua and Josephine that committing crimes is perfectly ok and that criminals are to be ‘supported’ if only they ‘play victims’ and cry enough. 

You will read on page 3 the following: 

(1)   The parties shall direct Watts McCray solicitors…….etc

a.      In payment of the wife the sum of $A12,931.

b.      In payment of the husband the sum of $A20,767.

c.      In payment of the wife of the balance.

(2)   The parties shall direct the real estate agent who acted on the sale of …… disburse any monies held by that agent on behalf of the parties as to 70% thereof to Mrs Nolan and 30% thereof to Mr. Nolan. 

So…following this I was sent a form to sign in order to be ‘generously given’ my $A20,767.  Of course, I did not sign this form as it was merely a means of trying to create a signature that the criminal scumbags would claim was my agreement. The form was later signed by someone calling himself Registrar Johnston who will be tracked down and charged and found guilty of common law theft. 

The $A20,767 later turned up in my account but the 30% of proceeds of the sale of the house remained mysteriously absent. So I re-read all the documentation sent to me in great detail again. I also sent faxes to the real estate agent in question to determine where this money might be. 

Buried deep inside a document, on about page 7, I found that the proceeds of the sale of the house were actually ALL put into an account at Watts McCray. Clearly I was supposed to never find this out so deeply was it buried. And given that the passage of time from the movement of this money to the court order was 18 months I was clearly intended to forget if I ever did notice. 

So. Now each of you can see what a criminal scumbag David Dunkley is as is his societal buddy Justin Dowd. Because the ludicrously fake ‘order’ clearly indicates that the ‘proceeds of the sale of the house’ should be split 30/70 but the little hidden clause ‘in payment of the wife of the balance’ actually sends 95% of the proceeds of the house to the wife. 

Now. If anyone on this email list is going to try and make the case this was an accident you can just shut the fuck up right now. David Dunkley and Justin Dowd and Sarah Bevan clearly collaborated to contrive the situation where I was presented with a letter to sign that would give them the pretence that I agreed with the transfer of 95% of the proceeds of my labour to Jennifer. 

And Bill and Jarrod? That you go along with this and demonstrate to the children known as Joshua and Josephine that you agree with the common law crime of theft and you support common criminals? Well? When you shave, how to you look yourself in the mirror? 

So. All. 

This little deception has now been discovered and exposed. It will be published and it will be presented as evidence to the common law courts I am convening to demonstrate and display clear evidence of collusion between David Dunkley, Louise Henderson, Justin Down and Sarah Bevan.  It will also be sent to Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland who have been noticed lawfully that I am of the opinion that all members of the Australian Law Society are eligible for lawful assassination being the non-uniformed, non-disclosed senior officers of a foreign power waging a declared war against a native peoples causing death with undue pain and suffering. And if any of you have a question about that I suggest you read the Geneva Conventions on Warfare, specifically about ‘Protected Persons’ and how persons can waive their protected person status. 

Has the cat still got your collective tongues? Does not an ‘order’ signed by a man calling himself an ‘Australian Federal Magistrate’ telling YOU that YOU do not have inalienable rights get your attention yet? That YOUR children and YOUR grandchildren do not have the right to life, liberty and property? Does this not evoke a response yet? 

Does not the clear and exposed deception and collaboration to attempt to get my signature on a piece of paper to create pretext to rob me create enough interest in anyone on this email list to make a response. 

And by the way, yes, these emails are being published into the free man community. People are reading your names and they are seeing what a bunch of criminal scumbags you are and they ARE seeing the complicity by the likes of Sam deBritto and Sam Brett in the Illuminati controlled media. 

So Paul LeLarge? Your suggestion that I ‘go to the newspapers’ when you and I knew full well they are totally controlled seems to have marked you as a little less honourable than you wished to present yourself.  You have before you clear proof of the crimes of David Dunkley. What are you going to do about it? Me? I’ve spent two years and about $A500K bringing the rule of law to Australia for the first time. What have you done of late? 

