You are here:   Cases
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Cases

Minimize
 
ForumForumVictoriaVictoriaVictoria Parent ForumVictoria Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA002 Peter Nolan vs Chris MerrettMBA-LS-AA002 Peter Nolan vs Chris Merrett
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 4/8/2013 3:51 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/8/2013 2:09:29 PM
The attachments link to the Affidavit of accusation.

As per usual there is a plain PDF version and a signed and printed version.

The video reading of the Affidavit is here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCp7Fs...

MBA-LS-AA002-V01 Affidavit of Accusation Nolan vs Merrett

Link to Chris Merrett CAF Entry.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...
 LN20130408 - Notice to Chris Merrett V0.1.SP.pdf
 LN20130408 - Notice to Chris Merrett V0.1.pdf
New Post
 4/10/2013 4:04 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/9/2013 10:05:00 AM


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 09 April 2013 19:03
To: 'Chris Merrett'
Subject: Consider yourself serviced in the public domain

Hi Chris,

here is the link to the affidavit of accusation against you that has been put into the public.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

The entire affidavit is read into a video and published. It will be circulated to my list in my next newsletter.

You have until the end of the month to decide how you will respond.

I have set the Proposed Remedy at AUD100,000.

If you attempt to take the matter to the court and lose you will also pay all court costs.

Since you have are alleged to have children? If you can not pay these amount? You might want to get your children to pay your bills for you.

Your children should have been denouncing your antics long ago.

I presume your parents are no longer with us. If they are? They might also loan you the money to get yourself out of the mess you chose to get yourself into.

Best regards

Peter


New Post
 4/15/2013 12:45 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 2:38 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: Still no affidavit from you

Can I expect it some time this side of rapture? You're forever telling people I've been served with it, just like bullshitting about asio going to gary's place. At least tell the truth and serve me with your affidavit of accusation or stand, for the 2nd time in 3 days, a proven, bare faced liar and failed con man.
New Post
 4/15/2013 12:45 AM
 
From: peter@peternolan.com
To: chrismerrett@live.com
CC: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: re: Still no affidavit from you
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 06:07:08 -0700



http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...
New Post
 4/15/2013 12:45 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:12 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

I see a link that I have no obligation under common law to click on and you know it. Nice try newbie. Serve it. Have it delivered to my home physically. Certified mail will do considering no one is prepared to cross the street for you. I'll make that concession but that's it.
New Post
 4/15/2013 12:46 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:44 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

Chris,
The common law is decided by the jury......not by you, not by me.

You can explain to the jury that you think you have no obligation to answer an affidavit put into the public like this.

The jury will decide whether they believe that having spent two years slandering me you were offered the opportunity in the public to respond to my affidavit of accusation.

If you think 12 men will unanimously decide that you have no case to answer then just ignore the accusations.

If you think 12 men will unanimously decide that you have to be given a piece of paper as opposed to being presented the piece of paper electronically? Then feel free to go with that position.

I am very confident that 12 men will unanimously decide that you were properly accused in the public and given every opportunity to defend yourself from my accusations using electronic paper as well as using electronic transmission of my voice being read into evidence.

So you are welcome to refuse to defend yourself on this matter. In which case you will agree and acquiesce to the jury decisions.

Now it's time for you to present your so called "evidence" to the jury and to the public.

Best regards 

Your brother peter
New Post
 4/15/2013 1:15 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:10 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

But Peter! Reality check!!! You don't have 12 Men. What you do have is a high propensity for lying in the face of overwhelming evidence, a total lack of credibilty, a personality disorder, probably Asperger's, and 13 imaginary friends forming your jury and court secretary. You might get Flowers or someone of his ilk, but it seems you couldn't even be bothered setting up a dozen or so email addresses and at least use sock puppets like you usually do. Anonymous Secretary and Jury. LOL! Spare us your delusions you fool.

Hey. You always say (all caps) MEN should be willing to pay for something that's of great value to him? 

What price Illuminatti Ingrid's identity, and all details, 100% verified. What's that worth to you Pedro?
New Post
 4/15/2013 2:12 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:10 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

Hi Chris,
I think you might want to take the reality check yourself.

"The Peoples Courts of Australia" are going to be held in public with jury members and secretaries known and all evidence in the public.

However, as you have seen, the people of Australia do not wish to have a Peoples Court of Australia running. The Peoples Court of Australia was proclaimed into existence on April 15th 2011. So far the people of Australia have not been willing to convene such a court. Hence, the people of Australia have waived any right to any concern that anyone else creates a set of courts that can run cases in Australia. The people ofAustralia have spoken. They are not yet willing to hold criminals accountable for crimes in any significant numbers.

Hence, the Mens Business Association is now convening courts under the jurisdiction of Natural Law and common law. There are enough men to run new courts as long as they do not fear attack in return.

You are invited to participate in the due process of law and to defend yourself against my Affidavit of Accusation. You have the right to defend yourself from my accusation made in the public. However, I have no obligation to wait for you to exercise that right. You have been given plenty of time to create your defense. 

Should you wish to create your defense then you can issue an Affidavit of Replay against each point. You will be required to present evidence to the jury of the statements you have made over the last 2 years. If you are not able or not willing to provide that evidence then the jury will be asked to make a decision based on what you present. 

Now. The Jury will not be anonymous to the secretary or to me. Their names will not be put into the public so as to protect them from men just like you.

Men like you and Chris Roubis have slandered some of those men who have taken the position that they are willing to publicly support the re-introduction of the rule of law into Australia.

Since men like you and Chris Roubis have demonstrated you are quite willing to commit crimes against jury members who make themselves known as being willing to be jury members you can have no complaint when jury members are offered the protection of anonymity from the public. 

If you raise the point that jury members can not be anonymous from the public it will be pointed out that such men are often falsely labelled as paedophiles and sex tourists by the man who is being accused so as to discourage them from jury duty.

The jury will be asked whether they think it is reasonable that their identities be kept anonymous from men who have a track record of falsely labelling men as paedophiles and sex tourists. 

I am confident that all 12 men on the jury will agree that is a reasonable thing to do as long as their identities are known to the Secretary and accuser and as long as all evidence is then presented to the public so that the due process of law can be seen to be done.

The jury will most likely meet electronically unless we can find 12 men who live in relatively close proximity to each other.

The paperwork and paper trail will be complete. The Secretary will make oath to that as will I.

The jury members will be required to identify themselves to me and the secretary and prove their credentials to the secretary and I. 

The jury will then have the opportunity to review all evidence presented. If you choose not to present any evidence then you will be agreeing for the trial to go ahead on an undefended basis.

