You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Welcome to the Crimes Against Fathers Forums

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Forums Parent ForumGeneral Forums Parent ForumNews on Freeing...News on Freeing...Lawful Notice to Julia Gillard Rescinding "Marriage"Lawful Notice to Julia Gillard Rescinding "Marriage"
Previous Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
New Post
 11/16/2011 1:44 AM
 

Gents,

any man in Australia can do something like this. Since I have suffed loss from this "Marriage" I have made a claim for compensation. So Julia Gillard needs to deny my claim. This is how it is done. A man does this properly? He is no longer married. I will let you know how it goes.

 

Lawful Notice To Respondent:

The human being calling herself Julia Gillard also claiming to act as Prime Minister of the Company commonly known as ‘THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’

PO Box 6022

House of Re-presentatives

Parliament House

Canberra ACT 2600

Australia

Phone: + 61-2-6277-7700

Fax: +61-2-6273-4100

 

 

8th November 2010

 

 

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

`

Notice to principal is notice to agent.

Notice to agent is notice to principal.

 

I, commonly addressed by the calling of Peter-Andrew: Nolan©, hereinafter the “Principal”, in my correct public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realized and free sentient man, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and not misleading, so help me God.

 

This Notice is addressed to the human being calling herself Julia Gillard also claiming to act as Prime Minister of the Company commonly known as ‘THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’.

 

AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO
RESCINDING CONSENT TO A MARRIAGE LICENSE
AND CLAIMED IMPLIED CONTRACTS
BETWEEN
JENNIFER MARGUERITE ROBINSON
AND
PETER ANDREW NOLAN

 

 

1.               Principal is of legal age and competent to testify.

 

2.               Principal has first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3.               Principal makes oath that on the date of 7th of October 1989 Principal and Jennifer Marguerite Robinson undertook the ceremony of ‘Marriage’ in St Pauls Church, Fernleigh Road, Turvey Park, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales on a land commonly known as Australia.

4.               Principal makes oath that he applied Principal’s Strawman signature to a document called “Certificate of Marriage” which is headed as “Commonwealth of Australia – Marriage Act – Registered Number 35078”.




5.               Principal makes oath that the “celebrant” that did countersign this “Certificate of Marriage” was a man that presented himself as a “Minister of the Anglican Church” by the name of John Cohen. A man known to myself and my bride for some time to be re-presenting himself as a “Minister of the Anglican Church”.

6.               Principal makes oath that the extract of the “Certificate of Marriage” claims that it was “registered at Sydney, NEW SOUTH WALES” on 20th of December 1989 and signed by a said “Principal Registrar” the name of whom is not discernable from the signature.

7.               Principal makes oath that he was not present at the signing of the “Certificate of Marriage” by said “Principal Registrar” on 20th December 1989 and at no time did said “Principal Registrar” contact Principal and discuss or disclose any claimed conditions of any implied contract associated with this “Certificate of Marriage”.

8.               Principal makes oath that at the date of signing this “Certificate of Marriage” no evidence was presented to Principal as to what the “COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA” actually was.

9.               Principal makes oath that only after extensive reading and research did he find in 2008 that the “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” is a sovereign entity registered on the UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and is merely a privately held run for profit corporation and not, as represented, a Constitutional Monarchy run by a government working in the best interests of the people who inhabit the land mass commonly known as AUSTRALIA.

Further. This corporation was only registered on the UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION in 1999 after the ‘referendum’ on Australia becoming a republic which was a fraudulent referendum to my knowledge.

10.            Principal makes oath that he had never, at any time, been presented with any evidence of the lawful and legal existence of an entity known as “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” prior to the time he signed the “Certificate of Marriage”.

11.            Principal makes oath that to his certain knowledge the alleged terms and conditions of the “Marriage Act 1961” have varied since 7th of October 1989. This has been done by successive “Acts of Parliament” by which the “Marriage Act” and “Family Law Act” have been vastly altered in the period between 7th of October 1989 to 11th November 2007.

12.            Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
For a contract to be binding it does NOT require all of the following and sincerely believes none exists:

a.     Full Disclosure – Meaning that both parties must be fully open in setting and agreeing upon the details and the terms of the contract. Both parties must be left with no doubt or confusion about the terms set out in the contract.

b.     Consideration – Meaning ‘that which is offered’ in the agreement. The “Consideration” must be something that all parties to the contract agree is of enough value to involve their participation in the contract. .

c.      Terms and Conditions – Meaning the structure and the requirements of the agreement and the obligations of each or all of the involved parties.

d.     Signature – This is the most important part of the Contract and is the proof that the agreement took place. It also implies ‘consensus ad idem’ or a ‘meeting of the minds’.




13.            Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
Once a contract is executed by the signing of the involved parties that the contract can be altered without such documents as a contract amendment or contract variation that must also be in writing and must also meet the 4 conditions listed above for the contract amendment to be binding and sincerely believes none exists

14.            Principal makes oath that the ‘Terms and Conditions’ to the “Certificate of Marriage” that the entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” re-presented by the non-present party calling himself “Principal Registrar” were at no time attached or presented as the “Terms and Conditions” claimed to be the “Marriage Act of 1961” to the “Certificate of Marriage”.