Best Regards 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

Human being

All rights reserved waiving none. Without Prejudice

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:44 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 04 October 2010 13:20
To: ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; 'Jackie Vincent'; 'Justin Dowd'; 'Bill Toal'; 'dorraj robertson'; 'Sarah Bevan'; 'Piarais Neary'; ''
Subject: Letter requesting proof of claim for copyright from Ausscript Australia

Dear All, 

Word has reached me that efforts are being made by ‘Australian Authorities’ to remove the video recording of the ‘court meeting’ that I attended on 2009-11-26 with the criminal calling himself David Dunkley from you tube. 

I am not sure why they are bothering since this video has already been widely spread around as has the transcript of the so called ‘meeting’. Are you so afraid of a few hundred views on you-tube? 

Ausscript Australia made numerous claims that the transcript was copyrighted. I asked three times for proof of that claim and it was not forthcoming. The third time I made it a lawful notice. You can find that lawful notice attached. As you can see, the expiry time for that lawful notice has now passed and as such Ausscript has waived any future claim to copyright of the words uttered in that meeting. 

If any of you are interested? 

I have now ‘gone public’ in my own name. You can all thank Michael Toal for that. He decided that it was appropriate to commit more crimes against me showing just how bad a job Bill Toal had done of raising his children. He now has 2 of 5 that have committed crimes and will be punished for doing so. 

By going public I have been able to release the annotated transcript of this meeting as well as the ‘order’ put out by David on 2010-02-26. Those of you who are interested can click here to read my annotated comments on the transcript. This transcript is now with many people as are the rest of my documents.

Yes. Emails like this are being put into the public domain for people to read to see just how corrupt all you people are. That is has now been 10 months since this video was sent to Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland and nothing was done by those two makes it very, very clear to all those who read my materials that the corruption includes Rudd/Gillard and all the rest of those who call themselves ‘leaders’. 


Just so you can pass this along to your coward of a boss. He is going to be put on trial at my old high school auditorium. Whether he bothers to show up or not will be up to him. If he refuses to come to Wagga Wagga for my meeting? Well? I flew from London to Sydney for his ‘alleged meeting’. So I don’t think the jury will be cutting him any slack for not coming to Wagga Wagga to defend himself against the allegation of common law theft. 

Of course, since he is guilty, he will be found guilty and I will ask the jury to make a suitable remedy such that other magistrates get the message that they may not commit crimes with impunity. 

And the two Sams? You can rest assured that theses emails are being seen and collected by people so as to realize that the Sydney Morning Herald was well informed of the crimes of the judiciary and that the Sydney Morning Herald did NOTHING to report these crimes as you have an obligation to do. 

Yes, ladies and gentlemen. Now it gets interesting. I have all the evidence of all the crimes I need by Louise and David and that evidence is irretrievably in the public with my name attacked. There’s not point killing me now. Too many people know about what was done in my case and too many people will be able to find the evidence too easily 

It’s time for David and Louise to ‘face the music’ of a common law de jour jury. We shall let 12 good men of Wagga Wagga decide if they are all slaves and have no ownership of any property. 

Best Regards 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

Human being

All rights reserved waiving none. Without Prejudice 

New Post
 5/8/2012 2:46 PM



-----Original Message-----
From: Info []
Sent: 06 October 2010 15:01
To: ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; 'Jackie Vincent'; 'Justin Dowd'; 'Bill Toal'; 'dorraj robertson'; 'Sarah Bevan'; 'Piarais Neary'; ''
Subject: Australian Federal Police Violations of my Claim of Right

Dear ALL,

As you are well aware I have placed the video recording of my ‘court meeting’ with the coward calling himself David Dunkley onto you-tube. 

By the way? I have every right to call David the coward that he is and if he doesn’t like that he can start acting like a man and facing the man accusing him of common law theft. He might like to actually REPLY to a lawful notice as well, eh? All that ‘power’ of ‘sitting on the bench’ and he can’t handle one layman and openly discuss the issue of his crimes? Shows you how much legitimate ‘power’ you people have. None at all. 

