You are here:   Cases
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Cases

Minimize
 
ForumForum South Australi... South Australi...South Australia Parent ForumSouth Australia Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA483 Darrell Foote vs Ken OBrianMBA-LS-AA483 Darrell Foote vs Ken OBrian
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 7/1/2013 5:28 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 6/30/2013 1:22:24 PM

Link to global case registry.

MBA-LS-AA483 Darrell Foote vs Ken OBrian

This is a case that has just been opened. Darrell of the Foote family has been kidnapped and unlawfully incarcerated by one Ken O'Brian as follows. I am preparing the Lawful Notice to send to Ken now. It will be posted in a little while.

Lawful Notice to:
The man calling himself Ken O’Brian also calling himself MR. KEN O’BRIEN
Manager
James Nash House
140 Hilltop Drive
OAKDEN SA 5086
Australia

Phone:08 8266 9600

Fax:08 8266 9601
 LN2013070101 Notice to Ken OBrian V0.01.SP.pdf
 LN2013070101 Notice to Ken OBrian V0.1.pdf
 A01_Fax_of_Authorisataion.pdf
New Post
 7/1/2013 10:30 AM
 
And here is the confirmation the fax has been sent.

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 01 July 2013 00:31
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Lawful Notice to Ken O'Brian


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 5 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-06-30 22:31:04 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 485 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:11 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 7/16/2013 3:12:22 PM
This fax was sent though on July 6th 2013.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 06 July 2013 01:40
To: '61882669601@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention of Ken O'Brien and staff of James Nash House.


Dear Sir/Madam,
please pass this fax to Darrell of the family Foote.

Hi Darrell,

I have been sent two 9 page faxes today from persons unknown but from the JNH fax machine. They detail the orders etc for your unlawful incarceration. I recommend you present this fax to Ken O’Brien and to anyone else there that you come across in response to those faxes.


Attention of Ken O’Brien and staff of James Nash House.

Darrell of the Foote Family is my client and has claimed the protection of the Law via the agency of the Mens Business Association. The Mens Business Association operates in two jurisdictions of law, Natural Law and Common Law. The Mens Business Association does not recognise the legislation of corporations masquerading as countries such as “The Commonwealth of Australia”. We do not consent to be subject to that legislation. Therefore the contents of the faxes sent to me are not relevant to this case because the legislation in question does not apply to Darrell.

We are offering Darrell of the family Foote the benefit of the protection of the law. We will protect our members rights exactly as the people who call themselves politicians for “The Commonwealth of Australia” carry out their crimes against us. That means we reserve the right to use force up to and including deadly force just exactly like every person in Australia who pays taxes is supporting and condoning the use of deadly force against innocent people in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.

If you pay taxes in Australia you are supporting and paying for the use of deadly force against innocent people in a war for oil and drugs. You are subject to the law of nature whether you agree or not. That law can best be expressed as “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. Since you pay taxes and support killing innocent people using deadly force you can have no comment to make about the Mens Business Association reservation of our right to defend ourselves with force up to and including deadly force.

We are peaceful men. We wish merely to be left alone by the criminal cartels of governments, police, medical fraternity and legal fraternity. However, since you will not leave us alone we reserve the right to use the same level of force to defend ourselves as the criminals in government use to carry out their crimes. And governments carry out their crimes using deadly force.

Now. I recommend you think very seriously about your position. You are holding a man against his will with no lawful basis. That a criminal who calls himself a “psychiatrist” makes the false claim that Darrell is “mentally ill” does not give anyone any right to unlawfully incarcerate him. This is the same thing the communists did in Russia and China and it was not lawful then either.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. You, Ken, and every staff member at James Nash House will be subject to the rule of law and you will be held accountable for your crimes. We will first offer you the protection of the Common Law if you consent to be subject to the Common Law. If you do not consent to be subject to the Common Law then you WILL be subject to Natural Law since you are a part of nature. I strongly recommend that you consent to be subject to Common Law so as to have the protection of the Common Law.

Now. Let me give you a quote that is very appropriate at the moment. You can go to the source document and read it for yourself if you doubt my rendering of it.

http://freedom-school.com/person/pers...

This is from Cruden vs Neale in North Carolina in 1796 over the question of being subject to the legislation of a government.

“When a change of government takes place, from monarchical to a republican government, the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any reengagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their nature state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent.” CRUDEN v NEALE 2 NC. 338 (1796)

Let me repeat the most important piece for all staff at James Nash House.

“He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent.”

Darrell of the family Foote has told you that he does not consent to this unlawful incarceration and NO POWER ON EARTH can lawfully detain a man who does not consent to that detention. All such detention against non consent is UNLAWFUL.

