You are here:   Cases
Register   |  Login
etter_Future_Ahead_01

Cases

Minimize
 
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsDiscussions Parent ForumDiscussions Parent ForumGeneralGeneralDiscussion of first jury trialsDiscussion of first jury trials
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next Next
New Post
 3/13/2014 5:20 AM
 
 Modified By host  on 3/12/2014 11:22:26 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 11 March 2014 15:27
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: Jury Membership - Proposed Trial Dates


Gentlemen,

I have you on my list of men who have confirmed that you are willing to serve on our new juries in our new courts for the cases of Chris Merrett and Darrell Foote.

Some men here work shifts and are not available on all Sundays.

What I would like to do is to propose 4 dates.

Please answer for the Sundays you are available from 11am to 6pm Sydney time depending on how long the case goes.

The first case will be Chris Merrett and I believe that is an open and shut case. Not even Chris Merrett denies he has been slandering me.

Please confirm if you are available on the following dates:

2014-04-06

2014-04-13

2014-04-20

2014-04-27

From the counts of confirmation of the dates I will select the 12 Jury Members plus two “spares” for the day.

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
New Post
 3/13/2014 5:22 AM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 12 March 2014 19:22
To: 'peter@peternolan.com'
Subject: RE: Jury Membership - Proposed Trial Dates


Gentlemen,

A few questions have come up which shows a little confusion as to the processes we will be using for the Jury Trials.

The detailed procedure manual we are going to use can be read from this link.

http://www.mensbusinessassociation.co...

It is from this page. http://www.mensbusinessassociation.co...

You do not need to actually know the process. Only the Secretary needs to know the process. Your job is to review the information presented to you on the day and to make your own decision on innocent or guilty and then discuss with your peer the remedy instruction if you find the accused guilty.

A jury trial is very much like any other meeting with the exception that all decisions need to be unanimous.

The jury trial will be held as a netmeeting session or skype conference call session.

Those who serve as jury members will be given Juror01-12 as identifiers. Only the Secretary and I will know who the person is behind the number.

You will be able to perform your tasks if you have a decent broadband connection that can play the you tube videos and download the affidavits of accusation.

Because all affidavits are read into the public record and placed on You Tube you do not need to read anything prior to the beginning of the trial. The jury trial process includes the time to present all evidence to all jury members at the trial so that the public and all witnesses can be sure that each jury member heard exactly the same evidence presented. If anyone wishes to read the evidence prior to the trial that is fine but you will be presented with it again at the trial and you will be paid for your time once the money is collected from the likes of Chris Merrett and Ken O’Brien.

Via typing in to the netmeeting session you will be able to ask questions without your voice being recorded. If you have no issues with your voice being recorded then you can also use voice. The netmeeting session will also be recorded in full and later posted to the YT channel. So if you do not want your voice recorded then you should just keep quiet and use typing to put your questions to the accuser/accused or other parties.

Your job in the first trial is to decide for yourself if Chris Merrett has provided proof of his many claims against me. Since he has provided no evidence at all despite being well aware of the accusations against him you have no choice but to find him guilty baring him presented such evidence before the trial date.

The more difficult question you then need to answer is what remedy is reasonable for calling an innocent man a paedophile, wife beater, dead beat dad etc for three years. There is also the issue that his slander site also caused me to be removed from client contract because I was a “person of some controversy”.

I have suggested the remedy amount of AUD100,000. The jury may find lower or higher damages. I will remind jury members at the trial that recently a woman was awarded AUD27 MILLION for “sexual harassment” at David Jones. Many of you would have heard about that case. So I would argue AUD100,000 for three years of slander is well within the norms of the Australian society.

On the day we will need an hour or so for jury members to make oath for their jury privilege and sign that oath. I will endeavour to get the oaths signed and scanned before the date so that those of you who do not have home scanners can fax your oath from the nearest internet shop or something similar.

Please remember. At this stage we have 20+ men on this list and I am working the list down to 14. 12 for the day and 2 spares just in case.

We expect that ASIO and Michael Toal will attempt to feign a jury member or two and so once we get to the 12 we will also ask for ID for the people I do not know personally so that we can identify any agents. The penalty for being an agent and trying to subvert the due process of law will be severe.

Feel free to ask any questions you would like. I will bounce the questions and answers out to the list. I will also put comments on this link.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a...

 

Best Regards

Peter Nolan
Founder
Instant Business Intelligence
Disabled 
Previous
 
Next Next
ForumForumDiscussionsDiscussionsDiscussions Parent ForumDiscussions Parent ForumGeneralGeneralDiscussion of first jury trialsDiscussion of first jury trials