I will remind each of you that I recommended to David that he allow Louise to continue on with my particular case and that should he turn up on the day and attempt to violate my rights that was HIS choice and I would hold him accountable and responsible for HIS actions. 

I hold the right to video any dispute and for any dispute to be public under my claim of right that was accepted by YOUR Queen. 

Here is the text from my Claim of Right. 

“Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture as electronic video and sound said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.” 

Well? It seems like the coward David Dunkley is a little ‘upset’ and is using his privileged position to further violate my common law rights. I have information that claims that someone within the ‘legal fraternity’ has leaned on the Australian Federal Police to lean on Google to have my videos removed from You-Tube. Further? I have information that the Australian Federal Police are, as I type, organizing a Denial Of Service attack on my personal web site. 

How about that? Little old me with 270 views on my web site and the ‘big powerful Australian government’ is trying to shut me up. 

I would remind all readers that my claim of right says “I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly”. So, by David showing up in MY COURTROOM he WAIVED any right and any claim to any right of privacy. HIS QUEEN and HIS PRIME MINISTER did not rebut my claim of right and as an employee of the private corporation known as THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA David has an obligation to observe rights agreed by his employers. If he did not want his face on this video he should have not walked into MY COURTROOM. 

So. Today I will be writing to the man calling himself Eric Schmidt and the woman calling herself Julia Gillard with lawful notices. Eric will be told I hold HIM personally responsible and personally liable for any crime any of his employees commit against me. Julia will be told that I will hold HER personally responsible and personally liable for any crime any of her employees commit against me. 

Julia will also be lawfully noticed that she is the CEO of a private company called THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which is nothing but a registered entity on the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore it is a FOREIGN POWER. So should Julia allow my common law rights to be violated by those in the employ of a FOREIGN POWER for the purpose of subversion of the course of justice and the oppression of the people of the land? This has a name. It is called TREASON. And if Julia Gillard allows this I reserve my right to place her on trial for the crime of TREASON. Should the jury of 12 men find her guilty? The penalty for TREASON for men for a thousand years has been to hang by the neck until dead. Well? I wonder if Julia would like to be treated ‘equally’ to all those men? We shall find out if she is so ‘brave’ as to wish to ‘be like a man’ when that fate is to hand by the neck until dead. Or we shall see if she cowers at that point in time should it come. 

To Sam de Brito and Sam Brett?

I would suggest you return to me an email address and a fax number for the Editor of the Sydney Morning Herald. I already have all the evidence I need that you two have been well informed of the crimes of David Dunkley and that you have not done your duty to the public to inform them. It’s high time that had your editor have the same opportunity. ;-) 

To Justin Dowd and Jackie Vincent?

I will fax this letter to your main fax number and write on it that I wish it be passed to you by hand. That you are both so cowardly as to block my emails tells me exactly the character of you two, as if I didn’t already know. And Jackie? I pity your child. To have a mother like you is such a hardship and disadvantage that that child is going to have to bear. How does that child have any chance in life when it’s mother (I do not know if you had a boy or a girl) is such a liar and a thief like you? Have you no honour? Have you no concern for giving your child a role model to look up to? I guess not. The same way Jennifer had no concern in being a role model for her children by committed crimes against me. My mother left school at 14 and didn’t get any ‘fancy degree’. But she knew the value of honesty. And that makes her a THOUSAND times better mother than you right there. 


I have given you ALL, Jennifer, David, Louise, Sam & Sam an abundant amount of time to settle disputes and inform thee public of the crimes being committed in the Family Court system in Australia and around the world in the relative private. I have also given you plenty of time to report and talk about the damage vaccines, aspartame, fluoride and various chemicals added to the food supply cause. You have all spurned your opportunities to break this news to the good people of Australia and come out on the side of truth, right and justice. You want to complain about me making this public? Tough. Rebutt my claims on affidavits signed under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability. It’s time that you were all exposed as those who would keep the ‘lid’ on these crimes.