Now. Again. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. All staff at James Nash House are accomplices in the crime of the UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION of my client, Darrell of the family Foote. If you do not make remedy to him to his satisfaction you will be put on trial before a jury of your peers and you will, inevitably, be found guilty. The jury of your peers will determine what remedy you will be offered to make.

Should you not consent to make that remedy you will be outlawed, meaning the protection of the law will be withdrawn from you as you did not consent to make remedy for your crimes. If you choose to have the protection of the law withdrawn from you then you may not interact with any other law abiding person as any person who gives aid to an outlaw is committing the crime of aiding and abetting a known criminal.

You will be banished from your society. You can choose to go into a jail voluntarily and pay for your upkeep or take your chances as an outlaw.

Now. I have very strongly recommended that you apologise to Darrell, beg forgiveness, make a remedy that he is satisfied with and release him immediately. You have chosen not to do that. You are bringing yourself into conflict with me and the Mens Business Association.

I recommend you cease and desist bringing yourself into conflict with me because it is a conflict that you will lose.

We have set up the protection services of our members in such a way that it is not possible for anyone to defend themselves against us. This was done because it was clear from the beginning that the criminals in the government will make efforts to defend themselves using the criminal cartel called “police”. So we have made sure that the criminals called “police” are not able to interfere with our protection of our members.

As I said. I very strongly recommend you release Darrell immediately offering him a remedy that is commensurate with your crime of unlawfully incarcerating him that is acceptable to him.


Best Regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
aka Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
Founder
Mens Business Association

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:14 AM
 
This is the receipt.

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 06 July 2013 01:44
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention of Ken O'Brien and staff of James Nash House.


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 4 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-07-05 23:43:37 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 187 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:15 AM
 
This fax was sent through on July 9th.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 09 July 2013 00:57
To: '61882669601@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention of Ken O'Brien and staff of James Nash House.


Dear Sir/Madam,
please pass one copy of this fax to Darrell of the family Foote and one copy to the criminal who calls himself Ken O’Brien.


Darrell and Ken,

I have received the following email from a friend of Darrells.

“He was wondering if it would be possible for you to accept a phone call from him in approx 17 to 18 hours time which will be at 11:45am Adelaide time where Darrell will be in a Guardianship Board meeting. It is to do with the fax Darrell sent to you late Thursday or early Friday.

The doctors are attempting to force Darrell to receive another anti-psychotic injection and also are attempting to extend Darrell's incarceration by 12 months.”

My home number is +xxxxxxxxxxx. My Cell number is: +xxxxxxxxxxxxx. Should someone text a number to call in to this meeting to my cell I can call directly into a phone in this discussion.

My client, Darrell of the Foote Family has made it perfectly clear to you, Ken, that he does not consent to your criminal acts against him. Your criminal acts against Darrell have now been forwarded to more than 400+ people on my personal email list and more than 400+ people who are politicians and media people in Australia. That the politicians and media people are trying to ignore the fact that you are acting like a communist or nazi thug is very damning evidence against them.

As I noted to you the other day. Darrell is not subject to the legislation you are using to unlawfully incarcerate him. I even took the time to point you to a more than 200 year old reference that makes it very clear no man is subject to the institutions of any other men save by his consent. If you bothered to read the Magna Carta, the document that limits the actions of the government in Australia, you will see that no one can be incarcerated by the government of Australia lawfully save by a decision of a jury of his peers or the due process of LAW. And legislation is not law. That the Australian government regularly does so demonstrates the criminality of the government, not the lawfulness of unlawful incarceration.

The question that will arise at this meeting is whether you will immediately release Darrell and agree to stand trial before a jury of your peers. After all? If you have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, you will welcome standing trial before a jury of your peers, right? Innocent men have nothing to hide and nothing to fear, right?

If you choose to continue to commit crimes against Darrell the question that is begged is what to do with you next. I will give you, by this letter, fair notice that should you or any staff under your orders inject Darrell with anything, no matter what you claim it to be, then I shall have to give very serious consideration to declaring such act an act of WAR. As you will be well aware, should anyone commit an act of WAR and have been well warned that such an act may well be considered an act of WAR then it is up to the person that issued the warning to make the decision as to whether a state of WAR will be claimed into existence.

I, personally, do not wish to claim into existence a state of WAR in Australia as we have claimed into existence in Ireland. When wars are declared people get killed. I have laboured for more then 5.5 years so as to be able to end the WAR that is being prosecuted by the Australian government against the Australian people peacefully.  Unlike in Ireland, in Australia I have insisted that no violent act takes place until all possible avenues of peaceful settlement have been fully explored and those who wage WAR on us have remained intransigent and un-repentant. Given that all federal members have remains intransigent and unrepentant more than 2 years after their crimes being made public you can see how hard we have worked to give the criminals in government service every chance to cease and desist in their crimes.