The public will also have all evidence presented to it and the public can point out to you any item that they believe might indicate your innocence on this matter.

The MBA Law Services do not have to be run to the same standards of disclosure as I propose "The Peoples Courts of Australia" be run. 

If you wanted the Jury members to be public? If you wanted the secretary to be public? It might have been better for you if you did not participate in posting things to a site that also slanders those very men you claim you wish to be in the public, right?

If you wanted a totally transparent trial process? You might have noted to your criminal collaborators that attacking those who come forward to run trial processes should themselves be given the protection of the law you wish for yourself.

This is a case of "do unto others" Chris. You have co-operated and collaborated with people who have hidden their identities to commit crimes against many people. In doing so you have agreed, by the natural law of "do unto others" that you can be criminally victimised by people who are anonymous and hidden from the public. So you can have no complaint that those who are going to judge you lawfully, fairly and justly are anonymous to you.

The natural law is best expressed as "do unto others" Chris. And what you do to others you agree can be done to you. We will not sink so low as you have sunk. We are better than that. We are going to put you on trial. Your claim that you must know who the jury members are will be tested against "do unto others". And you will fail that claim should you raise it.

You are going on trial Chris. You have to weeks to prepared your evidence to present to the jury. Since you have been slandering me for two years? Since I have told you for a long time that I will put you on trial when I am ready? I am sure you would have all your evidence right at hand, right? 

And yes Chris. There are people who wish to cause you injury, harm and loss. If you choose to be outlawed by the MBA Jury? They will not be committing a crime if they cause you injury, harm or loss. There can be no lawful investigation of any such action and we at the MBA will prosecute any police officer or any peace officer who attempts to investigate any such action should such ever come to pass.

Of course, neither of us knows the future, right? You might just agree that you have no evidence, you have no case, and you might just agree to pay the remedy so as to retain the protection of the law. 

You might have proof of all the things you say. You might present it to the jury. You might be found innocent. 

Your fate is in your own hands. You have made many claims about me in the public. 

You are now required to prove the claims you have made to a jury of your peers.

If you can not prove the claims you have made to a jury of your peers they will have no alternative than to find you guilty of slander and causing actual injury harm and loss to me.

They might make the amount larger than AUD100,000, they might make it smaller than AUD100,000. 

The jury will make a unanimous decision on the remedy amount.

Like I said. You are invited. If you don't turn up? You agree to the Jury decision. If you defy the jury you can be outlawed. Those who have concerns that you MIGHT be caused injury, harm or loss once you are an outlaw are perfectly free to create “The Peoples Court of Australia” and put you on trial in an instance of that court.

But, as you see, the people of Australia are not willing to create such a court and provide you with the level of transparency you wish. They have had ample opportunity to create the first instance of such a court. Since they will not do as you wish? I am free to do as I propose.

You have two weeks. I recommend you use your time wisely.

Best regards

Your brother peter 

New Post
 4/15/2013 2:13 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:11 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

"What price Illuminatti Ingrid's identity, and all details, 100% verified. What's that worth to you Pedro?"

It is worth nothing to me. I will find out those details in good time. 

Just by the way? If you actually have those details you are obliged at law to pass them to me.
New Post
 4/15/2013 2:13 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:41 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

This is my last word on the matter Peter. I have been very patient with you but my patience is running out. Don't test me.

Paper affidavit. jury and secretary that exist, and we'll take it from there. I'm being very reasonable. Don't test my patience one more time.

Got It?
New Post
 4/15/2013 2:14 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:55 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: Your voice evidence

Peter, truthfull I can't sit through your youtube recordings listening to your voice. You really are quite nauseating.
New Post
 4/15/2013 2:19 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:19 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

Chris,
you are a criminal slanderer. Your "word on the matter" is not relevant.

You have been publicly accused of committing criminal acts on an affidavit of accusation read into the public under oath and penalty of perjury and full commercial liability.

You can settle this matter for the amount of AUD100,000.

Should you contest the accusations made under oath you can put your evidence into the public where the jury can see it.

The jury will decide your innocence or guilt based on the evidence presented.

If you present no evidence then the matter will proceed on an undefended basis. Just like you condoned and supported in my case with Jennifer if case you missed the fact your condoned and supported that action. 

"Do unto others".

And by the way? All costs of the jury and secretary will be added to the AUD100,000 should you refuse to participate or be found guilty.

If any member of the public has an objection to this jury trial process they are welcome to bring that objection to me in writing in their own name and I will publish the objection and my response.

You have two weeks. I recommend you use that time wisely.

Best regards

Your brother peter
New Post
 4/15/2013 5:27 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: 14 April 2013 17:21
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: RE: Still no affidavit from you

If I had any reason to be concerned about my property or my safety you would be 100% dead as Julius Caeser in the street. LOL Shove your imaginary, asperger's and red wine inspired jury up your arse. Do you understand? LOL ffs/
New Post
 4/15/2013 5:27 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: 14 April 2013 17:53
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: Know Ingrid's Details? LOL!

I spent a lovely afternoon with "Ingrid" today for your information Pedro, LOL! And I don't mean via email the way you thin the world exists. Coffee, walk around the lake, etc etc.. Dick Wad. We knew each other before the cyberworld you live in even existed, You idiot!! Did you think we'd done all this great work on you only knowing each other online? LOL You are a true tard. I note no comment re gary dumping you and you lying flat out about it, your lies are all out there, the latest 100% proveable and availiable to anyone who wants it. Sorry Pero but it's almost over for you

It's been funny watching you descend into total madness though.

Put that on your blog with the rest of it dickhead. rofl
New Post
 4/15/2013 5:28 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: 14 April 2013 18:29
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: thanks

great materiel tonight pedro, give me your paypal and i'll slip a little surprise in there for you. how fair is that?
New Post
 6/3/2013 3:43 AM
 

From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 11:30 AM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: My trial

Peter, I am being told that you are saying you have sent my "default judgement" to me.

Now you and I both know that this isn't true, so when can I expect you to send it?

New Post
 6/3/2013 3:44 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 6:41 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: re: My trial

Chris,
so who is telling you that?

Your case is very public. You can see from the case registry entry where it is up to.

You can't deny that you have been given every opportunity to respond to the Affidavit of Accusation.

You are most welcome to present a rebuttal to the affidavit of accusation.

To rebut it you need to present a point by point rebuttal.

You are welcome to present into the public domain your claimed evidence.

Should you not present such into the public domain then the jury will not have any evidence from you to take in to consideration. 

For every point in the affidavit of accusation you do not provide a rebuttal for the jury must accept that you have accepted that the statement in my affidavit of accusation is true.

