You are here:   Forums
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Welcome to the Crimes Against Fathers Forums

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneric Parent ForumGeneric Parent ForumMen of whom I a...Men of whom I a...Darryl ODarryl O'Bryan
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 10/9/2011 12:31 AM
 
Darryl runs a site I saw a long time ago about common law and the constitution.

So I thought it time to poke around and see if he was legitimate. 

I don't think so. Why? In the entire conversation, listed below, he refused to answer a very simple question.

Please show me the contract with the LAWFUL owners of the land known as Australia that gives the Australian Consititution LAWFUL standing. Darryl talked all around this point but refused to answer what must be a VERY simple question if it does have any LAWFUL standing. 


New Post
 10/9/2011 12:32 AM
 
Peter
I no longer consent to your jurisdiction.


Darryl




> Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> wrote:

> Darryl,
> I appointed myself to judge men I come into contact with.

> You have failed again to answer some very simple questions.

> Why?

> Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
> Sent: 20 September 2011 13:21
> To: peter@peternolan.com
> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: You seem to not be willing to answer any 
> questions

> Peter
> So who appointed you to be my judge and before you judge others take 
> to
> look
> at the size of the log in your own eye.

> Darryl


> > Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> wrote:
> > 
> Darryl,
> I saw your web site a long time ago. From reading it I figured that 
> you
> must
> be either very ignorant of the true situation or an Illuminati agent.

> I have noticed that your site is pretty active and you seem to be
> talking to
> a lot of people via email etc. So I thought it was time to find out if 
> you
> were an agent or just ignorant of the true situation.

> Much of what you have on your site is true. Taxes are voluntary etc.

> But much is also false.

> I am doing you the favour of offering you the truth and educating you. 
> I chose to do that by asking you some very simple questions that, 
> should you know the truth of the situation, you could easily answer.

> So again.

> How did the British gain ownership of the land known as Australia
> LAWFULLY
> such that the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia is NOT null 
> and
> void? And show me evidence of this.

> The truth is this. The British have NEVER had a lawful claim to
> Australia
> and they have now accepted this. The Commonwealth of Australia is a 
> legal
> entity in the US SEC. Its "Constitution" on applies to juristic persons 
> and
> NOT human beings.

> I have PROVEN this by walking into the Federal Magistrates Court and
> PROVING
> that the COA has no jurisdiction. I have served documents on the QUEEN, 
> the
> PM, AG and GG and I have created a permanent estopple that PROVES that 
> the
> COA and its constitution do NOT apply to me.

> The QUEEN and everyone on down is a criminal and I have PROVEN this.

> The Constitution is an evil document of deceit and I want nothing to 
> do
> with
> it. That you call it "your best friend" marks you as either ignorant or 
> an
> agent.

> If you are just ignorant you will notice you can't answer the question
> and
> start a discussion. If you are an agent you will insist that the
> constitution is a valid document at law.

> I await for you to reveal which you really are.

> If you an honest man and are just ignorant? You will want to be 
> educated
> and
> you will want to correct the false information you are putting out.

> If you are an agent you will not choose to be educated because you
> already
> know the constitution is a fraud. 

> "The very tyranny you and your movement are against"

> I am not a member of any "movement". Movements are collectives and I 
> am
> no
> part of any collective and never will be again. I am merely one of the 
> men
> who is committed to re-introducing the rule of law based on the jury 
> trial
> and outlawry for those who do not make a remedy ordered by a jury of 
> their
> peers.

> The Magna Carta is a document of deceit. If you knew how to read it 
> properly, you would know this.

> Best Regards

> Peter


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
> Sent: 20 September 2011 11:33
> To: peter@peternolan.com
> Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: Notice of My Will

> Peter

> The Commonwealth Constitution is your best friend if you read it and 
> understand it. What we do is help you understand it and in doing so 
> you are then able to bring about your wishes to start a jury trial 
> against the perverter's of justice.
> I have nothing to do with any organisation influencing the people of 
> this
> country other through the rule of law also known as the Law of the Land. 
> I
> do not support or am part of your illuminati. I am aware of the 
> illuminati
> you refer to but do not put too much effort into as they are a lost 
> cause
> and therefore not worthy of anything other than being aware of.
> You state that the Magna Carta is one of a group of documents brought 
> about
> to enslave and yet that is the one document that is the foundation of 
> Juries
> and establishes the will of the jury over the will of the King or as we 
> know
> it today the government. 

