With respect to ‘court orders’ you are being lied to with deceptive language. You are led to believe that ‘order’ means ‘instruction’ like a man in the army is required to follow ‘orders’. Why is he required to follow orders? Because he SIGNED A CONTRACT when he joined the army and he took an oath.
But a ‘court order’ is not an instruction like in the army. It is an ‘order’ like you buy a big mac meal in McDonalds.
What must you do after you ORDER your big mac meal and before you EAT IT? You must PAY FOR IT.
So. Whenever you are given a court ‘ORDER’ it is an irrevocable order for services. It is the JUDGES/MAGISTRATES problem to find out the COST of the order before he/she orders it. Just like it is YOUR problem to find out the price of the big mac before you order it. If you don’t have the money you should not place the order.
So when you are given a ‘court order’ you have a lawful right to issue a lawful BILL for the order. Until that BILL is paid? You have no obligation to fulfil the order.
Here is proof this works. This is an ‘order’ for EUR6,000 per month. At the time of the BILL the ‘arrears’ was EUR150,000. So I issued a BILL for EUR1.5M and said I would be more than happy to pay the EUR150,000 just as soon as my BILL for EUR1.5M was paid.
I have not heard from these people since October 2009.