You do not get to wait until the trial to present your defense for the first time. 

You have stayed silent long past the date of the opportunity that you have had to present your evidence. Therefore you have already lawfully agreed for the trial to proceed without presenting any evidence in your own defense.

Now...If you wish to alter your current position of going to trial on an undefended basis I would recommend you make a public response one way or another. It is really up to you. "Silence is consent". You know this. You have been very vocal in your slander of me but when challenged on an affidavit of accusation to bring forth your evidence into the public domain you have remained totally silent.

Where is your evidence Chris? The secretary is waiting for you to present it.

The only reason I have not moved forward on your trial is that I am actually pretty busy doing some other more important things.

But you are not forgotten. You are the first cab off the rank for the jury trial process.

So. When you are ready to respond to the affidavit of accusation point by point and when you are ready to put this claimed evidence into the public domain then you are very welcome to do so. ok?

It is "put up or shut up" time for you. And if you shut up? Then you are out AUD100,000.

And if this Wayne Place character really is your son as he claims? What is THAT all about? Getting your own son involved in your crimes and bringing him into danger? Really?

Many people are waiting your response Chris. You have been out on the web telling lies about me as loudly as you can to as many people as you can. Now you are being publicly asked to present your evidence to back up what you have been saying and you have gone all quiet. Hhhmmm?

Best regards 

Your brother peter
New Post
 6/6/2013 3:59 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:34 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: My alleged trial

So, no link to the progress of my alleged trial? i guess that's because it doesn't exist. Have you heard Jens news? You will soon fat man. LOL

New Post
 6/6/2013 4:00 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:59 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: re: My alleged trial

Chris,
the link to your case is here.

All correspondence is being posted there for the public to see. 

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

You are doing well with 603 views.

I have very little concern what Jennifer and my former family are doing. 

They are criminals and I shall have nothing to do with them.

Jennifer will be put on trial in the near future.

The most disgraceful part is that ALL those people around her know that she is a criminal and was convicted out of her own mouth and yet they demonstrate such a level of man hatred that they support a criminal woman over an honest man.

Living in Germany I experience no such hatred Chris. I am treated with the respect I have earned across my lifetime.

Indeed, Germans are most shocked when I tell them my story.

Jennifer will be impoverished soon enough. She will be impoverished or dead. 

I have no concern or personal interest in which result she chooses for herself. 

How she will finish is her choice. I believe in freedom of choice.

Best regards 

Your brother peter 
New Post
 6/6/2013 5:52 AM
 
From: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:55 PM
To: "peter nolan." <peter@peternolan.com>
Subject: RE: My alleged trial

So, as I expected, nothing at all apart from an exchange between you and I. Is that my alleged trial? LOL!!
New Post
 6/6/2013 6:01 AM
 
From: "peter@peternolan.com" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:00 PM
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: RE: My alleged trial

Hi Chris,
your current situation is that your trial would be very short since you have not responded to the Affidavit of Accusation that I have ample evidence you are aware of.

The secretary is giving you some extra time to respond just because he is a nice guy.

In the absence of any response he will convene a jury and your case will be heard undefended.

You have been given every opportunity to present your response. You can turn up on the day and argue whatever you like. But you will not be able to present evidence that has not been previously presented to the secretary. What you see on TV is not how real courts operate Chris. 

The due process of law is to present an affidavit of accusation and give the accused party the opportunity to respond. Failure to respond is consent to the accusations presented.

Do you imagine that you have some big dramatic "court scene" coming up?

The jury will be empanelled. They will be on line and not in one room. And they will review the evidence that is available to them and available to the public. 

If you present no such evidence? Then they will make their decisions absent any such evidence.

You do not get to be any sort of "dramatic actor" in this process Chris.

You get to present your evidence on affidavits under oath. You are welcome to dictate it into a video and post it to you tube.

I shall talk to the secretary again and see if he is still keen to give you more time. 

If it was my decision I would have closed out your opportunity to respond by now.

Best regards 

Your brother peter 
New Post
 4/8/2014 6:05 AM
 
Gents,
the trial date set for this trial is 2014-04-27.

It will be held as an internet meeting with the jury members granted anonymity. 

All documentation and testimony will be presented to the public so that any concerned people may review the process to ensure that a fair and just jury trial took place and that the verdict was beyond any reasonable doubt.

All proceedings will be recorded and posted to the You Tube channel.

If you wish to observe the jury trial live in progress please write to peter@peternolan.com to make sure you can get a place in the internet meeting.
New Post
 4/24/2014 10:40 AM
 
This is the signed and dated notice that was delivered to Chris Merrett notifying him of the case to proceed.
 LN20140422 - Notice to Chris Merrett V1.0.SP.pdf
New Post
 4/24/2014 10:41 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 21 April 2014 03:47
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc


Gents,
this went to Chris Merrett today.

The case file is here.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

If your circumstances change and you can not make 11am next Sunday please let me know at your earliest convenience.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan


New Post
 4/24/2014 10:42 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 21 April 2014 22:35
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Cc: 'Chris Merrett'
Subject: FW: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc


Gents,

There is a little confusion over how we are proposing to run the Jury Trial on Sunday and that is understandable.

This is the first time we are doing this via the MBA and so it is only natural for there to be some confusion.

The first secretary for the MBA is a Swiss man I have known for 6 years now. We met in 2008 on a forum and we have become friends because he, as a Swiss man, has a similar outlook on life as far as living in freedom goes. His English is reasonable. He is copied on this email.

The order of proceeding will be as follows:

 

We will create an internet meeting via one of the standard internet meeting services. I am not sure which one we will decide on yet. Perhaps Webex, netviewer or similar. In any case the meeting will be created on line via one of the standard meeting services.

As part of that there will be a call in number that all people can call in to. You can call in via a regular telephone or a via skype. The call in number will be a local country number so there should be little or no cost to call in to that number.

You will be able to type into the Message box of the netmeeting software if you do not want your voice recorded on the conference call.

The entire affidavit of accusation will be read into the record on the day. A number of you have suggested you will view the video or read the affidavit beforehand. Although you are welcome to do this it is not necessary. You will be able to follow along on the day.

This is the case entry on CAF.  It has the full video you might like to view but it is not necessary to view it. That is for public consumption so that anyone who is wondering what this case is about can go and watch it.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...


Please make sure you have downloaded this PDF. Please confirm to me you have this PDF. This is the PDF that you will need to read along with on the day. If you have any trouble downloading the PDF I can email it to you directly.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/L...