However, since all federal and state members are very want to prosecute this WAR and not want to cease and desist their acts of WAR there may soon come a time when such a decision needs to be made. Despite harassment from ASIO, the Federal Police, State Police and many others, we are making all efforts to bring a peaceful ending to this WAR via the avenue of open, fair and just courts using the jury trial process.

Right now, since I advised you to cease and desist your crimes, you have no further injured Darrell except for the unlawful incarceration. I am willing to grant you the protection of the common law should you be willing to choose to be subject to the common law by way of consenting to a jury trial of your peers.  I am offering you, personally, a peaceful way to remedy your crimes. I give you fair warning that should you choose to cause Darrell more injury, harm and loss by way of any form of forced medication, especially injection, the choice of claiming this to be an act of WAR against Darrell, and therefore the MBA, and claiming into existence a state of WAR will fall solely to me. I do not need to discuss that decision with anyone.

Should events go down that path then Darrell will become a prisoner of WAR. Any subsequent injection will make you guilty of the same sorts of war crimes as were carried out in Nazi Germany by the likes of Joseph Mengler and his comrades. You will become liable to dispensation of summary justice, specifically meaning execution without trial. A second injection under your orders and you will waive any jury trial you might wish to subsequently claim. The penalty for war crimes and experimental medication against prisoners of war, where due warning has been given, will be summary execution.

Should my decision be to claim into existence a state of WAR and claim you and other staff at James Nash House to be enemy combatants the only acceptable offer for peace on your part, and the part of your staff, will be unconditional surrender. This will mean you will forfeit all property to Darrell and you will be branded a WAR criminal for having been the aggressor in creating the conflict.

I would also take this opportunity to remind you that by committing an act of WAR those who do so also bring their immediate families, wives, husbands and children, on to the field of battle. Modern conflict includes the family. This precedent was set with World War II and the bombing by the allies of residential communities in Germany. For example,  the state of WAR claimed into existence in Ireland includes the wives, husbands and children of the enemy combatants and they are also declared lawful targets of opportunity for anyone who wishes to wage the WAR that has been claimed into existence.

We have all the time in the world to dispense summary justice against those who commit acts of WAR, Ken. It does not need to be today. It does not need to be tomorrow. It can be next year, the year after that.  We can wait until no one is interested in you, no one is watching you, no one is bothering with you, or the wives, husband and children of your staff. We will act when we choose to act. There is no one in Australia who can interfere with our due process of law and dispensation of Justice. This is one reason why we have been so patient. We know what we are able to do, so we are giving peaceful resolution every chance.

Unfortunately, criminals just like you, seem to believe they can commit crimes with impunity and so criminals like you are aggressively exacerbating the situation.  Indeed, your politicians have prepared for a civil war and are trying very, very hard to start a civil war. If they do start such a civil war and you are one of our enemy combatants? Your personal chances of survival will be zero. Where do you imagine you can run and hide?

It is in your best interest and the best interests of your staff, their wives, husbands and families, for you to choose to consent to be subject to the common law and consent to a jury trial of your peers. As I said. If you feel you are innocent and have nothing to hide, you will welcome a jury trial of your peers.

If you do not welcome a jury trial of your peers and you commit what may well be considered an act of WAR after such clear and unequivocal warning? Then I will presume this is a deliberate attempt by you to assist your colleagues in politics provoke violent responses in self defense to your acts of criminal aggression. You will be publicly labelled a WAR criminal who is attempting to provoke and incite violence.

One last thing Ken. I find it very strange that criminals like you are so arrogant as to think the police will protect you from Justice. The police are not there to protect you. They are there to protect the interests of the upper echelons of the Illuminati. You, by your position, will not be deemed worthy of protection should a state of WAR be claimed into existence. You might want to think about how low you are in their hierarchy, how disposable you are, and what that means to you personally.

You may willingly serve them today by performing acts of crime and violence against men like Darrell and imagine they will protect you. But I can assure you of two things.

  1. They can’t protect you or your family.
  2. They don’t want to protect you or your family.

 

If you had been dealing with the Illuminati as long as I have? You would never have agreed to be their minion. I was offered a job almost immediately I opposed them more than 5 years ago. A very good job Ken. I said no because I know they kill those who are “insiders” who have outlived their usefulness so as to not allow them to talk and embarrass them like Edward Snowden is currently doing.

So. We shall see if you have grown some common sense, or at least grown a reasonable measure of self preservation, by the time of this meeting. Ok?

Again. My recommendation is that you agree to be subject to the Common Law so as to avail of the protection of the Common Law. Ignorance of the Law, meaning the Common Law and Natural Law, is no excuse in a court of Law Ken, no matter what those who are lying to you say.

Best Regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
aka Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
Founder
Mens Business Association

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:16 AM
 
This is the receipt for the fax.