15.            Principal makes oath that he has never had full disclosure of the alleged “contract” as he was led to believe that the “Marriage Certificate” was a “formality” and did was not in any way, shape or form create a “contract” with the legal entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA”.

16.            Principal makes oath that at no time did the man calling himself John Cohen and presenting himself as a “minister” of the Anglican Church say that he was also acting as an agent of the entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” and therefore Principal makes Oath that it was at no time disclosed that the there would be a presumption that signing the “Certificate of Marriage” would create any sort of binding contract with the entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA”.

17.            Principal makes oath that at no time did any self declared re-presentative of the entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” make offer of consideration in exchange for signing the alleged contract.

18.            Principal makes oath that at no time did any self declared re-presentative of the entity calling itself “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” make presentation that the “Certificate of Marriage” was a three way binding contract with “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” being the superior party and claiming ownership and title of all property and offspring of the Principal and his bride Jennifer Marguerite Toal.


 

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, the free man on the land commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan© standing in Gods Kingdom do hereby say clearly, specifically and unequivocally that I rescind any presumed consent to enter into any contract with the entity known as “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” via the signature of the Trademark named PETER ANDREW NOLAN via the document commonly called a “Certificate of Marriage”.

Furthermore, I claim that all actions deriving from the claim of “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” that it had a lawful contract must be compensated under the Proposed Remedy or by a common law de jour jury or any such mechanism as can be found to be effective.

 


 

 

Further Principal saith not,

 

As Good As AVAL    _______________________________________________________ 
                                    Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of

                                    the Original Jurisdiction. Third party Intervener and aggrieved party.

 

Done this...................Day of the Eleventh Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno Domini, (8th November AD2010) near London, England.

 

 

JURAT:

ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of London, on this day personally appeared before me Peter-Andrew: Nolan© known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who executed the foregoing instrument acknowledged to me that Peter-Andrew: Nolan© executed the same as his free act and deed as true, correct complete and not misleading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KNOW all men that I, ______________________________ of  London, England, at the request of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Eigth Day of November 2010 Anno Domini, witness the above autograph of Peter-Andrew: Nolan© before

_____________________________________ and

_____________________________________.
              

                                                                                   Yours Faithfully,                          

                                                                                    By,

 

 

(Autographed)   ………………………  
All rights reserved.

Witness  1  ………………………………...                   Date: ………………….

 

Witness  2   ………………………………… 

 

 

 

 


 

Proposed Remedy

 

 

The re-presentatives of “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” have made quite a nuisance of themselves to the Principal these last three years.

 

The loss sustained by Principal has been in excess of $xxxxxxxxxxxx. The Principal has had his house stolen and sold against his will and his children kidnapped against his will. He has been subject to the crimes of extortion and theft. All these crimes were predicated and perpetrated by re-presentatives of “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” based on the false claim that there was a binding contract created by the placing of the Principals Signature on the “Certificate of Marriage”.

 

Therefore, Principal claims the following damages to be paid as fair and just compensation for the loss of property, ‘money, children, and time taken to remedy this crime against him.

 

Loss of Property:                                 $xxxxxxxxxx

Loss of Money: Watts McCray:           $xxxxxxxxxxx

Time and effort for Remedy:               $xxxxxxxxxx     

General pain and suffering:                 $xxxxxxxx        

Loss of children:                                  $A2                  ($A1 per child)

 

Total:                                                   $xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

This amount to be placed into the following account by 25th December 2010.

 

 

Since Respondent is well aware that “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” can create this ‘money’ out of nothing with no effort or expense at all Respondent is encouraged to take ‘the easy way out’ of simply making a ‘payment’ of ‘mythical money’ and we can all live happily ever after.

 

Should the Respondent believe that there is any false point on the above affidavit or wish to contest Principals Claim then counter claim may be lodged with the Principal by the date of:

 

10th December 2010.

 

Should no response be forthcoming it will be determined that Respondent has accepted the points of this Affidavit and a Default Judgement will be generated by the Principal and sent to the Respondent.

 


 

 

Notice of Intent

 

The re-presentatives of the “THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” have been singularly unwilling to respond to prior Lawful Notices. Just in case the Respondent continues this trend Principal wishes to make clear his Intent should this Remedy Payment not be made by:

10th December 2010.

 

Principal retains the right to issue a Default Judgement on his own signature and authority as Beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, to place liens against the property of Respondent or to form a court dejour and present matters of fact to the court de jour to make a judgement as to any and all violations of the property rights of Principal and any remedy for those violations.

 

Principal advises Respondent that non-response is considered dis-honour under law and that Principal reserves the right to generate default judgments by his own signature and authority as Beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, place liens against the Respondents property to be seized by the appropriate Sheriff,  or convene a court dejour to persue remedy should Respondent choose to go into dis-honour.

 

Yours Sincerely
By

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
Human Being

Signed 



___________________________________ 
All Rights, Privileges and Powers Reserved Without Prejudice

Date: ______________________________

 

 

 

Previous Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Forums Parent ForumGeneral Forums Parent ForumNews on Freeing...News on Freeing...Lawful Notice to Julia Gillard Rescinding "Marriage"Lawful Notice to Julia Gillard Rescinding "Marriage"