> The very tyranny you and your movement are against are mortally afraid
> of
> the very documents that you are labeling as part of the enslavement. The
> government are desparetly trying to throw out the Commonwealth 
> Constitution
> Act 1900 as this is their perimeter fence for which they have been 
> keeping
> from us for over 100 years as this document empowers the people it does 
> not
> remove our "uncontrollable authority".
> From what you are writing in my humble opinion you need to know alot 
> more
> about the law in order to achieve your will and as such please come to 
> the
> next CLRG meeting next Tuesday night meeting with a pen and paper. The
> address is 157 High Street Road Ashburton starting at 7.30pm sharp, be 
> there
> or be square.

> Regards
> Darryl
>       


> > peter@peternolan.com wrote:
> > 
> > Darryl,
> > The australian constitution? Only small parts of it.
> > 
> > Why would I read it? It is a document of deceit that does not apply 
> > to

> > me. I wish nothing to do with it and recommend other intelligent men
> do
> > the same.
> > 
> > I have read and studied the US CON-stitution in great detail as well
> as
> > many analyses by many people on the deceptions in it.
> > 
> > Now. I am polite enough to answer your question directly.
> > 
> > Please be so polite as to answer my direct questions.
> > 
> > If not. You can expect that I will report such on my crimes against
> > fathers site.
> > 
> > Your site claims your group supports common law. The basis of common
> law
> > is the jury trial. You are being asked a very simple question. I am
> > doing that to see if it might be sensible to ask if you and members of 

> > your group are willing to serve on the new juries we are creating 
> > and
> > put ALL people properly accused of a crime who deny the crime on trial 

> > for the accusers who wish it.
> > 
> > We have 55 or so fathers willing to sit on these new juries in these
> new
> > courts. Our hit rate seems to be about 1 in 1000 men. Maybe 1 in 500
> of
> > late.
> > 
> > I am extremely well versed on the Illuminati and their methods of
> > deception. And ALL the famous documents like the magna carta, bill of 
> > rights 1688, and constitutions are documents of deceit and 
> enslavement.
> > 
> > That includes the bible and the koran and the tumuld as well.
> > 
> > If you do not know the illuminati has been in charge ince sumeria it
> is
> > difficult to believe they wrote all these documents of enslavement.
> > 
> > Now. Are you going to answer my very simple and straight forward
> > questions or not?
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > 
> > Sent from BlackBerryR from Vodafone
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Darryl O'Bryan" <darryloflife@optusnet.com.au>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:44:10
> > To: <peter@peternolan.com>
> > Subject: Re: RE: RE: Notice of My Will
> > 
> > Peter
> > Have you read the Constitution?
> > 
> > Darryl
> > 
> > 
> > > Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Darryl,
> > > 
> > > Do you realize that "discriminating" means to be able to tell the
> > > difference
> > > in quality of items. As in "a man of discriminating taste"? So I
> > > discriminate all the time. I discriminate between good beer and bad 
> > > beer.
> > > Good wine and bad wine. Good food and bad food. Good people and bad 
> > > people.
> > > Men and women.
> > > 
> > > It is only for those who do not realize that "discrimination" as 
> > > it
> is
> > 
> > > used
> > > today is a psyop of the Illuminati who tend to use it as a "bad"
> > thing.
> > > It
> > > seems that you are either not aware of the Illuminati and how they
> > > operate
> > > or that you are a willing agent.
> > > 
> > > Now. The Australian CON-stitution.
> > > 
> > > It is a LIE. A TOTAL LIE.
> > > 
> > > Do you know who "We the People" are? They are the SIGNATORIES and
> > their
> > > heirs. THAT IS IT.
> > > 
> > > The CON-stitution is a document of enslavement for the ignorant 
> > > and
> > > stupid.
> > > It does NOT apply to the people who live on the land. It ONLY 
> applies
> > to
> > > those who consent for it to apply to them.
> > > 
> > > Now. I notice that you did not answer any of my very simple
> questions.
> > 
> > > 
> > > You completely avoided the topic. So here they are again.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Please explain how
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > "There is no such thing as constitutional rights" for people. 
> > > > Only