On the day I will re-read this PDF into the public record of the court. You will have the opportunity to ask any question you like of me on the day. It is your job to decide for yourself if this evidence convinces you that Chris Merrett has been slandering me for three years. As you can see in the PDF Chris Merrett has been willing to post his own photograph on the sites that have been slandering me and others.

By posting his own photograph and by emailing me in his own name as well as doing videos on You Tube that have now been taken down Chris Merrett has given you a lot of evidence that he has been slandering me and he has never denied that he has been slandering me. His email is chrismerrett@live.com but I do not expect any of your to email him directly because he is just as likely to slander you too.

Once I have read my evidence into the record as testimony it will be Chris Merretts turn to read his Affidavit of Response in to the record.

All my points are numbered. As a matter of law any point that Chris Merrett does not rebut you must consider as true at law. That means each of the items number Item 01 to Item 20 muse be rebutted one item at a time. Any item, 1 through 20, that is not rebutted you must, as a matter of law, consider true. Since you can see screen shots of the comments that Chris Merrett has been making and he has frequently used his own photograph it is up to you to determine for yourself if you think that Chris Merrett has been slandering me beyond any reasonable doubt.

You may ask Chris Merrett any questions you like during his presentation of his written affidavit of response. He will be under oath and penalty of perjury for all that he says.

At the end of the presentation of the two Affidavits you can ask any further questions you like until you, personally, are satisfied beyond any reasonable doubt as to whether you think Chris Merrett is innocent or guilty.

If the 12 of you who are empanelled on the Jury decide he is guilty then your next step will be to discuss among yourselves what you think is the suitable payment that Chris Merrett must make to me so as to remedy what will then be the proven crime of slander for three years. I have suggested the amount of AUD100,000 as fair and reasonable.

The jury may vary the amount up or down.

You will make the offer of remedy. If Chris Merrett voluntarily meets the offer of remedy then that is the end of the case. If he chooses to defy the decision of 12 of his peers then I will ask for a writ of outlawry and a writ of execution.

The writ of outlawry is for all 12 jury members to agree that they will withdraw the protection of the law from Chris Merrett. This would mean that no crime can be committed against him as he would be an outlaw.

The writ of execution is for all 12 jury members to agree that I can hire peace officers who can be armed to go to Chris Merretts place of residence and seize his property. It will also mean that I can place liens against his property and go to his bank and attempt to seize his property via the mechanisms of his bank with the ability to accuse any who stand in my way as being in contempt of court and obstructing the path of justice.

It also means I can issue orders to the local police to support this writ of execution and to prosecute them if they do not do as ordered.

A writ of execution is a very serious item indeed and the jury must decide unanimously that they are willing to agree to issue such a writ.

As you can see, Chris Merrett is copied on this email and this email will also be posted to the case registry entry so that it is in the public.

Some members are concerned that their PC might not be fast enough. In which case you will be able to join the call via a normal land line telephone but if you want to ask a question your voice will be recorded and published as part of the court record. For those who are concerned about their PC not being fast enough we will be testing skype this week to see if being in a skype group is supported on your PC.

To keep people anonymous we will create skype userids for the jury members and witnesses who wish to remain anonymous. This will be a backup for the meeting software that we use for the jury trials.

If you have any questions please return them to me and I will answer to all.

The most common question is “how do you plan to enforce any remedy instruction”.

The answer is there is no such thing as “enforcement of law” any more than there is a santa claus or easter bunny. The lie of “law enforcement” is very commonly believed by adults just as the lie of santa claus and the eastern bunny is believed by children.

There is only the PROTECTION of the law. And you will decide if you are willing to withdraw the protection of the law from Chris Merrett if he refuses to make the remedy that he is offered. If the PROTECTION of the law is withdrawn what happens to Chris Merrett after that point in time is none of your business and none of anyone elses business. Chris Merrett would be an “outlaw” and he can be lawfully killed just like any other outlaw like “Ned Kelly” etc. That is how outlawry works.

You may NOT use force to incarcerate a man LAWFULLY. If Chris Merrett decides that he does not want to take his chances as an OUTLAW then he will be welcome to VOLUNTARILY put himself into a jail for his own protection. Of course, all his property will be seized while he is in jail, auctioned off, and my remedy paid as well as costs.

All efforts will be made to seize Chris Merretts property PEACEFULLY so that no one gets hurt. But our MBA Peace Officers or even regular police officers are armed and by being armed they are making clear that the use of deadly force is an option. If the use of deadly force was not an option they would not be armed.

So if Chris Merrett decides to defy the unanimous decision of the jury then he is agreeing to waive the protection of the law and live under the natural law of do unto others as you would have them do unto you. And “thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour” is on the same list as “thou shalt not kill”.

It is 100% Chris Merretts choice whether he waives the protection of the law or not. It is your choice to decide if you will make him a fair and reasonable remedy offer to remain a part of his community. 

I hope this makes things a little clearer for all.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
New Post
 4/24/2014 10:42 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 24 April 2014 01:20
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Cc: 'Chris Merrett'
Subject: FW: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc


Dear All,

Chris Merrett has been issued the signed and stamped notice of case to proceed today 24th of April.

Can each of you please send me a mobile number that I can reach you on in case there are any troubles on Sunday?

If you do not have a mobile number can you please give me the phone number of where you will be at 11am Sydney time on Sunday?

Thanks and Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
New Post
 4/26/2014 6:12 AM
 
So Chris Merrett is being defiant to the very end.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 24 April 2014 04:02
To: peter nolan.
Subject: RE: My alleged forthcoming trial


Greetings Pedro.  

Here is my alleged defence. Everything I've ever said about you is true. You're a fat woman beating child abusing dead beat peddo and failed conman who can't get over the butthurt of Jen tossing you out for being a fat cunt.

And you also sodomize big dogs and dwarves. 

So my defence is this. I admit saying all these alleged things about you. And will continue to alert the world regarding the facts about Peter Andrew Alleged Nolan and am justified in doing so because it's all true. 

So shove that up your fat ranga peddo arse you obese, bi-polar cunt. 

Love Chris xxox

New Post
 4/26/2014 8:39 AM
 
So I wrote him this reply.

From: "Peter Nolan" <peter@peternolan.com>
Sent: 24 April 2014 16:38
To: "Chris Merrett" <chrismerrett@live.com>
Subject: Re: My alleged forthcoming trial

Hi Chris,
Then feel free to put these comments on an affidavit and bring the evidence if your claims to the jury on sunday.

Absent any evidence of your statements you will be found guilty of slander.

When you make a claim you can be called upon to prove it.