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 09 July 2013 01:03
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention of Ken O'Brien and staff of James Nash House. 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 5 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-07-08 23:02:50 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 244 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:18 AM
 
This was sent on July 10th to Darrell of the foote family.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 10 July 2013 03:46
To: '61882669601@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention to Darrell of the Foote Family


Dear Sir/Madam,

Please pass this fax to Darrell of the Foote Family.

Hi Darrell,

I waited by the phone until 5:30am my time. My cell rang twice. Once there was no one there, once only an elderly lady saying hello but seemed to not hear me.

Firstly. All aspects of the meeting are null and void. There has been no paperwork presented to me that they have any right to hold you. Since they have no right to hold you then they have no right to hold the meeting regardless of what they say. Further, their document refers to “legal rights”. There is no such thing as a “legal right”. This is a lie and all such claims are rejected. They do not get to tell you what “rights” you have. You have now formally claimed your rights and they stand as claimed as of July 3rd. So right now your rights are properly claimed. When there is no objection these rights will be retrospective to your birth, meaning past the beginning of your incarceration.  

As your re-presentative at law they have an obligation to send to me any rebuttal of your claim of right. Silence is consent. So for them to remain silent is to consent to your claim of right.

Your claim of right says this:

“Furthermore, I claim that I may not be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, without full disclosure and fixed terms and conditions atop my signature knowingly and consciously made by my hand.”

You have not signed a contract to avail of the services of the mental health profession of SA knowingly and consciously with your own hand. If they claim that you have done this then the burden of proof is on them to produce the contract that you signed immediately on request. And I hereby demand the presentation of that contract as your re-presentative.

This claim of right will now be with Quentin Bryce, Kevin Rudd and Mark Dreyfus. We have the precedent that my such claim of right has not been queried let alone challenged in more than 4.5 years now. You can tell your captors that this statement on this claim of right is now with these three people. If they are unable to rebut this claim of right inside 30 days, which they are not able to do, then your claim of right is retrospective to your birth and everything I have said about them being in VERY big trouble will stand as true in a court of law.

Also. You might want to quote this to them. Magna Carta 1215. Clauses 39 and 40.

“(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

 

(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”

Next you can quote this speech by Robert McClelland when he was Attorney General.

Robert McClelland, February 20th 2009.

“As many of you will know, the Australian Government, through a committee of eminent Australians, is currently consulting the people of Australia on the recognition and protection of human rights. With limited exceptions, our Constitution does not recognise individual rights, freedoms or guarantees. In Kruger v Commonwealth (1997)[1] Dawson J said: "Those who framed the Australian Constitution accepted the view that individual rights were on the whole best left to the protection of the common law and the supremacy of Parliament. Thus, the Constitution deals, almost without exception, with the structure and relationship of government rather than with individual rights."”

Common Law in this sense is the derivation of the Magna Carta and the King, meaning the government, is strictly prohibited from causing injury, harm and loss except by lawful judgment of a mans peers or by the law of the land, meaning, the Common Law. Since those who are unlawfully incarcerating you are using legislation to do this they are not using “the law of the land”.

Now. These people say they are specialists in psychiatry which has been proven many times over to be a bogus science. Well? I am an expert in Law, the real law and not these bogus statutes and legislation masquerading as law. These people are subject to the rule of natural law and are offered the protection of the common law only so long as they agree to consent to the common law. If they refuse to consent to the common law, they waive it’s protection.

Now. I would ask you to advise Ken O’Brien that he has been handed FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH INFORMATION such that he can have no defence at all of the accusation of unlawfully kidnapping you. Therefore, unless Ken O’Brien says otherwise in writing to me over his signature, I will presume he is a criminal agent of the Illuminati whose job it is to provoke violence and cause division in the community by committing crimes and pretending like he does not know he is committing crimes. There is no possible way Ken O’Brien can read my correspondence and not know he is committing crimes. I am quoting from the Magna Carta and the Attorney General. These are the authoritative sources for law for the legal entity called “The Commonwealth of Australia”.

I recommend you let your captors know that there is nowhere to run and nowhere to hide. They will be brought to justice. They are being offered the opportunity to avail of the common law as mentioned by Robert McClelland in the speech quoted. But the MBA has the power to strip them of that protection via a jury trial of their peers. As the Magna Carta says, once a man or woman is subject to a lawful judgment by a jury of their peers then men can be sent against a guilty party. The Magna Carta also makes specific provision for “or by the law of the land”.

One of the laws of the land is the law of WAR. Once a line is drawn in the sand, such as further injections for you, as the trigger for a state of WAR to possibly be claimed into effect, then men can be sent against those who are defined as enemy combatants by the due process of the law of the land.

Your friend reported this to me:

“It seems that the decision of the Guardianship Board is to hold Darrell for 12 months, and to start using drug injections.”

I would ask you to re-iterate to Ken O’Brien that you have lawful re-presentation who has provided phone, fax and email addresses and that those who are unlawfully incarcerating you have an OBLIGATION AT LAW to present their proof of claim that they are lawfully incarcerating you on demand by me.