> > > > persons
> > > > participate in constitutions. And they don't have rights, they
> have
> > > > privileges."
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Shows no understanding of the Australian Constitution.
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Here is another question for you.
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Can you show me the contract that was signed by the leaders of 
> > > > all

> > > 200+
> > > > originie nations that existed in Australia in 1770 that shows 
> > > > they

> > > > entered
> > > > into a binding contract with the british to sell the continent 
> > > > to
> > > them?
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > If not? Can you please show me the contract that establishes the
> > > british
> > > > as
> > > > the LAWFUL owners of the land known as Australia?
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > So. You have a site that pushes the constitution. You have written 
> > > a

> > LOT
> > > on
> > > it. Surely you can answer these simple questions. Show me the 
> > > signed contracts where the orginies handed over their land to the 
> > > british.
> > > 
> > > If you can't show me this the constitution is NULL AND VOID 
> > > because
> > the
> > > british have no claim to the land. NONE AT ALL. And that means no
> > claim
> > > to
> > > create a constitution for the people who live on it.
> > > 
> > > You have been taking in by a LIE Darryl. The question is, are you
> > going
> > > to
> > > take the blue pill and believe the lie or are you going to take 
> > > the
> > red
> > > pill
> > > and wake up to the truth.
> > > 
> > > Its your life. Makes no difference to me if you stay ignorant.
> > > 
> > > Best Regards
> > > 
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
> > > Sent: 19 September 2011 12:11
> > > To: peter@peternolan.com
> > > Subject: Re: RE: Notice of My Will
> > > 
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > Your right to your opinion is bound by the instinctive and the 
> > > Constitutional. We the people have taken ownership of our
> Constitution
> > 
> > > 46
> > > times throughout the last 100 years.
> > > The difference between a "person " and the thought energy being 
> > > inhabiting
> > > your flesh and blood is one bound by consent. According to the 
> > > Constitution
> > > we are innocent until proven guilty and that is the world inhabited 
> by
> > 
> > > the
> > > thought being inhabiting the flesh and blood.
> > > The "Person" was created by a criminal cabal who are despairingly 
> > trying
> > > to
> > > disconnect and demolish our written and consented Constitution. I 
> > > am not saying for one moment that our Constitution is perfect but
> it
> > 
> > > is
> > > the only law apart from Switzerland that gives the flesh and blood
> > > thought
> > > being a controlling voice in bringing about a law.
> > > The fact that we have never fully implemented that portion of the 
> law
> > is
> > > explained through our IGNORANCE of the law. We would not be in the
> > mess
> > > we
> > > are in now if we all understood our Constitutional obligation to
> know
> > > that
> > > the Constitution is there to keep Government in line.
> > > Yes that's right it is our job to understand the Constitution so 
> > > we
> > can
> > > keep
> > > our SERVANTS in line.
> > > Our rights are in the words of the Constitutional debates
> > > "UNCONTROLLABLE".
> > > 
> > > Oh by the way the Constitution does not discriminate and embraces
> all
> > > races
> > > including the natives, so why are you discriminating?
> > > 
> > > Darryl
New Post
 5/21/2012 8:49 AM
 

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------

> From: CLRG Mailing List <news@clrg.info>

> Date: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:34 AM

> Subject: [CLRG News] Notice of My Will

> To: news@clrg.info

>

>

> TO all people on this list please activate your rights through the

> Commonwealth Constitution and print out the attached Notice, sign it and

> take it into your Federal Sitting members office and insist that it be

> presented to him or her for immediate attention.

>

> Regards

> Darryl O'Bryan

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:50 AM
 

> Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> wrote:

>

> To Darryl O'Bryan,

>

> There is no such thing as constitutional rights" for people. Only

> persons

> participate in constitutions. And they don't have rights, they have

> privileges.

>

>

> Have you read the book on how men can live free in fem-nazi Australia?

> Have

> you taken oath to sit on the new juries we are creating?