Best regards

Peter

New Post
 4/27/2014 10:19 AM
 
Seem Chris Merrett is starting to be very worried about what he has gotten himself in to. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 00:16
To: peter nolan.
Subject: The Jury


Hi Pedro,

I'd just like to thank you for including me as a jury member at my own trial. Expect a lengthy deliberation. When you lie some more and say the verdict is in your final destruction will enter it's final phase. 
You could have avoided the trouble you are in by just being truthful but you aren't able to be truthful. So you are now stuck with your ruined excuse for a life. Dickwad. 

Apologise, pay your child support and beg Jen's forgiveness for abusing and stalking her. 

Best regards 

Your sister Chris. 

New Post
 4/27/2014 10:20 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/26/2014 4:20:44 PM
And I sent him this response.

-----Original Message-----
From: peter@peternolan.com [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 00:23
To: Chris Merrett
Cc: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: re: The Jury

LOL! Chris.

You are starting to get worried now aren't you. 

Remember. Any agent who attempts to get on the jury is committing perjury and will be punished for it.

Since the jury deliberations will be recorded it will be easy to tell if a jury member is an agent.

Since you did not deliver an affidavit of response you have admitted your guilt.

The only things for the jury to deliberate are:

1. Does the evidence prove, beyond reasonable doubt, you slandered me, including causing my removal from a contract.
2. What should be the fee for the remedy.

And then, should you choose not to pay the fee for the remedy and claim you are going to defy a jury of your peers, will you be outlawed and all that means.

And yes...this too will be posted to your thread where people can see it.

You have lied about me for more than three years.

And today you are going to face the jury of your peers who will judge you and determine your remedy options,

You get to choose your fate. Remedy your crimes or be outlawed.

Best Regards 

Your brother peter 
New Post
 4/27/2014 10:24 AM
 
Yep...this looks like a man who is worried to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 01:18
To: peter nolan.
Subject: RE: The Jury

Worried? LOL !! This is the best thing that could have happened. Dickhead I have you now. Let's get this show on the road. I may even have a personal representative to "appear" on my behalf. 
Should be good. I'm too busy to bother with your online wankfest, so my "colleagues" will be appearing on my behalf.

Enjoy.

New Post
 4/27/2014 10:34 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/26/2014 4:34:55 PM
And so I sent him this response.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 01:34
To: 'Chris Merrett'
Subject: RE: The Jury

Well Chris,
since you would need to lodge your affidavit of response with the secretary yesterday in order to have someone else re-present you it does not matter if someone else is sent along to the conference call. There is no affidavit of response.

Given you have had more than a year to prepare your response no man on the jury is going to agree that you have not had enough time to bring forth your evidence of your claims.

You have no chance of avoiding a guilty verdict, in my opinion. All the men who have read my affidavit of accusation have responded pretty harshly at the idea of calling a man a paedophile in Australia based on no evidence at all.

They put themselves in that position and say “how would I like it if I were called a paedophile by some nut case based on no evidence at all and he created web sites about me and tried to damage my business? Not happy, that is how I would feel”.

There is only one man on the prospective jury I do not know personally or who has not come to us with good credentials that are public.

We have 16 men who say they are ready to go so we can lose 4 in the word taking or oath making and still proceed with the default of 12. You will be charged for their time if they find you guilty and I expect they will want their money, they will have earned it.

Your days of committing the crime of slander against me have brought you to this place.

I recommend that you pay up because I do have the ability to have you killed so as to seize your property on the event of your death.

I am pretty sure no one will defy my taking your property if you happen to be dead.

What? Is your alleged son, a man who is obviously a coward if you even do have a son, going to put his life on the line to retain your property?

Or would he rather simply say “Dad was an idiot and I have plenty of time to earn my own money”?

If I were him I know what I would say. I would say you were an idiot to pick a fight with someone you did not even know and did not even have a bone to fight over with. You are about the dumbest man I know Chris. You had no reason to slander me. And you picked a fight with a man who was always going to defeat you.

You can take your defeat like a man. Or you can fight to your death. It makes no difference to me. Remember? I live in Germany. A much nicer place to live than Australia because men like you do not exist here in Germany. You would have been run out of your own town if you attempted this sort of slander in Germany. 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
New Post
 4/27/2014 3:44 PM
 
Note that chris merrett has been sending emails during the trial process.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 03:49
To: peter nolan.
Subject: RE: The Jury


Sorry Pedro, only had a quick flick through that email,, more of the same, utter bullcrap. All you've done in all this time is talk shit, con dumb people out of their cash and made a total mockery of yourself,

Yo would have wondered why I jumped on you and made your life hell all this time. Well I'll tell you. Because it was fun enraging you. And it was also a whole lot of fun watching you chase someone called Chris Merrett. It's not my name dummy. You have been played fatty.
So go ahead, run your fantasy trial and use your jury and court secretary who don't exist in your invalid court that doesn't exist putting a person on trial that doesn't exist either. I think it's apt that you are trying a non entity. It gives Chris Merrett the same reality as your jury and trial. Zero. You have targeted a person who does not exist and wasted years of your time in the process.

That was the aim from the start and being the dumb fuck that you are you fell for it. LOL!!

Have fun this arvo, I'm going fishing.

New Post
 4/27/2014 3:44 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 04:37
To: peter nolan.
Subject: RE: The Jury


Great. Like I said it's appropriate that a non existent trial with a non existent jury should try a non existent person. I and my colleagues have wasted 3 years of your excuse for a life. That was the aim from the outset and I succeeded. You lose fat man. LOL


From: peter@peternolan.com
To: chrismerrett@live.com
Subject: RE: The Jury
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 19:32:09 -0700

we have the jury trial up and running.

New Post
 4/27/2014 3:48 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 04:41
To: peter nolan.
Subject: RE: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc


lol!!!!!!!

 


From: peter@peternolan.com
To: peter@peternolan.com
CC: chrismerrett@live.com
Subject: FW: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:35:15 +0200

Gents,

There is a little confusion over how we are proposing to run the Jury Trial on Sunday and that is understandable.

This is the first time we are doing this via the MBA and so it is only natural for there to be some confusion.

The first secretary for the MBA is a Swiss man I have known for 6 years now. We met in 2008 on a forum and we have become friends because he, as a Swiss man, has a similar outlook on life as far as living in freedom goes. His English is reasonable. He is copied on this email.

The order of proceeding will be as follows:

 

We will create an internet meeting via one of the standard internet meeting services. I am not sure which one we will decide on yet. Perhaps Webex, netviewer or similar. In any case the meeting will be created on line via one of the standard meeting services.