Failure to do so has established their knowing guilt of their crimes already. For only guilty people will not present their proof of claim when it is demanded by a LAWFUL re-presentative.

Again I note that my email, and phone and fax numbers are below.

I would ask you to please re-iterate to Ken O’Brien that any further injection may well be considered an act of WAR. Two further injections may well be consider the act of war crimes for which the penalty is summary execution without the benefit of a jury trial.

Lastly? If Ken O’Brien has any questions in his mind as to my ability to do what I say I can do? Please suggest to Ken that he call Kevin Rudd or Julia Gillard and ask them why it is that they have not killed me long before now. Both Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard have information at hand as to why they have absolutely forbidden any harm to come to me personally. This information was deliberately left where ASIO could find it.

Perhaps Ken would like to call Kevin of Julia and ask why it is that when they have many trained assassins at hand they have not despatched one to kill me. You might like to tell Ken that if he has not got the guts to make that call and ask why I am not dead? He might want to take me seriously. Because it seems at the moment his is not taking me nearly as seriously as Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard are taking me.

Best Regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
aka Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
Founder
Mens Business Association

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:18 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 10 July 2013 03:51
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention to Darrell of the Foote Family


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 4 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-07-10 01:50:55 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 198 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 7/17/2013 9:20 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 7/16/2013 3:21:46 PM
This fax was sent through on 15th July 2013.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 15 July 2013 23:10
To: '61882669601@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention The man calling himself Ken O'Brien

Dear Sir/Madam,

please pass this fax to the man calling himself Ken O’Brien.

Dear Ken,

Today I am in receipt of a fax from my client Darrell of the family Foote. This fax claims to be “Level 2 – Community Treatment Order”.

It has a logo of the South Australian Government. It claims to be from an organisation called “Guardianship Board”. I am sure that if you talk to my client he will be able to show you the document he faxed to me.

You have a very serious problem with the document Ken. It says, and let me quote exactly.

“In relation to DARRELL FOOTE (“the Person”) the Board has reviewed the Level 1 Community Treatment Order dated 11 June 2013 and was satisfied that:

a. the Person has a mental illness; and
b Because of the mental illness, the person requires treatment for the Person’s own protection from harm (including harm involved in the continuation or deterioration of the Person’s condition) or for the protection of others from harm; and
c There are facilities and services available for appropriate treatment of the illness: and
d there is no less restrictive means than a community treatment order of ensuring appropriate treatment of the Person’s illness.”


Now. You may say, “what is the problem with this order”. Well, Ken, the problem with this order is that it is an order against DARRELL FOOTE the capital-P-Person. Here is the definition of a P-erson.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/person

 

per·son n.

  1. A living human. Often used in combination: chairperson; spokesperson; salesperson.
  2. An individual of specified character: a person of importance.
  3. The composite of characteristics that make up an individual personality; the self.
  4. The living body of a human: searched the prisoner's person.
  5. Physique and general appearance.
  6. Law A human or organization with legal rights and duties.
  7. Christianity Any of the three separate individualities of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as distinguished from the essence of the Godhead that unites them.
  8. Grammar
    1. Any of three groups of pronoun forms with corresponding verb inflections that distinguish the speaker (first person), the individual addressed (second person), and the individual or thing spoken of (third person).
    2. Any of the different forms or inflections expressing these distinctions.
  9. A character or role, as in a play; a guise: "Well, in her person, I say I will not have you" (Shakespeare).

 

This looks pretty harmless, right? Wrong. Re-read number 6.

 

“6. Law A human or organization with legal rights and duties.”

 

That is correct. In LAW a “Person” is a human OR an ORGANISATION with legal rights and duties. You can find this definition and what it means in my second book called “The Truth Be Told” which is available on the downloads page for from of The Mens Business Association. www.mensbusinessassociation.com.

Your Order is against the LEGAL ENTITY OF THE PERSON CALLED DARRELL FOOTE and is NOT AGAINST THE MAN WHO CALLES HIMSELF DARRELL OF THE FOOT FAMILY.

In the English language a word that is a noun has a small letter for the first letter. So the word “lake” is a noun for a lake. But in the term Lake Berley Griffin the word “Lake” is part of the PROPER NOUN of “LAKE Berley Griffin”. The use of the CAPITAL P in this document that is written in the language called LEGALESE AND NOT ENGLISH the word “Person” with a CAPITAL P is a PROPER NOUN and refers to the LEGAL ENTITY MR. DARRELL FOOTE and is NOT the NOUN “person” of the English language which may or may not refer to the man calling himself Darrell of the family Foote.

You may claim to know psychiatry Ken, but I know English, I know Legalese, and I know THE LAW. And you, my friend, are in the most trouble you have ever been in for your entire life because we WILL apply your standard of “ignorance of the law is no excuse”.