>

>

> http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/1/t

> hre

> adid/538/scope/posts/Default.aspx

>

>

> If not? Why not?

>

>

> ALL federal politicians are criminals.

>

>

> We are going to put them ALL on trial.

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:50 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 18 September 2011 06:24
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Re: FW: Notice of My Will


Peter


According to who, have we no Constitutional rights?

And I suppose the supposition that a person is a non entity is justification for putting aside laws handed down through trial and error over Thousands of years as your excuse for running out of control.

You have clearly stated here that you do not understand the Constitution or the fact that the People are the masters and those in government are the slaves. Well I suggest you read the first three words in the opening paragraph to the preamble to the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900.

Before you throw out the baby with the bath water understand the law of the land before taking on a doctrine that ignores our Constitutional rights for your own sake and the sake of people you manage to influence.

Or just put your head back in the sand and pretend like this never happened.


Darryl

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:51 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 18 September 2011 15:52
To: peter@peternolan.com; info@clrg.info
Subject: RE: Notice of My Will


Hi Darryl,

I saw a response from you on my blackberry but when I went to download it some hours later to my email it was mysteriously gone.

 

I do know ASIO are watching my emails.

 

So I do not have a copy of that email. You may resend it.

 

In my brief look over it at breakfast I believe you claimed that I had shown no understanding of the constitution.

 

Please explain how

 

“There is no such thing as constitutional rights” for people. Only persons participate in constitutions. And they don’t have rights, they have privileges.”

 

Shows no understanding of the Australian Constitution.

 

Here is another question for you.

 

Can you show me the contract that was signed by the leaders of all 200+ originie nations that existed in Australia in 1770 that shows they entered into a binding contract with the british to sell the continent to them?

 

If not? Can you please show me the contract that establishes the british as the LAWFUL owners of the land known as Australia?

 

I think not, right?

 

The Australian Constitution, no matter WHAT ELSE IT IS, is null and void because the LAWFUL OWNERS OF AUSTRALIA DO NOT RECOGNISE IT.

 

It is going to come as a great surprise to many people that they do NOT own the land they bought or the houses they bought or the companies they built.

 

So. I believe you made some comment like “stick your head in the sand”.

 

Unless you can show how the Commonwealth of Australia LAWFULLY has ANY JURISDICTION AT ALL OVER PEOPLE ON THE LAND CALLED AUSTRALIA then it is your good self that has his head in the sand.

 

You might want to wake up.

 

I sent you are link to the book. It is the book that frees all men who live in Australia should they choose to live in freedom.

 

They will need to treaty with the Originies as well.

 

I just gave you some of the most valuable information of your life and you call me names?

 

Why is that?

 

Lastly. I asked you four simple questions.

 

“Have you read the book on how men can live free in fem-nazi Australia? Have you taken oath to sit on the new juries we are creating?

If not? Why not?”

 

You didn’t answer ANY of them. Preferring to try and talk some ignorant rubbish from what I recall.

 

Why?

 

And I will point out. The behaviour you exhibit is typical behaviour of Illuminati stooges set up to lead people astray. Illuminati stooges ALWAYS avoid answering direct questions and ALWAYS play the man and attempt to discredit him. And they ALWAYS feign anger and upset.

 

If you are NOT an Illuminati stooge? You are well advised to not act like one. Just answer direct questions with short and direct answers. If you choose to. If you choose not to? That’s fine too. But it does nothing for your credibility.

 

Best Regards

 

Peter 

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:51 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 19 September 2011 14:11
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Re: RE: Notice of My Will


Peter


Your right to your opinion is bound by the instinctive and the Constitutional. We the people have taken ownership of our Constitution 46 times throughout the last 100 years.

The difference between a "person " and the thought energy being inhabiting your flesh and blood is one bound by consent. According to the Constitution we are innocent until proven guilty and that is the world inhabited by the thought being inhabiting the flesh and blood.

The "Person" was created by a criminal cabal who are despairingly trying to disconnect and demolish our written and consented Constitution.

I am not saying for one moment that our Constitution is perfect but it is the only law apart from Switzerland that gives the flesh and blood thought being a controlling voice in bringing about a law.