As part of that there will be a call in number that all people can call in to. You can call in via a regular telephone or a via skype. The call in number will be a local country number so there should be little or no cost to call in to that number.

You will be able to type into the Message box of the netmeeting software if you do not want your voice recorded on the conference call.

The entire affidavit of accusation will be read into the record on the day. A number of you have suggested you will view the video or read the affidavit beforehand. Although you are welcome to do this it is not necessary. You will be able to follow along on the day.

This is the case entry on CAF.  It has the full video you might like to view but it is not necessary to view it. That is for public consumption so that anyone who is wondering what this case is about can go and watch it.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...


Please make sure you have downloaded this PDF. Please confirm to me you have this PDF. This is the PDF that you will need to read along with on the day. If you have any trouble downloading the PDF I can email it to you directly.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/L...

On the day I will re-read this PDF into the public record of the court. You will have the opportunity to ask any question you like of me on the day. It is your job to decide for yourself if this evidence convinces you that Chris Merrett has been slandering me for three years. As you can see in the PDF Chris Merrett has been willing to post his own photograph on the sites that have been slandering me and others.

By posting his own photograph and by emailing me in his own name as well as doing videos on You Tube that have now been taken down Chris Merrett has given you a lot of evidence that he has been slandering me and he has never denied that he has been slandering me. His email is chrismerrett@live.com but I do not expect any of your to email him directly because he is just as likely to slander you too.

Once I have read my evidence into the record as testimony it will be Chris Merretts turn to read his Affidavit of Response in to the record.

All my points are numbered. As a matter of law any point that Chris Merrett does not rebut you must consider as true at law. That means each of the items number Item 01 to Item 20 muse be rebutted one item at a time. Any item, 1 through 20, that is not rebutted you must, as a matter of law, consider true. Since you can see screen shots of the comments that Chris Merrett has been making and he has frequently used his own photograph it is up to you to determine for yourself if you think that Chris Merrett has been slandering me beyond any reasonable doubt.

You may ask Chris Merrett any questions you like during his presentation of his written affidavit of response. He will be under oath and penalty of perjury for all that he says.

At the end of the presentation of the two Affidavits you can ask any further questions you like until you, personally, are satisfied beyond any reasonable doubt as to whether you think Chris Merrett is innocent or guilty.

If the 12 of you who are empanelled on the Jury decide he is guilty then your next step will be to discuss among yourselves what you think is the suitable payment that Chris Merrett must make to me so as to remedy what will then be the proven crime of slander for three years. I have suggested the amount of AUD100,000 as fair and reasonable.

The jury may vary the amount up or down.

You will make the offer of remedy. If Chris Merrett voluntarily meets the offer of remedy then that is the end of the case. If he chooses to defy the decision of 12 of his peers then I will ask for a writ of outlawry and a writ of execution.

The writ of outlawry is for all 12 jury members to agree that they will withdraw the protection of the law from Chris Merrett. This would mean that no crime can be committed against him as he would be an outlaw.

The writ of execution is for all 12 jury members to agree that I can hire peace officers who can be armed to go to Chris Merretts place of residence and seize his property. It will also mean that I can place liens against his property and go to his bank and attempt to seize his property via the mechanisms of his bank with the ability to accuse any who stand in my way as being in contempt of court and obstructing the path of justice.

It also means I can issue orders to the local police to support this writ of execution and to prosecute them if they do not do as ordered.

A writ of execution is a very serious item indeed and the jury must decide unanimously that they are willing to agree to issue such a writ.

As you can see, Chris Merrett is copied on this email and this email will also be posted to the case registry entry so that it is in the public.

Some members are concerned that their PC might not be fast enough. In which case you will be able to join the call via a normal land line telephone but if you want to ask a question your voice will be recorded and published as part of the court record. For those who are concerned about their PC not being fast enough we will be testing skype this week to see if being in a skype group is supported on your PC.

To keep people anonymous we will create skype userids for the jury members and witnesses who wish to remain anonymous. This will be a backup for the meeting software that we use for the jury trials.

If you have any questions please return them to me and I will answer to all.

The most common question is “how do you plan to enforce any remedy instruction”.

The answer is there is no such thing as “enforcement of law” any more than there is a santa claus or easter bunny. The lie of “law enforcement” is very commonly believed by adults just as the lie of santa claus and the eastern bunny is believed by children.

There is only the PROTECTION of the law. And you will decide if you are willing to withdraw the protection of the law from Chris Merrett if he refuses to make the remedy that he is offered. If the PROTECTION of the law is withdrawn what happens to Chris Merrett after that point in time is none of your business and none of anyone elses business. Chris Merrett would be an “outlaw” and he can be lawfully killed just like any other outlaw like “Ned Kelly” etc. That is how outlawry works.

You may NOT use force to incarcerate a man LAWFULLY. If Chris Merrett decides that he does not want to take his chances as an OUTLAW then he will be welcome to VOLUNTARILY put himself into a jail for his own protection. Of course, all his property will be seized while he is in jail, auctioned off, and my remedy paid as well as costs.

All efforts will be made to seize Chris Merretts property PEACEFULLY so that no one gets hurt. But our MBA Peace Officers or even regular police officers are armed and by being armed they are making clear that the use of deadly force is an option. If the use of deadly force was not an option they would not be armed.

So if Chris Merrett decides to defy the unanimous decision of the jury then he is agreeing to waive the protection of the law and live under the natural law of do unto others as you would have them do unto you. And “thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour” is on the same list as “thou shalt not kill”.

It is 100% Chris Merretts choice whether he waives the protection of the law or not. It is your choice to decide if you will make him a fair and reasonable remedy offer to remain a part of his community. 

I hope this makes things a little clearer for all.

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9
Welcome Page
Video Page
Downloads
IBI Store
LinkedIn

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 21 April 2014 03:47
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc

 

Gents,
this went to Chris Merrett today.

The case file is here.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...


If your circumstances change and you can not make 11am next Sunday please let me know at your earliest convenience.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9
Welcome Page
Video Page
Downloads
IBI Store
LinkedIn

 

New Post
 4/27/2014 3:49 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 06:48
To: 'Chris Merrett'
Subject: RE: MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS003 - Notice of Case to Proceed V0.1.doc


The secretary was blind copied. You were openly copied so that all jury members could see you were copied.

One of the questions that I was asked is if I was certain you knew the date and time for the jury trial.

I showed them the emails that show you knew when it was.

Thanks for that!

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
peter.nolan@instantbi.com
skype: peternolan9
Welcome Page
Video Page
Downloads
IBI Store
LinkedIn

New Post
 4/28/2014 7:36 PM
 
This attachment is the procedure being followed for the jury trial.