Further. In this document it says, and I will quote exactly,

“The Board Orders”

And the stamp of the Board is affixed to the “Order”. This is NOT like an “ORDER” in the Army. This is like an “Order” at McDonalds. When you walk in to McDonalds you ORDER your big mac meal. But BEFORE you get your meal you have to pay. Further, McDonalds is under NO OBLIGATION to full fill your order if they do not believe you are an appropriate customer. For example, if you walk into a McDonalds naked they may refuse to fulfil your order. If you walk in with a syringe and threaten to inject the server if they do not comply with your request (order) for a big mac meal then they might refuse to fill your request (order).

My client, Darrell of the family Foote irrefutably denies any willingness to fulfil the request (order) of the Guardian Board and by this fax you are being informed of his absolutely irrefutable unwillingness to fulfil the request (order) of the Guardian Board. Your current efforts to use brutality, force, violence and coercion to get Darrell to accept this request (order) is an extremely serious crime for which you are about to be put on trial.

I hereby inform you that I discussed Darrells situation with him last night and sought his agreement to the next steps of prosecuting you and your staff as the criminals you are.

 

We shall:

  1. Inform all federal and state politicians we can of your crimes.
  2. Inform as many people in the Australian, especially Adelaide community, as we can of your crimes.
  3. Inform the most senior members of the Adelaide Police Force of your crimes as we can.
  4. Inform as many members of James Nash House staff and others who come to James Nash House of your crimes as we can.
  5. Locate the home addresses of as many James Nash Staff as we can and post those home addresses to our Crimes Against Fathers Site.
  6. Find the names of as many James Nash Staff as we can and denounce them as criminals on our Crimes Against Fathers Site.
  7. Open up case registry entries for as many James Nash Staff as we can positively identify on our Crimes Against Fathers Site..
  8. Publish the faxes that have been sent to you and note to the public that you have refused to answer my questions as the re-presentative of Darrell of the Foote family. In short, we will tell the public that you have flatly refused to provide any proof of your claims when challenged to do so thereby admitting under law that you have no such valid claim.
  9. Immediately begin the process of empanelling a jury to put you on trial in the public.
    All such documentation will be posted to our MBALawServices You Tube Channel. A Channel that Eric Schmidt knows to leave alone. Not even ASIO can get a video taken down from there.

 

You will obviously be found guilty of your crimes against Darrell of the family Foote.

Darrell tells me he has been injected in his time under your unlawful incarceration. This is an act of WAR. One that you WILLINGLY chose to commit against my strong recommendation to the contrary as far as I am aware.  

I am going to consider the question as to declare you an enemy combatant who has chosen to commit an act of WAR against an innocent man you are holding as a prisoner of WAR. Naturally we shall do all we can to find your home address and publish it so that those in the community know where a man who commits an aggressive act of WAR lives so as to avoid him, for their own protection, of course.

Again. I inform you and warn you that a second injection may very well be considered a WAR CRIME. If you allow Darrell of the Family Foote to be injected again I will have to give very strong consideration as to whether the protection of the law will be IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN FROM YOU. Whether this happens or not we will progress to the Jury Trial Phase with all possible haste.

You have been asked to provide proof of the claims you are making and you have chosen not to. It is my presumption that you know exactly what you are doing, that you know you are a criminal, that you are under instruction to create conflict by inflicting harm on innocent people and committing acts of WAR against innocent men. You have, to date, chosen to remain silent against these presumptions thereby you are lawfully accepting these presumptions.

Lastly, Ken. You should be aware of the Milgram experiments. Certainly I was taught about these back in 1984 when I studied Psychology. Stanley Milgram proved that about 60% of middle class Americans in the north east region of the US would inflict pain, up to and including death, on a subject if they were told to do so by someone whom that person regarded as an “authority”, namely an actor in a white coat pretending to be a doctor.

The moral to the experiments is that we must AT NO TIME consider ANYONE who works for the government an “authority”. We must, AT ALL TIMES, consider those who work for the government to be exactly what they are, PUBLIC SERVANTS. Naturally, at no time can a SERVANT order the MASTER to do anything and at no time can the SERVANT take on the responsibilities of the MASTER without the explicit consent of the MASTER.

You, Ken, are a PUBLIC SERVANT. Darrell of the Foote family is your MASTER as he is a member of the public. You have absolutely no authority over him. Those people who did the Milgram experiment were told by the actor wearing a white coat pretending to be a doctor “I take responsibility for anything that happens”. About 60% of people will KILL ANOTHER human being if they think they are not responsible for the human beings death. This is why I am making it very clear to you that you are PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for your actions as is every staff member at James Nash House. “I was following orders” was dismissed as an insufficient defense at the Nuremberg Trials.