The fact that we have never fully implemented that portion of the law is explained through our IGNORANCE of the law. We would not be in the mess we are in now if we all understood our Constitutional obligation to know that the Constitution is there to keep Government in line.

Yes that's right it is our job to understand the Constitution so we can keep our SERVANTS in line.

Our rights are in the words of the Constitutional debates "UNCONTROLLABLE".


Oh by the way the Constitution does not discriminate and embraces all races including the natives, so why are you discriminating?


Darryl 

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:52 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 20 September 2011 13:33
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: Notice of My Will


Peter


The Commonwealth Constitution is your best friend if you read it and understand it. What we do is help you understand it and in doing so you are then able to bring about your wishes to start a jury trial against the perverter's of justice.

I have nothing to do with any organisation influencing the people of this country other through the rule of law also known as the Law of the Land. I do not support or am part of your illuminati. I am aware of the illuminati you refer to but do not put too much effort into as they are a lost cause and therefore not worthy of anything other than being aware of.

You state that the Magna Carta is one of a group of documents brought about to enslave and yet that is the one document that is the foundation of Juries and establishes the will of the jury over the will of the King or as we know it today the government.


The very tyranny you and your movement are against are mortally afraid of the very documents that you are labeling as part of the enslavement. The government are desparetly trying to throw out the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 as this is their perimeter fence for which they have been keeping from us for over 100 years as this document empowers the people it does not remove our "uncontrollable authority".

From what you are writing in my humble opinion you need to know alot more about the law in order to achieve your will and as such please come to the next CLRG meeting next Tuesday night meeting with a pen and paper. The address is 157 High Street Road Ashburton starting at 7.30pm sharp, be there or be square.


Regards

Darryl

New Post
 5/21/2012 8:52 AM
 



-----Original Message-----
From: Darryl O'Bryan [mailto:darryloflife@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 20 September 2011 15:19
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: Notice of My Will


Peter

You need to read what I write and not get caught up in ego.

I have answered all of your questions but your ego keeps getting in the way .


The Commonwealth Constitution does not discriminate between any races read the first three words in the introductory passages which for those of you who have not read the document is called the preamble.

Peter I started my course of action by being part of a group that annexed all of Australia's national estate from the Crown in 1992 this action was acknowledged by the head of the Commonwealth and they wished us well. They had seven years to contest the annexation and failed to do so. Caledonia is the lawful name of Australia according to the Trust.

Please you have admitted you have not read the Constitution so for your own good and those you influence please do so with a proper knowledge of what you are talking about.

I do not confess to knowing everything there is to know about the law but I am learning and able to distinguish between Common sense and control.

So why did you run from this country?


Darryl



> Peter Nolan <peter@peternolan.com> wrote:

>

> Darryl,

>

> " From what you are writing in my humble opinion you need to know alot

> more

> about the law in order to achieve your will and as such please come to

> the

> next CLRG meeting next Tuesday night meeting with a pen and paper. The

> address is 157 High Street Road Ashburton starting at 7.30pm sharp, be

> there

> or be square. "

>

> 1. I do not live in Australia any more and never will again.

> 2. You claim I need to know a lot more but you can't answer the simplest

> of

> questions about the constitution as in where is the contract with the

> originies.

>

> Does that not strike you as odd?

>

> If not? Why not.

>

> It is clear to me that I know MUCH more about this than you.

>

> And in your ignorance you seem not to be able to accept that.

>

> You might like to look over my lawful notices to all the criminals in

> parliament.

>

> http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/97/

> sco

> pe/threads/Default.aspx

>

> We already have enough men to do what I am proposing to do. It just that

> if

> we have more things will change more quickly. Fewer men will die. Fewer

> kids

> will be left fatherless.

>

> Would you like to stop men dying? About 80 per week. Would you like to

> stop

> more kids being left fatherless?

>

> Or do you just want to pretend you know something about the law for your

> own

> ego trip?

>

> These are very simple questions Darryl. Not hard to answer at all.

>

> Are you going to answer my questions? I answered yours.

>

> Best Regards

>

> Peter

Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneric Parent ForumGeneric Parent ForumMen of whom I a...Men of whom I a...Darryl ODarryl O'Bryan