The Jury Trial was 20 minutes late getting started on Sunday 27th due to one jury member forgetting the start time and having to drive back to his house to join in.

The Jury deliberated the evidence and determined that an adjournment was needed for a number of jury members to review the evidence in more detail and to consider the question of damages in more detail.

The jury will reconvene at a date and time yet to be determined.
 MBA-LS-AA002 - FLS004 - Procedure for the Jury Trial V0.1.pdf
New Post
 4/28/2014 8:18 PM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 27 April 2014 09:45
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: Further Evidence on the slander of Chris Merrett of myself (and others)


Gentlemen,

Jury member 0019 asked me to point out more solid evidence tying Chris Merrett to the image in the affidavit and on the web sites.

This is Chris Merretts YT channel. You can clearly see his photo on the channel

http://www.youtube.com/user/drouin410

If you go to all activities you will find this.
“Chris Merrett replied to a comment from peternolan1109

Hey Peter, how much does Fav#1 charge for a handjob? LOL”

Peternolan1109 was my YT channel that was deleted by YT,

The woman he is talking about, my fav#1 as I call her online, is the woman who helped me save my life when I was suicidal.

He has since taken down his videos where he liked to slander me and call me names in those videos.

I was also asked during the deliberations if there were sites still online slandering me with Chris Merrett being identified.

For those of you who want to check out some links? You might want to click on these.

This was one that linked his online videos that he used to have on his channel. As you can see the people at “antibogan” do not like chris merrett much.
http://theantibogan.wordpress.com/201...
http://theantibogan.wordpress.com/201...
https://theantibogan.wordpress.com/ta...


http://www.quora.com/Chris-Merrett-Mbe
http://www.quora.com/Chris-Da-Aussie-...
https://plus.google.com/+ChrisMerrett...
https://plus.google.com/1127584786588...
http://vk.com/id170324856
http://peterandrewnolan.com/exclusive...


http://www.datingpsychos.com/psycho/1...

First Name

: Chris

Last Name

: Merrett Mbe

Gender

: Male

Age

: 56

Occupation

: Liar and criminal slanderer

City

: Woods Point

Country

: US

 

Alias 1

: The~Anti;Nolan ©

Website 1

: click to view website

Website 2

: click to view website

This man is an absolutely evil example of human wastage. When people expose him for who he is he resorts to false accusations regarding peoples morals and labels innocent people with claims of paedophilia and violence.

He claims to be a writer but really is a good for nothing marijuana cultivator who corrupts young people for profit.
He is a serial stalker, especially online as he will create many fake profile to attack and defame.
At all costs stay clear of this man as he truly fits the "psycho" label this page carries.


This is his entry on CAF.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...


This is the CAF Entry that links Chris Merrett to ASIO. Psyopsid463 is an email address we know to be associated with ASIO.

superhacker1964@hotmail.com  This was a temporary account from someone in ASIO who is our friend. The man mentioned in this email, Mark Flowers, has been criminally abused by the government for more than 12 years now. I admin his web site www.markflowers.org. You can see on this link that they have his addresses over many years. Very few people would have been able to get his address list over so many years. Mark Flowers confirmed these were his addresses.

Gary Kelso was a man who Mark Flowers alleges was brutally murdered by the NSW Police to cover up the NSW Police torturing mark while in custody. I suggest you read this entry because it demonstrates that many tens of thousands of Australians are under surveillance by ASIO at any given time.

You can see that “Illuminati Ingrid” has sent Chris Merrett an email directly.

Now. One thing to take note. There was a deliberate error in the email from Illuminati Ingrid to Chris Merrett. It would seem that this deliberate error was an attempt to find out how our contact inside ASIO is.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

As you can see in that link there were numerous videos released by Chris Merrett that he has now taken down.

Perhaps he does grow dope and sell it to kids. I don’t know. But as can be seen from the “anti-bogan” site it is not only me he likes to slander. He likes to slander muslims as “terrorists” as well.

The evidence presented ties him to Illuminati Ingrid and ties him to ASIO via the email with Psyopsid463. To check the link for Psyopsid463 go to this link.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

You will see that my video was taken down by the id Psyopsid463@asio.gov.au. This was the id used to take down my court room video. The link was posted to one of the hate sites that has now been removed. But I took a screen shot of the page the link pointed to. The domain asio.gov.au existed at that time. To take down a video like this you have to provide a valid email address.

Be careful to also click on this link:
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/L...


In order to try and discredit such a hopeless case of incompetence on the behalf of ASIO to leave evidence that ASIO had taken down my video ASIO released a cover story saying that Chinese hackers had compromised ASIO email addresses and put that out on the news channels. It is all in the link.

And, of course, his case file for CAF is on this link. This contains the Affidavit I read into the record today.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

Now, the Antibogan site linked the numerous videos Chris Merrett made that he later deleted and tied the images of Chris Merrett that he has used on line to me with the videos that were released. Therefore the anti-bogan page corroborates my testimony that there were videos produced by Chris Merrett that showed his face and he was using his own name and that they match the photographs of the man who has been slandering me.

As I said. I would go find some people who saw the videos and can add evidence to back up my testimony that this was the case.

I hope this assists those who are undecided in their deliberations over the next week or two.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan

New Post
 4/28/2014 8:19 PM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/28/2014 2:20:12 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 28 April 2014 11:16
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: FW: Further Evidence on the slander of Chris Merritt of myself (and others)

Dear All,

Jury member 0026 put this question to me. I believe it is appropriate to resend it to all jury members as you deliberate on the question of damages.

One important question.

Why has he selected you?

What on earth is behind all this?



I can only speculate so you can not take this as me providing evidence. As the jury forman said there is a question as to whether speculation is advisable to be entering into testimony. It is a difficult question to address because speculation can lead people off track. However, speculation may also be true and it is reasonable to speculate as long as the jury member is clearly aware that such statements are not statements of first hand knowledge or experience and should not be treated as such.

I first came up with a plan to challenge the hegemony of the “Illuminati” or what ever you want to call the people who run the world in 2008.

I made myself known to them and made it clear I was going to attempt this in June 2008. I was tracked down and offered a job inside 2 weeks. I was shocked to be tracked down as I had just moved house and almost no one knew where I lived. But they knew where I was working so they followed me home it would seem.

The job offer was a very good one. The price would have been that I not go ahead with my plan. I turned the offer down.

This proved two things to me.

1. These people really did exist and really did take notice of what was happening in the world. I was not even sure myself at the time. It seemed all too fantastic, right?