Now. We shall make all haste to denounce you as the criminal you are as broadly as we can. We will make all haste to put you on trial in a public jury trial that will be published on You Tube. Whether you begin to co-operate with us or not is really up to you. But your actions will be read into the record for the men on the jury to consider. If you remain intransigent? The men on the jury will take that into consideration.

 
Best Regards

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
aka Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
Founder
Mens Business Association

 A05_Fax_2013_07_15_01.pdf
New Post
 8/15/2013 2:17 PM
 
The attached fax was sent through to notice all staff at James Nash House on 2nd August 2013.

Receipt to follow.
 LN2013080201 Notice to Staff at JNH V0.1.pdf
New Post
 8/15/2013 2:18 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 02 August 2013 04:41
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention All Staff and Contractors Serving James Nash House


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 1 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-08-02 02:40:55 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 125 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 8/15/2013 2:20 PM
 
This fax was sent through to attention all staff at James Nash House on 2013-08-15. Receipt to follow.
 LN2013081501 Notice to Staff at JNH V0.1.SP.pdf
New Post
 8/15/2013 2:28 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 15 August 2013 05:19
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention All Staff and Contractors Serving James Nash House


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 2 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-08-15 03:18:51 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 158 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 9/2/2013 3:37 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 01 September 2013 18:37
To: 'Kate.Ellis.MP@aph.gov.au'
Subject: The unlawful incarceration of Darrel of the family Foote


Hi Kate,

as the federal member for the Adelaide area I want to make sure it is brought to your attention that my client Darrell of the family Foote is still unlawfully incarcerated in James Nash House. This soviet/nazi style unlawful arrest and incarceration as well as injection of substances unknown has been announced to as many members of parliament as I can find. And yet you people are electioneering rather than dealing with these crimes!

What sort of monsters are you people?

Here is the link again. This email will be put on it so that the people of Adelaide know that you support and condone unlawful arrest and incarcerations as well as injection of substances unknown.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9
Welcome Page
Video Page
Downloads
IBI Store
LinkedIn

-----Original Message-----
From: Ellis, Kate (MP) [mailto:Kate.Ellis.MP@aph.gov.au]
Sent: 30 August 2013 06:50
To: Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
Subject: Thank you for your email.

 

Thank you for your email. I value the views of my community so that I can fight for the things that Adelaide needs.

An election has been announced for Saturday 7 September 2013 and I ask for your support so I can keep fighting for real results for Adelaide. Our community deserves a government that has a positive plan: to grow our economy, deliver better services and create jobs.

www.kateellis.com.au will show you the government’s positive announcements, posted throughout the campaign.

If your issue is urgent, please call 82692433.

If you need help with voting, please contact me on 82692433 so that we can help you with a postal vote, give you information about how to vote early, or tell you about mobile polling.

If you live outside of the Adelaide electorate, go to http://www.alp.org.au/ for more details of Labor’s positive plan for the country and information about your local candidate.

Kind Regards

Kate Ellis

Federal Member for Adelaide

 

Delivering Real Results for Adelaide

 

Authorised by Kate Ellis, 161 Main North Road, NAILSWORTH SA 5083

 

 

 

New Post
 9/2/2013 3:43 AM
 



New Post
 9/8/2013 6:58 AM
 
I put this up on the liberal parties facebook.


New Post
 12/18/2013 12:54 PM
 
Tony Abbott has been in office 100 days now....so I put this on his facebook.


New Post
 12/23/2013 2:11 PM
 
 Modified By host  on 12/22/2013 9:12:34 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 23 December 2013 04:48
To: '61882669601@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention All Staff and Contractors Serving James Nash House


Attention All Staff and Contractors Serving James Nash House,

This fax is to inform you that all staff members and all contractors and suppliers to James Nash House are now publicly declared enemy combatants. You are now LAWFULLY subject to ACTS OF WAR as are all members of your families. By engaging in WAR CRIMES you have brought your families into a position of danger.

On 2013-11-21 an open letter was sent to as many Australian politicians that we could find the email addresses for. You can find this letter by googling “2013-11-21 Open Letter to Australian Politicians”.

In this letter we have claimed into existence a limited state of conflict. Tony Abbott and his family have been declared enemy combatants.

The letter communicates the list of those who are now declared publicly as enemy combatants. These include but are not limited to:

  • All serving officers at Holden Hill Police Station (war criminals)
  • All serving staff at James Nash House (war criminals)
  • All contractors or suppliers to James Nash House (aiding and abetting war criminals)
  • All brothers, sisters, children, mothers, fathers, wives, husbands and direct inlaws of all of the above.

Any man who declares himself to be a soldier and who commits an ACT OF WAR against you or your family members will be released from any possible subsequent incarceration at the cessation of hostilities.