The next time people like you are want to ‘screw a man over’? You might just check up on the character of that man. There are not many like me it seems. That surprises me. But it only takes one man to expose your crimes. If Jennifer had done as her father told her to do and accept my initial very generous offer? I might have stayed ignorant of all these crimes being committed because, quite frankly, they are so unbelievable. However, once I found out? I am obliged to ‘look after those less able to look after themselves’. By the way? So do each of you. 


If you want to know who to hold responsible for the ‘pickle’ you all find yourselves in? Look no further than Jennifer, Fiona Brassil and Jackie Vincent. These women are nothing but greedy liars. If it were not for them trying to use the corrupt system to steal from me I might have remained ignorant of the corrupt system. 

In my meeting with Jackie on March 7th 2008 it became clear to me she was lying through her teeth. I just didn’t know about what. Well? It was about EVERYTHING. Well done Jackie for ‘tipping me off’. Along with that other little blonde trollop that had the audacity to call me at 4am to tell me there was ‘no real news’.  She is a terrible liar. You women think that a man who has lived with a woman who is a consummate liar for 20 years can’t spot a woman who is a bad liar? Did you really think I was that stupid you could lie to my face like that and me not notice it? Did you really think I was so stupid that I didn’t know the best way to find out what was going on was to tell you that I wanted to continue? I guess other clients simply don’t look too hard at what is being said. Bad luck you I have a long history in contract law. 


the REAL confrontation starts now. You thought you could steal all my ‘money’ off me, cast me into poverty, have me be suicidal and be done with me? Well you all know the saying “what does not kill you makes you stronger”. Well? I came though the worst you could throw at me. The kidnapping, mental and emotional abuse of my former children by their mother, father alienation, and impoverishment. Do ANY of you think you have anything else you can throw at me? Really? You think you can do ANYTHING worse to me than take my son off me by threat of force and using lies and deceit? There are things worse than death for a man. And that is one of them. How stupid are you people to think you can do that to a mans son and not have him look for who is really responsible? 

Each and every one of you should be ashamed of yourselves in your role in this sordid suite of crimes committed. 

If you had any honour you would come forward to be tried fairly and justly before a jury of your peers for your part in either committing these crimes or hiding them from the people who live on the land known as Australia. You would accept your punishment and beg the forgiveness of your fellow Australian people. Because to continue to try and hide behind your bogus ‘legal system’ and to continue to lie to try and avoid justice is just going the make the members of the juries some of you will be facing that little less anxious to be merciful. 

If I were David, Louise, Justin? I would quit now, admit guilt in your part in stealing the proceeds of my labour, my property, ask for a jury trial, and beg forgiveness. 

For as my mother taught me when I was little. If you do something wrong, as soon as you realize it, admit it, take your just punishment, beg forgiveness, promise to not do it again, and all will be forgiven. That is how a little boy was taught to restore his honour by a good mother. It seems those on this list didn’t have mothers so good. 

Best Regards 

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

Human being

All rights reserved waiving none. Without Prejudice 

New Post
 5/9/2012 6:08 AM
 Modified By host  on 5/8/2012 11:09:12 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan []
Sent: 08 May 2012 20:07
To: ''
Cc: ''
Subject: Sam Brett Criminal Aiding and abetting genocide and other crimes by criminals

Sam Brett,

Just to do you the courtesy of letting you know I am now publicly denouncing you as a criminal for aiding and abetting the ongoing genocide in Australia. 

You have had FOUR YEARS to speak up. 

Your silence has been well noted and well recorded.

Peter-Andrew: Nolan© 

Previous Previous
Next Next
ForumForumNew South WalesNew South WalesNew South Wales Parent ForumNew South Wales Parent ForumName and Shame ...Name and Shame ...Sam Brett Criminal Aiding and abetting genocide and other crimes by criminalsSam Brett Criminal Aiding and abetting genocide and other crimes by criminals