2. My plan had some hope of working. If my plan had no hope of working they would have ignored me, right?


So as long ago as July 2008 the Powers that Be made it clear they knew who I was, knew what I was up to, and preferred that I join them rather than oppose them.

In 2009/10 I spent a lot of time in the UK.  MI5 or MI6 (I have no idea which one) decided they were going to harass me a bit. The harassment was laughable and every time they called me I invited them to come over to my local eatery for dinner and “lets sit down and have a chat”. The number they called me on was very closely held. It was a pre-paid mobile I bought in the UK without my name associated with it so they actually had to do some digging among people I worked with to get the number.

In September 2010 Michelle McDougal, an old school friend, told Michael Toal (my mentally unstable brother in law) that I was the person behind an onling persona called “globalman”. As globalman I was exposing the criminality of the courts and the governments. I did not know Michael Toal was ASIO at the time. You can read his CAF entry here.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

Michael Toal is severely mentally unstable. His father and the NSW Police have been advised that he should be taken into the mental health system and treated properly. He is not fit to stand trial. Since his father and the NSW Police refuse to take him in to the mental health system I have issued a notice to put him beyond the protection of the law. He has consistently slandered and threatened violence against people who are publicly linked to me for three years now.

Michael Toal has also been accused of sexually assaulting his little sister, Suzanne, as a teen. Bill Toal has been accused of sexually assaulting Suzanne as a teen girl as well. The evidence suggests that Jennifer Toal, my ex, threatened Bill Toal with exposure of the allegation by Suzanne that Bill sexually abused her to gain his support in her crimes in the family law courts. The notice to the Wagga Wagga police of the allegation of child sexual abuse by Bill Toal is on this link.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

Further, Catherine Byne, the feminist deputy commissioner of NSW Police has refused to investigate Suzanne Toals accusations that Bill and Michael sexually assaulted her when she was a teen girl. There are very few people who can tell the deputy commissioner of NSW police not to investigate credible accusations of sexual abuse of minor girls. ASIO are one of  those groups who can do that.

Here is the link to Catherine Burns entry in CAF.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

It only came out later that Michael Toal worked for ASIO. His specialty is that he is a marksman. We have some evidence that he was sent to Afghanistan to train Australian and US troops in marksmanship of some sort. When we get to ASIO files and witnesses we will find out what he was really up to. His “cover” was that he was a freelance photographer and he freelanced for the Army Magazine.

Funny how one of the other men who worked on the “Army Magazine” was rewarded with the job of NSW Sheriff.

When we exposed Michael Toal as working for ASIO under the cover of a freelance photographer the site pertaining to the magazine was immediately taken down. This is as big an admission of guilt as you are going to get from ASIO.

Chris Merrett started his attack in about October or November 2010. This was just after I was outed as “globalman” by Michael Toal.

The speculation is that Michael Toal was able to convince his colleagues at ASIO to attack me publicly. I have my own little army of anonymous online trolls who follow me everywhere I go and call me a paedophile etc. Since we have this email.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

This email ties Chris Merrett directly to “Illuminati Ingrid” who has waged a thee year online slander campaign against me it would seem reasonable to believe that Chris Merrett is in some way associated with ASIO. It would therefore seem reasonable to believe that Michael Toal is known to Chris Merrett and is in some way responsible for Chris Merretts desire to spend many hundreds of hours attacking me online and emailing me. 622 emails over three years is a lot of time! The many hundreds, if not thousands of posts he has made also take a lot of time.

Again, just as speculation, it is reasonable to presume Chris Merrett has been paid by ASIO to slander me. This will be able to be investigated when we gain access to ASIO files and witnesses. If Chris Merrett has been paid by ASIO then it is safe to presume that Michael Toal is the man who facilitated the hiring of Chris Merrett to slander me.

So. Why me?

Because I am one of the most dangerous men in the world to the current “ruling elite”.

The idea of a separate economy and the idea of holding criminals in governments accountable for their crimes are the two most dangerous ideas there can be to the “ruling elite”.

Further, that I have taken sanctuary in Germany, a land where it is commonly acknowledged standing up to criminals in government is a good thing and to be supported, it is not possible for ASIO to do much about what I am doing. The german government seems to have made it very clear to the Irish and Australian governments that they will not sanction action against me because it would be too embarrassing to the German government.

The very fact that ASIO has expended such large amounts of time, money and effort against me would indicate that they are very concerned as to the level of damage the idea of new courts and a second economy will cause them.

Chris Merrett is only one of many online trolls who expend great amounts of time slandering me. Further, when these trolls first arrived they displayed remarkable knowledge of the legal system. Far more than anything Michael Toal would be familiar with. I did not realize for some time that these trolls were ASIO. That only came out later. But the level of knowledge of the trolling indicated men who were very well versed in the legal systems around the world.

Their trolling efforts were aimed at discrediting the Strawman Recapture Process and convincing people that it did not work. They have been quite successful in doing so around the world. Most people do not know about this process and do not know that it does work.

Once they had done that they generally limit their trolling to basic name calling which is remarkably effective because most people would very much prefer to believe the worst of someone based on no evidence at all than the best of someone based on a mountain of evidence that is public.

I hope this answers your question.

Their intent in trolling me is to stop people listening to what I have to say because it is true.  

If what I was saying was not true ASIO, Chris Merrett, and others, would not bother telling lies about me personally. They would attack what I am saying. Since they can not attack what I am saying they attack me. It is quite standard.

Since I am in germany the german government will not allow them to gang stalk me which is what they do to people in Australia. 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
  

New Post
 4/28/2014 8:32 PM
 
 Modified By host  on 4/28/2014 2:43:24 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 28 April 2014 11:16
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: Update on Audio Recordings

Dear All,

Please be advised that a jury member has asked that the audio recordings not be released to the public.

His concern is that ASIO will retrieve the recordings and attempt to find out who he is.

I agree this is a legitimate concern. We know ASIO are trying to damage our ability to run such courts which is why we took the precaution of using only first names and jury member numbers.

That said, I will release to the public only the portions of audio that have Marco as secretary and myself reading into the record the evidence again.

I will transcript what was said as and when I have the time to do so. It might take a week or two to transcript the open discussion in the trial.

I will put such updates as this on the case registry entry. The case registry entry will contain the public record of the jury trials.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
New Post
 5/14/2014 1:11 PM
 
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumVictoriaVictoriaVictoria Parent ForumVictoria Parent ForumCasesCasesMBA-LS-AA002 Peter Nolan vs Chris MerrettMBA-LS-AA002 Peter Nolan vs Chris Merrett