Any man who declares himself a soldier and commits ACTS OF WAR against you will be accorded the same honour and respect we show for our ANZACS for he will be fighting an evil domestic enemy. You people at James Nash House were well warned to cease and desist your criminal acts against my client Darrell.

Ladies and Gentlemen,
Once again. I recommend you cease and desist in your WAR CRIMES against my client Darrell of the family Foote.

You have my contact details on this email. I can also be contacted at peter@peternolan.com.

Further? I recommend you enjoy your Christmas holidays in relatively good cheer because by this time next year you will be stripped of all your property to make remedy to Darrell for the WAR CRIMES you have committed against him.

For such WAR CRIMES you can expect the most severe of prosecution and a severe remedy instruction to be issued by the jury.

Best Regards

Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
joschua@joschuaboehm.com
Founder
Mens/Womens Business Association
Mens Business Association
Womens Business Association

 

New Post
 12/23/2013 2:12 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 23 December 2013 04:48
To: '61882076110@efaxsend.com'
Subject: Attention All Staff And Officers of Holden Hill Police Station


Attention All Staff And Officers of Holden Hill Police Station


This fax is to inform you that all staff members and officers of Holden Hill Police Station are now publicly declared enemy combatants. You are now LAWFULLY subject to ACTS OF WAR as are all members of your families. By engaging in WAR CRIMES you have brought your families into a position of danger.

On 2013-11-21 an open letter was sent to as many Australian politicians that we could find the email addresses for. You can find this letter by googling “2013-11-21 Open Letter to Australian Politicians”.

In this letter we have claimed into existence a limited state of conflict. Tony Abbott and his family have been declared enemy combatants.

The letter communicates the list of those who are now declared publicly as enemy combatants. These include but are not limited to:

  • All serving officers at Holden Hill Police Station (war criminals)
  • All serving staff at James Nash House (war criminals)
  • All contractors or suppliers to James Nash House (aiding and abetting war criminals)
  • All brothers, sisters, children, mothers, fathers, wives, husbands and direct inlaws of all of the above.

Any man who declares himself to be a soldier and who commits an ACT OF WAR against you or your family members will be released from any possible subsequent incarceration at the cessation of hostilities.

Any man who declares himself a soldier and commits ACTS OF WAR against you will be accorded the same honour and respect we show for our ANZACS for he will be fighting an evil domestic enemy. You people at Holden Hill Police Station were well warned to go to James Nash House and determine why what law Darrell of the Family Foote has been incarcerated and was being held in solitary confinement.

Ladies and Gentlemen,
Once again. I recommend you cease and desist in your WAR CRIMES against my client Darrell of the family Foote.

You have my contact details on this email. I can also be contacted at peter@peternolan.com.

Further? I recommend you enjoy your Christmas holidays in relatively good cheer because by this time next year you will be stripped of all your property to make remedy to Darrell for the WAR CRIMES you have committed against him.

For such WAR CRIMES you can expect the most severe of prosecution and a severe remedy instruction to be issued by the jury.

Best Regards

Joschua-Brandon: Boehm©
joschua@joschuaboehm.com
Founder
Mens/Womens Business Association
Mens Business Association
Womens Business Association

New Post
 12/23/2013 2:16 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 23 December 2013 04:51
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882076110. Re: Attention All Staff And Officers of Holden Hill Police Station


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 2 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882076110 was successfully transmitted at 2013-12-23 03:50:53 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 95 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: +61 8 82076110

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 12/23/2013 2:16 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: send@mail.efax.com [mailto:send@mail.efax.com]
Sent: 23 December 2013 04:53
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Successful transmission to 61882669601. Re: Attention All Staff and Contractors Serving James Nash House


 

eFax

 

 

Dear Peter,


The 2 page fax you sent through eFax to 61882669601 was successfully transmitted at 2013-12-23 03:53:22 (GMT).


The length of transmission was 93 seconds.

The receiving machine's fax ID: 08 8266 9601

If you need additional assistance, please click here to contact us.


Thank you for using the eFax service.


Sincerely,
eFax Customer Service

Home    

Powered by j2

© 2012 j2 Global, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

New Post
 4/8/2014 5:52 AM
 
And here is another post to Abbotts facebook page.

 
New Post
 5/28/2014 10:19 AM
 
Kate Ellis has a twitter account.


https://twitter.com/KateEllisMP/status/471427077128716288

So I posted this on her twitter account. Let's see how long before the "empowered woman" blocks me like she did on her facebook. Women in politics are a joke. They are cowards. They block anyone that presents them with a truth they do not like.

New Post
 7/12/2014 9:03 AM
 
And here is me asking the Today show when they are going to report this war crime against Darrell.

Previous Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForum South Australi... South Australi...South Australia Parent ForumSouth Australia Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA483 Darrell Foote vs Ken OBrianMBA-LS-AA483 Darrell Foote vs Ken OBrian